Determinants of Student Retention of Microeconomic Concepts
In this study, we examine a variety of individual, institutional, and course-specific factors that influence students' retention of concepts from the microeconomics principles course. Students in 15 upper-division courses in the SUNY-Oswego economics department completed a survey instrument and the TUCE exam at the beginning of the Spring 1999 semester. A regression analysis is used to examine the effect of principles course characteristics on student recall (as measured by TUCE score), controlling for student demographic and ability characteristics. Among the factors examined are the impacts of large-class instruction, writing-intensive curricular, and the time interval since the completion of the principles course. The results suggest that students who have completed a writing-intensive introductory microeconomics course perform significantly less well on the TUCE exam at the start of their upper-division courses than do students who participated in classes that relied on multiple-choice examinations.
|Date of creation:||02 Mar 1999|
|Date of revision:||18 Mar 1999|
|Note:||This paper was presented on March 12, 1999 in Boston at the Eastern Economic Association conference.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Department of Economics, SUNY-Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126, U.S.|
Web page: http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Heath, Julia A, 1989. "An Econometric Model of the Role of Gender in Economic Education," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(2), pages 226-230, May.
- Ronald W. Crowley & David A. Wilton, 1974. "An Analysis of 'Learning' in Introductory Economics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 7(4), pages 665-673, November.
- Ferber, Marianne A, 1995. "The Study of Economics: A Feminist Critique," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 357-361, May.
- Mary O. Borg & Stephen L. Shapiro, 1996. "Personality Type and Student Performance in Principles of Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 3-25, January.
- Roberta Edgecombe Robb & A. Leslie Robb, 1999.
"Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of Gender of the Instructor,"
The Journal of Economic Education,
Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 3-19, January.
- Robb, R.E. & Robb, A.L., 1996. "Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of Gender of the Instructor," Working Papers 1996-05, Brock University, Department of Economics.
- Robb, R.E. & Robb, A.L., 1996. "Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of Gender of the Instructor," Papers 1996-05, York (Canada) - Department of Economics.
- Karen E. Dynan & Cecilia Elena Rouse, 1997. "The Underrepresentation of Women in Economics: A Study of Undergraduate Economics Students," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 350-368, December.
- Ellen Miller & Geraldine Westmoreland, 1998. "Student Response to Selective Grading in College Economics Courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 195-201, September.
- Siegfried, John J & Kennedy, Peter E, 1995. "Does Pedagogy Vary with Class Size in Introductory Economics?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 347-351, May.
- Maureen J. Lage & Michael Treglia, 1996. "The Impact of Integrating Scholarship on Women into Introductory Economics: Evidence from One Institution," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 26-36, January.
- Rajshree Agarwal & A. Edward Day, 1998. "The Impact of the Internet on Economic Education," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 99-110, June.
- Akerhielm, Karen, 1995. "Does class size matter?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 229-241, September. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nyo:oswaaa:199901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John Kane)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.