Can Medical Progress be Sustained? Implications of the Link Between Development and Output Markets
There is considerable debate about the impact of health care reform on the growth in medical spending. Medical innovation is thought to be a central contributor to that growth. We argue that there is a unique linkage between reforms that affect output markets for medical care and medical R&D costs. This linkage is due to the fact that potential consumers of medical care are also potential participants in clinical trials that are required to develop new medical products. Therefore, reforms that increase the quality or reduce the price of already developed treatments reduce the incentive of patients to participate in trials of experimental treatments. This delays development and reduce the returns to in innovation. We provide evidence of this "subject market effect" by considering the impact of changes in the quality of conventional care on development. We document a dramatic drop in trial recruitment following introduction of break-through HIV/AIDS therapies in 1996. We conclude by discussing additional positive and normative implications of the subject market effect that link input and output markets for medical products.
|Date of creation:||May 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Philipson, Tomas, 1997. "The evaluation of new health care technology: The labor economics of statistics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 375-395.
- Darius Lakdawalla & Neeraj Sood, 2006.
"Health Insurance as a Two-Part Pricing Contract,"
NBER Working Papers
12681, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sylvain Chassang & Gerard Padro i Miquel & Erik Snowberg, 2010.
"Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments,"
1262, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Econometric Research Program..
- Sylvain Chassang & Gerard Padro I Miquel & Erik Snowberg, 2012. "Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1279-1309, June.
- Chassang, Sylvain & Padró i Miquel, Gerard & Snowberg, Erik, 2010. "Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments," CEPR Discussion Papers 8003, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Sylvain Chassang & Gerard Padro i Miquel & Erik Snowberg, 2010. "Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments," NBER Working Papers 16343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Dana Goldman & Darius Lakdawalla & Neeraj Sood, 2004.
"HIV Breakthroughs and Risk Sexual Behavior,"
NBER Working Papers
10516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Amitabh Chandra & Douglas O. Staiger, 2007. "Productivity Spillovers in Health Care: Evidence from the Treatment of Heart Attacks," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115, pages 103-140.
- Malani, Anup, 2008. "Patient enrollment in medical trials: Selection bias in a randomized experiment," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 341-351, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.