IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/nyj2p_v1.html

How and why do we study research methods? The TYPE-ME typology of methods research

Author

Listed:
  • Schandelmaier, Stefan
  • Chiaborelli, Malena
  • Hirt, Julian
  • Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
  • Briel, Matthias
  • Puljak, Livia
  • Munn, Zachary
  • Khalil, Hanan
  • Pieper, Dawid

    (Brandenburg Medical School)

  • Heinze, Georg

Abstract

Background: Methods research aims to develop, evaluate, refine, or provide guidance on research methods, support their implementation or de-implementation, or synthesize existing methods research. Many types of methods research appear in health research journals, but their labels, definitions, and boundaries remain unclear. This complicates planning, reporting, indexing, and teaching, and limits the visibility of the field. We aimed to develop, refine and pilot-test a typology for recognising, describing, and classifying methods research. Methods: An international panel of 11 methodologists developed the typology through written feedback, structured group discussions, and iterative revision. In two testing rounds, panel members independently applied the typology to 52 methods research articles from 26 journals, generating 494 article assessments. We used the results to refine definitions and labels, add boundary notes, and document remaining disagreements. Results: TYPE-ME defines methods research and organizes it along two cross-cutting dimensions: approach (“how?”, 15 types) and objective (“why?”, 14 types). Testing clarified difficult boundaries and led to a condensed version that distinguishes 10 types for quick orientation: theory-based methods research; simulation studies; methods research based on real data; methodological randomized studies; surveys, interviews, or focus groups; consensus studies; studies of applied methods; syntheses of methods research; guidance for applying, reporting, or assessing methods; and methodological implementation research. Detailed type descriptions, boundary notes, and examples appear in an accompanying document and at www.methods-research.org. Conclusions: TYPE-ME offers a common reference for recognising, describing, and classifying methods research, and can support its planning, reporting, indexing, and teaching. As a living typology, it will evolve through application, user feedback, and further testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Schandelmaier, Stefan & Chiaborelli, Malena & Hirt, Julian & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Briel, Matthias & Puljak, Livia & Munn, Zachary & Khalil, Hanan & Pieper, Dawid & Heinze, Georg, 2026. "How and why do we study research methods? The TYPE-ME typology of methods research," MetaArXiv nyj2p_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:nyj2p_v1
    DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/nyj2p_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a6b5fe21b41f6bfbc0131ad/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31222/osf.io/nyj2p_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    2. Sally Hopewell & An-Wen Chan & Gary S Collins & Asbjørn Hróbjartsson & David Moher & Kenneth F Schulz & Ruth Tunn & Rakesh Aggarwal & Michael Berkwits & Jesse A Berlin & Nita Bhandari & Nancy J Butche, 2025. "CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Mohamad Alshurafa & Matthias Briel & Elie A Akl & Ted Haines & Paul Moayyedi & Stephen J Gentles & Lorena Rios & Chau Tran & Neera Bhatnagar & Francois Lamontagne & Stephen D Walter & Gordon H Guyatt, 2012. "Inconsistent Definitions for Intention-To-Treat in Relation to Missing Outcome Data: Systematic Review of the Methods Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gülüm Özer & İdil Işık & Jordi Escartín, 2024. "Is There Somebody Looking out for Me? A Qualitative Analysis of Bullying Experiences of Individuals Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:4001-4024 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ruth Bhekekile Shandu & Thokozani Ian Nzimakwe & Reward Utete, 2024. "Analysing the effects of flexible working conditions in the workplace: An exploratory study," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(6), pages 109-120, December.
    4. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    5. Mlamli Diko, 2023. "Advancing agriculture through Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) in South African indigenous or black communities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(2), pages 267-277, March.
    6. Sofia Dias & Alex J. Sutton & Nicky J. Welton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 618-640, July.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0166774 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Conny Wollbrant & David Andersson & Magnus Johannesson & Gustav Tinghög & Daniel Västfjäll & Kristian Ove R. Myrseth, 2020. "The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 26-42, June.
    9. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    10. Chikako Ishizuka & Kei Aoki, 2024. "Drivers of sustained brand engagement: cases of long-term customers of hedonic and utilitarian brands in Japan," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 979-989, December.
    11. repec:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:5:p:12566-12579 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Soo-Young Yu & Eunyoung E. Suh & Seongmi Lim & Ji-yeon Kim, 2024. "An Exploratory Study of Ideal Medical Systems Based on the Experiences of Laypeople in South Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.
    13. Duarte Alonso, Abel & Vu, Oanh Thi Kim & Nguyen, Trung Q. & McClelland, Robert & Nguyen, Ngan M. & Huynh, Hoa Thi Ngoc & Akbari, Mohammadreza & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2025. "Beyond technology: A socio-technical lens on Industry 4.0 value-adding across industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Joseph M. Buguis & Reynaldo Castro, 2025. "Construct Development and Validation of Service Quality in the Context of Private Hospitals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 6053-6077, July.
    15. Bruelisauer, Samuel & Villar, Gesabel & Oberlack, Christoph, 2026. "Sustainability governance diversifies: unpacking private-sector governance strategies in coffee and cocoa value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Daniel Muir & Cristiana Orlando & Becci Newton, 2024. "Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or ‘at risk’ young people: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    17. Dudka, Aurore, 2025. "A relational approach to prosuming through energy communities: The case of CIREN in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Nelson, Jon Paul, 2020. "Fixed-effect versus random-effects meta-analysis in economics: A study of pass-through rates for alcohol beverage excise taxes," Economics Discussion Papers 2020-1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    19. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:507-520 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. George Valiotis & Sandra C. Buttigieg & Americo Cicchetti & Rui Dang & Nabil Jamshed & Marija Jevtic & Teresa Magalhães & Henk Nies & Mangfred Pferzinger & Rui Santana & Tiago Correia & Emmi Weller & , 2025. "Defining Health Management: A Conceptual Foundation for Excellence Through Efficiency, Sustainability and Equity," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 788-793, May.
    21. Ibrahim Y. Tawbe, 2023. "Environmental disclosure programs and birth weight: a meta- analysis," Working Papers 2023-02, CRESE.
    22. Reem Mohamed Gouda & Yasser Tawfik Halim, 2025. "The role of sustainable social media content in enhancing customer loyalty in the hospitality industry," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    23. Gawon Yun & Douglas N. Hales, 2026. "Drivers of location advantages in the medical device industry: a qualitative study," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, March.
    24. Immas Nurhayati & Syarifah Gustiawati & Rofiáh Rofiáh & Sri Pujiastuti & Isbandriyati Mutmainah & Bambang Hengky Rainanto & Sri Harini & Endri Endri, 2025. "Community-Based Halal Tourism and Information Digitalization: Sustainable Tourism Analysis," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:nyj2p_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.