IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Deferred fees for universities

Listed author(s):
  • Neil Shephard


    (Nuffield College and Oxford-Mann Institute, Oxford University, Oxford.)

I will argue for a simpler, fairer, more fiscally responsible and flexible form of university funding and student support. This system is designed to encourage a diverse higher education sector where high quality provision can flourish. The main points of the new system are: 1. Make student financial support available to cover all tuition and a modest cost of living. 2. Allow graduates to repay according to earnings with protection for poorer graduates. 3. Call HEFCE teaching grants “scholarships” and make students aware of their value. 4. Cap the level of funded fees plus HEFCE grant at the current level. 5. Allow universities to charge deferred fees. a. When they are paid the money goes to the student’s university not to the state. These fees have no fiscal implications. b. Bring some of the cash flow from deferred fees forward by working with a bank. 6. In the long-run move to making the cost of living support simpler by a. Providing more realistic cost of living support for all students. b. Removing means-tested university bursaries for cost of living expenses. c. Removing means-tested grants to students provided by the state. This builds on England’s higher education structure. The changes are simple to implement. It would set up a stable funding structure for our universities & provide the financial support our students need.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford in its series Economics Papers with number 2010-W03.

in new window

Length: 33 pages
Date of creation: 01 Mar 2010
Handle: RePEc:nuf:econwp:1003
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:

  1. Economic Logic blog

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nuf:econwp:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maxine Collett)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.