IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1004587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Hopewell
  • An-Wen Chan
  • Gary S Collins
  • Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
  • David Moher
  • Kenneth F Schulz
  • Ruth Tunn
  • Rakesh Aggarwal
  • Michael Berkwits
  • Jesse A Berlin
  • Nita Bhandari
  • Nancy J Butcher
  • Marion K Campbell
  • Runcie C W Chidebe
  • Diana Elbourne
  • Andrew Farmer
  • Dean A Fergusson
  • Robert M Golub
  • Steven N Goodman
  • Tammy C Hoffmann
  • John P A Ioannidis
  • Brennan C Kahan
  • Rachel L Knowles
  • Sarah E Lamb
  • Steff Lewis
  • Elizabeth Loder
  • Martin Offringa
  • Philippe Ravaud
  • Dawn P Richards
  • Frank W Rockhold
  • David L Schriger
  • Nandi L Siegried
  • Sophie Staniszewska
  • Rod S Taylor
  • Lehana Thabane
  • David Torgerson
  • Sunita Vohra
  • Ian R White
  • Isabelle Boutron

Abstract

Background: Well designed and properly executed randomised trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of healthcare interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Here, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT, to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment), other related reporting guidelines (TIDieR) and recommendations from other sources (e.g., personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, three-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a two-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. Results: We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added seven new checklist items, revised three items, deleted one item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomised trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. Conclusions: Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomised trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent. Author summary: To interpret a randomised trial accurately, readers need complete and transparent information on its methods and findings.The CONSORT 2025 statement provides updated guidance for reporting the results of randomised trials, that reflects methodological advancements and feedback from end users.The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items, a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial, and an expanded checklist that details the critical elements of each checklist item.Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomised trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Hopewell & An-Wen Chan & Gary S Collins & Asbjørn Hróbjartsson & David Moher & Kenneth F Schulz & Ruth Tunn & Rakesh Aggarwal & Michael Berkwits & Jesse A Berlin & Nita Bhandari & Nancy J Butche, 2025. "CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004587
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004587
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004587&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alison Farrell & On Behalf of the PLOS Medicine Editors, 2025. "Improving transparency in clinical trial reporting," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(4), pages 1-3, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1004587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.