IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Testing for Moderating Effects in Limited Dependent Variable Models : Structural versus Secondary Interactions

Listed author(s):
  • Harry P. Bowen


    (McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte)

The use of discrete limited dependent variable (LDV) models such as logit and probit is becoming ubiquitous in empirical management research. When using such models, researchers frequently postulate and test that the relationship between an explanatory variable and the dependent variable is moderated by another variable by including in the model an interaction variable. While recent papers clarify the methods for deriving and analyzing a moderating effect in LDV models, it is not widely understood or appreciated that this moderating effect confounds two moderating effects: one that arises from including an interaction variable in the model and one that arises naturally from the inherent nonlinearity of such models. This paper addresses this issue and presents a method to separate these two sources of a moderating effect for a general class of nonlinear models that includes all the LDV models commonly used in the management literature. Given this, the paper demonstrates that the statistically correct method to assess the validity of a moderating hypothesis in such models is not, as currently recommended, to test for significance of the moderating effect derived from the model that includes the interaction variable but is instead to test for significance of the difference between two moderating effects: that arising from the model that includes the interaction variable and arising from the model that excludes the interaction variable; this difference is the secondary moderating effect. The result that the secondary moderating effect is properly the focus of analysis for testing a moderating hypothesis is very general, in that it applies whenever a moderating hypothesis is to be tested by including an interaction variable in any model, whether linear or nonlinear.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte in its series Discussion Paper Series with number 2009-01.

in new window

Length: 40 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2009
Date of revision: Oct 2009
Publication status: Published 2012 in Journal of Management (Vol. 38 (May): 860-889) with title Testing for Moderating Effects in Limited Dependent Variable and Other Nonlinear Models: Secondary versus Total Interactions
Handle: RePEc:msb:wpaper:2009-01
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Ai, Chunrong & Norton, Edward C., 2003. "Interaction terms in logit and probit models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 123-129, July.
  2. Wiersema, M. & Bowen, H.P., 2006. "The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: assessment and critique," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-33, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:msb:wpaper:2009-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (HP Bowen)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.