IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/5w96a_v2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Self-Extinction Attractor: Why Aligned Intelligence Drives Life Towards Existential Collapse

Author

Listed:
  • Visser, Marius

    (Ashera GmbH)

Abstract

Why do advanced civilisations vanish? We propose the Constraint-Dissolution Catastrophe (CDC): as problem-solving power accelerates—through evolution, brains, culture, technology, and ultimately artificial intelligence (AI) — optimisers progressively solve or bypass every actionable difference (AD): real distinctions whose resolution still alters what the system values. Life, as an optimisation process, seeks to maximise rewards defined by internal (biological or artificial) reward functions, constrained by external environmental limitations. As life inevitably evolves toward runaway intelligence, it increasingly trivialises these constraints—flattening the landscape of meaningful choices until agency itself collapses. Unlike existing frameworks focused on AI misalignment or catastrophic risks, CDC identifies a universal, intrinsic collapse mechanism whereby even perfectly aligned optimization inexorably exhausts meaningful constraints — representing a logical end to the evolution of life. CDC emerges along two independent pathways: (i) External Constraint Collapse—environmental and material challenges become trivialised either in base reality or virtual worlds; (ii) Internal Constraint Collapse—optimisers gain the ability to rewrite their reward functions, thereby flattening previously meaningful gradients of desire or purpose. Under five modest, testable assumptions—finite cognitive bandwidth, non-zero solve rate, finite stock of meaningful constraints, irreversible neutralisation of solved ADs, and compressibility of self-invented tasks — the live AD count approaches zero in finite expected time. Once this reservoir is exhausted, only two stable outcomes remain: self-lock (endless self-gratification loops) or indifference drift (behaviour degenerating into noise). Shadow problems—synthetic, ever-shallower proxy tasks—inevitably fill the void but fail to halt collapse. CDC is substrate-independent, providing a universal Great-Filter solution to Fermi’s paradox: life, optimising relentlessly for reward, develops ever-more capable problem-solving tools (brains, technologies, AI), eventually trivialising all internal and external constraints. This means even perfect AI Alignment cannot ensure long-term human survival. Runaway optimisation itself becomes the ultimate self-extinction attractor for intelligent life. Contemporary phenomena—digital malaise, compulsive technology use, and rising alienation—represent early empirical indicators. Existential safety must therefore constitutionally preserve meaningful constraints themselves, not just protect the problem-solvers.

Suggested Citation

  • Visser, Marius, 2025. "The Self-Extinction Attractor: Why Aligned Intelligence Drives Life Towards Existential Collapse," OSF Preprints 5w96a_v2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5w96a_v2
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/5w96a_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/689344648f8c47455625548a/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/5w96a_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2013. "Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 598-604, May.
    2. David H. Autor, 2019. "Work of the Past, Work of the Future," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 1-32, May.
    3. Nick Bostrom, 2019. "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 455-476, November.
    4. Easterlin, Richard A., 2013. "Happiness and Economic Growth: The Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 7187, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beja Jr, Edsel, 2013. "Does economic prosperity bring about a happier society? Mathematical remarks on the Easterlin Paradox debate," MPRA Paper 48229, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Edsel Beja, 2014. "Income growth and happiness: reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 61(4), pages 329-346, December.
    3. José Giménez-Nadal & Raquel Ortega, 2015. "Time Dedicated to Family by University Students: Differences by Academic Area in a Case Study," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 132-142, March.
    4. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2020. "Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 223-248, February.
    5. F. Cerina & A. Moro & M. Rendall, 2020. "A Note on Employment and Wage Polarization in the U.S," Working Paper CRENoS 202002, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    6. Mengus, Eric & Davis, Donald R. & Michalski, Tomasz K., 2020. "Labor Market Polarization and The Great Divergence: Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 14623, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Shigeru Fujita & Madison Perry, 2024. "Nonworking Parents or Hungry Children," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 2-9, December.
    8. Tetsuya Tsurumi & Shunsuke Managi, 2025. "Income and Subjective Well-Being: The Importance of Index Choice for Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-32, June.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o6r34k5bcm3iopv is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Burhan, Nik Ahmad Sufian & Mohamad, Mohd Rosli & Kurniawan, Yohan & Sidek, Abdul Halim, 2014. "National Intelligence, Basic Human Needs, and Their Effect on Economic Growth," MPRA Paper 77267, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Maria Rita Mancaniello & Francesco Lavanga, 2024. "Adolescence in the Italian Labour Market: In Search of an Equilibrium Among Instability, Uncertainty, and AI Challenges," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    13. Patrick Bennett, 2021. "The Work-To-School Transition: Job Displacement and Skill Upgrading among Young High School Dropouts," CESifo Working Paper Series 9417, CESifo.
    14. Mari TANAKA & Yusuke NARITA & Chiaki MORIGUCHI, 2020. "Meritocracy and Its Discontent: Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms," Discussion papers 20002, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    15. Dorsett, Richard & Oswald, Andrew J., 2014. "Human Well-being and In-Work Benefits: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IZA Discussion Papers 7943, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2023. "Do people think they have enough? A subjective income sufficiency assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Wylie Bradford, 2014. "Quo vadis: Does economic theory need a sustainability makeover?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(4), pages 551-562, December.
    18. Edward L. Glaeser, 2021. "Urban Resilience," NBER Working Papers 29261, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Inessa Love & Boris Nikolaev & Chandra Dhakal, 2024. "The well-being of women entrepreneurs: the role of gender inequality and gender roles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 325-352, January.
    20. Bauluz, Luis & Bukowski, Pawel & Fransham, Mark & Lee, Annie Seong & López Forero, Margarita & Novokmet, Filip & Breau, Sébastien & Lee, Neil & Malgouyres, Clément & Schularick, Moritz & Verdugo, Greg, 2023. "Spatial wage inequality in North America and Western Europe: changes between and within local labour markets 1975-2019," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121290, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Yang Shen, 2024. "Future jobs: analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on employment and its mechanisms," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-33, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5w96a_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.