Government Distortion in Independently Owned Media: Evidence from U.S. Cold War News Coverage of Human Rights
This paper investigates the extent to which strategic objectives of the U.S. government influenced news coverage during the Cold War. We establish two relationships: 1) strategic objectives of the U.S. government cause the State Department to under-report human rights violations of strategic allies; and 2) these objectives reduce news coverage of human rights abuses for strategic allies in six U.S. national newspapers. To establish causality, we exploit plausibly exogenous variation in a country's strategic value to the U.S. from the interaction of its political alliance to the U.S. and membership on the United Nations Security Council. In addition to the main results, we are able to provide qualitative evidence and indirect quantitative evidence to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the reduced form effects.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2010|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Nancy Qian & David Yanagizawa, 2009.
"The Strategic Determinants of U.S. Human Rights Reporting: Evidence from The Cold War,"
Journal of the European Economic Association,
MIT Press, vol. 7(2-3), pages 446-457, 04-05.
- Qian, Nancy & Yanagizawa-Drott, David, 2008. "The Strategic Determinants of U.S. Human Rights Reporting: Evidence from the Cold War," CEPR Discussion Papers 7026, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.