Budget deficits, public debt and the level of public investment
This paper begins by briefly identifying the two traditions in macroeconomic analysis with regard to budget deficits, that of ‘fiscal consolidation and Ricardian equivalence’ and the ‘functional finance’ approach. The paper argues for the deficits/debt position to be approached in terms of ‘functional finance’, which sets the budget position to be compatible with the highest achievable and sustainable level of economic activity, to an alternative ‘rule’ for budget deficits to those such as ‘balanced budget over the cycle’. The paper points to the focus on the size of the public debt, and argues that the government’s capital account balance sheet should be viewed in terms of assets and liabilities and not liabilities alone. The paper also argues that there is no merit in the adoption of a ‘golden rule’.
|Date of creation:||03 Nov 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +39 02 50321522
Fax: +39 02 50321505
Web page: http://www.demm.unimi.it
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2009-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.