IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

La dynamique de pauvreté au Burkina Faso revisitée : pauvreté durable et transitoire, et vulnérabilité

The study explores the dynamics of the welfare of the households in Burkina Faso during1990's, based on an ex ante dissociation of the forms of poverty related to the vulnerability – the ex ante risk that a household is poor ex post, if it is not poor, or that he remains poor, if it is already poor. Econometric analysis, based on cross-section data, and admitting that thevariance of the residuals of the determinants of the expenditure per capita of the households isexplained by the observable characteristics of the latter, allows to identify six segments of the distribution of the households in terms of the vulnerability to poverty: (i) durable poor; (ii) transient and involutive poor; (iii) transient and evolutive poor; (iv) vulnerable and precarious non-poor; (v) vulnerable non-poor, and; (vi) non-poor. This stratification shows that: (i) the vulnerability of the households is a situation much more widespread than poverty –46,6 and 34,5 percent, respectively; (ii) durable poverty is the most significant component of poverty – 57,6 percent; (iii) categories of non-poor households seems particularly exposed to the risk of poverty – 20,6 percent. The study balances the stability of the total poverty, notedbetween 1994-95 and 1998, while observing: (i) a progression of the proportion of very vulnerable households; (ii) a rise of durable poverty; (iii) an increase of the proportion of certain non-poor households strongly exposed to the risk of short-term poverty. From this situation results a growing number of vulnerable households because of a weakness of the expenditure per capita, and a decline of the relative importance of the families of which the vulnerability is inherent in a variability of the expenditure per capita – conclusions refined by the consideration of the areas and the labour market statutes. In addition, the study highlights several other lessons. Firstly, the growth of the average probability of national poverty of the households – 7,1 percent –, associated with almost unchanged indices of poverty, is heterogeneous: strong growth in the cities and weak increase in the rural sector. Secondly, among the sources of the vulnerability – compared to a reference household –, the effect of the expected expenditure dominates the effect of the variance at the national level – at a given time or during the period –, but is balanced in urban areas, compared to the rural zones. Lastly, using spatial data, research shows that: (i) the log of the ratio between the vulnerability and poverty grows with the provincial urbanization ; (ii) rates of durable and transient poverty are conversely correlated with the urbanization. These conclusions encourage to explore the effects of the structural and demographic changes on poverty and the vulnerability, with a logistic multinomial model. In particular, the analysis of sensitivity highlights the impact of a whole of factors inherent in the head of household or the group: instruction, age, sex, ethnicity, demography of the household, labour market statutes, rate of employment by household, transfers, migration, spatial localization. Finally, the effectiveness of the policies of fight against poverty is questioned in the absence of an integration at once of the temporal dimension of the welfare of the households, and taking into account of non-poor groups, but strongly exposed to the risk of short-term poverty. (Full text in French)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV in its series Documents de travail with number 77.

in new window

Length: 21 pages
Date of creation: Oct 2002
Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:77
Contact details of provider:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Ravallion, Martin, 2002. "On the urbanization of poverty," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 435-442, August.
  2. Jalan, Jyotsna & Ravallion, Martin, 1999. "Are the poor less well insured? Evidence on vulnerability to income risk in rural China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 61-81, February.
  3. Bob Baulch & John Hoddinott, 2000. "Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 1-24.
  4. Anselin, Luc & Bera, Anil K. & Florax, Raymond & Yoon, Mann J., 1996. "Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 77-104, February.
  5. Kakwani, N., 1990. "Testing For Significance Of Poverty Differences ; With Application To Cote D'Ivoire," Papers 90-3, New South Wales - School of Economics.
  6. Pritchett, Lant & Suryahadi, Asep & Sumarto, Sudarno, 2000. "Quantifying vulnerability to poverty - a proposed measure, applied to Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2437, The World Bank.
  7. Jalan, Jyotsna & Ravallion, Martin, 1998. "Transient Poverty in Postreform Rural China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 338-357, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.