IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp17468.html

Trusted from Home: Managerial Beliefs and Workers' Spatial Autonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Gill, Adam

    (Uppsala University)

  • Nordström Skans, Oskar

    (Uppsala University)

Abstract

A key difference between on-site and remote work is the reduction in direct managerial oversight when tasks are performed outside traditional office settings. We use survey data on manager trust—measured by the question "...do you think that most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance?"—and relate the answers to employees' work-from-home intensities. Our results show that the remote work intensity is higher in countries, regions, and regions-by-industries where managers have higher levels of trust. This association remains robust after controlling for other dimensions of societal trust and confounding factors such as occupation types, broadband access, and digital skills. Manager trust was strongly related to work-from-home levels before the pandemic, and the association became even stronger for occupations in the middle of the remote work distribution following the pandemic surge in work from home. Overall, our findings suggest that manager trust is a crucial prerequisite for high sustained levels of remote work.

Suggested Citation

  • Gill, Adam & Nordström Skans, Oskar, 2024. "Trusted from Home: Managerial Beliefs and Workers' Spatial Autonomy," IZA Discussion Papers 17468, IZA Network @ LISER.
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp17468.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dingel, Jonathan I. & Neiman, Brent, 2020. "How many jobs can be done at home?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. José María Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis, 2023. "The Evolution of Work from Home," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 23-50, Fall.
    3. Lawrence F. Katz, 1986. "Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, Volume 1, pages 235-290, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & Ruobing Han & James Liang, 2024. "Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8018), pages 920-925, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Bloom & Gordon B. Dahl & Dan-Olof Rooth, 2024. "Work from Home and Disability Employment," NBER Working Papers 32943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Jean-Victor Alipour, 2026. "Performance Pay in the Hybrid Work Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 12680, CESifo.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Gordon B. Dahl & Dan-Olof Rooth, 2026. "Work from Home and Disability Employment," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 179-195, June.
    4. Yue Qian & Wen Fan, 2026. "Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Make It Worse? Working from Home and Affective Well-Being at the Intersections of Parental Status and Occupation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(2), pages 310-332, March.
    5. Artz, Benjamin & Siemers, Sarinda & Li, Tianfang, 2025. "Work-from-Home Desires in the Post-COVID Workplace: Managerial and Gender Heterogeneity," IZA Discussion Papers 18089, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Jiang, Mingyu & Yasui, Kengo & Yugami, Kazufumi, 2024. "Working from home, job tasks, and productivity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8).
    7. Basso, Gaetano & De Paola, Maria & Lattanzio, Salvatore & Paradisi, Matteo, 2026. "Workplace Flexibility and the Motherhood Penalty: Evidence from the Diffusion of Remote Work," CEPR Discussion Papers 21486, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Norman Guo & Wei Jiang & Yaswanth Pothuru & Baozhong Yang, 2026. "Mapping the Midweek Mountain: The New Geography of Hybrid Work," Papers 2603.18440, arXiv.org.
    9. Rost Vincent & Erdsiek Daniel, 2026. "Gekommen, um zu bleiben: Homeoffice verstetigt sich auf hohem Niveau," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 106(3), pages 221-225.
    10. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Katelyn Cranney & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2026. "Work from Home and Fertility," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 839, Asian Development Bank.
    11. Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The Allocation of Time and Remote Work," CESifo Working Paper Series 12363, CESifo.
    12. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Karel Mertens & Hannah Rubinton, 2024. "Work from Home and Migration," Working Papers 2024-012, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, revised 25 Jun 2026.
    13. Benjamin W. Cowan & Todd R. Jones, 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12117, CESifo.
    14. Adrjan, Pawel & Ciminelli, Gabriele & Judes, Alexandre & Koelle, Michael & Schwellnus, Cyrille & Sinclair, Tara M., 2025. "Working from home after COVID-19: Evidence from job postings in 20 countries," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Aidan Caplan & Tristan Caplan, 2025. "Measuring Trends in Work from Home: Evidence from Six U.S. Datasets," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 107(15), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Cowan, Benjamin & Jones, Todd R., 2025. "Social Substitution? Time Use Responses to Increased Workplace Isolation," IZA Discussion Papers 18112, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. David R. Agrawal & Xinyu Chen, 2026. "State and Local Tax Policy in a Time of Telework," CESifo Working Paper Series 12422, CESifo.
    18. Nicole Nestoriak & David H. Oh, 2026. "Work from Home: A Task-Based Perspective," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Yunhan Zheng & Jinhua Zhao, 2026. "Remote work expands pathways to upward career mobility," Papers 2605.01268, arXiv.org.
    20. Jorck, Gerrit von & Börger, Tobias & Ghirardello, Linda & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Praetorius, Barbara, 2025. "The impact of work arrangements on the choice to work from home: a discrete-continuous choice experiment," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 59, pages 1-029.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.