IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/202502111736540000.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Essays on precautionary seed demand, agricultural commodity price volatility, and the adoption and diffusion of genetically modified crops

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yue

Abstract

This dissertation explores three dimensions of U.S. agricultural production: farmers' decision-making under risk, market volatility, and the diffusion of genetically modified (GM) crops. The first paper investigates the impact of precautionary motives on optimal corn seeding rates, demonstrating their limited influence compared to savings and asset decisions. The conceptual model shows that precautionary motives increase seeding rates when seeds reduce yield risk and decrease them when seeds increase yield risk. Analysis of Ohio and Illinois field data reveals a U-shaped yield risk response to seeding rates. Simulations indicate a 0.2% seeding rate increase in Ohio and a 0.19% decrease in Illinois due to precautionary motives, while yield insurance reduces optimal seeding rates in both states by up to 2%. The second paper examines the impacts of biofuel policies, globalization in crop production, and agricultural technology adoption on the option-implied volatility (IV) of harvest-season corn and soybean futures contracts. We find that corn IV has consistently been higher than soybean IV, especially after 2005. This difference is driven by three main factors: crop riskiness, production globalization, and biofuel policies. First, corn is more sensitive to heat shocks than soybean, indicating it is a riskier crop. Second, U.S. biofuel policies have raised corn IV, while globalization has largely offset this effect. In contrast, greater globalization in soybean production has helped significantly reduce soybean IV. Consequently, we find that soybean’s price elasticity of demand increased significantly after 2005, while corn’s elasticity remained stable, contributing to lower soybean IV. The adoption of genetically modified (GM) corn and soybean varieties has increased yields and reduced yield variability, though we find mixed evidence regarding GM crops’ impact on IV. Finally, higher storage levels and a stronger U.S. dollar correlate with reduced IV, while a higher VIX index and interest rates correlate with increased IV. These findings underscore the complex role of policy, global markets, and crop characteristics in shaping agricultural volatility. The third paper analyzes the diffusion and adoption patterns of GM corn and soybean across time, regions, and farm categories, exploring factors that influence these processes. Results show a steady increase in the adoption rates of herbicide-tolerant (HT) soybean, HT corn, and corn borer-resistant (CB) corn. Notably, there has been a significant dis-adoption of rootworm-resistant (RW) corn since the 2010s, likely due to insects’ resistance development. This dis-adoption trend also correlates with increased insecticide use for corn rootworm control. Significant spatial differences are observed in the adoption of GM corn, while HT soybean shows small regional variation. HT soybean was adopted faster in southern states, and HT and CB corn were initially adopted in western Corn Belt states before spreading eastward, whereas RW corn adoption began in regions with high continuous corn intensity. Additionally, larger farms adopted GM traits earlier than smaller farms, generating spillover effects that promoted the adoption of smaller farms. Higher crop prices significantly accelerated adoption, as they enhanced profitability, with smaller farms exhibiting greater sensitivity and responsiveness to price changes. These findings underscore the complex interactions between economic incentives, regional characteristics, and farm sizes in shaping GM crop adoption patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yue, 2025. "Essays on precautionary seed demand, agricultural commodity price volatility, and the adoption and diffusion of genetically modified crops," ISU General Staff Papers 202502111736540000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202502111736540000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2ca9b991-b0cb-4dd4-b70d-7fbc57a884f6/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. H. Peyton Young, 2009. "Innovation Diffusion in Heterogeneous Populations: Contagion, Social Influence, and Social Learning," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1899-1924, December.
    4. Annemie Maertens & Christopher B. Barrett, 2013. "Measuring Social Networks' Effects on Agricultural Technology Adoption," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(2), pages 353-359.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edouard Civel & Marc Baudry, 2018. "The Fate of Inventions. What can we learn from Bayesian learning in strategic options model of adoption ?," EconomiX Working Papers 2018-47, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    2. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    3. Shang, Linmei & Heckelei, Thomas & Gerullis, Maria K. & Börner, Jan & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Donmez, Birsen & Matson, Zannah & Savan, Beth & Farahani, Ellie & Photiadis, David & Dafoe, Joanna, 2014. "Interruption management and office norms: Technology adoption lessons from a product commercialization study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 741-750.
    5. Cantono, Simona, 2012. "Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201222, University of Turin.
    6. Hidayatno, Akhmad & Jafino, Bramka Arga & Setiawan, Andri D. & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu, 2020. "When and why does transition fail? A model-based identification of adoption barriers and policy vulnerabilities for transition to natural gas vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Robinson, Scott A. & Rai, Varun, 2015. "Determinants of spatio-temporal patterns of energy technology adoption: An agent-based modeling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 273-284.
    8. Flachsbarth, Insa & Grassnick, Nina & Masood, Amjad & Bruemmer, Bernhard, 2018. "The Uneven Spread of Private Food Quality Standards over Time and Space," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274197, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Marcel Fafchamps & Måns Söderbom & Monique van den Boogart, 2022. "Adoption with Social Learning and Network Externalities," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1259-1282, December.
    10. Derbyshire, James & Giovannetti, Emanuele, 2017. "Understanding the failure to understand New Product Development failures: Mitigating the uncertainty associated with innovating new products by combining scenario planning and forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 334-344.
    11. Tsakas, Nikolas, 2024. "Optimal influence under observational learning," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 41-51.
    12. Nurwidiana Nurwidiana & Bertha Maya Sopha & Adhika Widyaparaga, 2022. "Simulating Socio-Technical Transitions of Photovoltaics Using Empirically Based Hybrid Simulation-Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Cem Keskin & M. Pınar Mengüç, 2018. "On Occupant Behavior and Innovation Studies Towards High Performance Buildings: A Transdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-33, October.
    14. H Peyton Young & Lucas Merrill Brown, 2016. "The Diffusion of a Social Innovation: Executive Stock Options from 1936," Economics Series Working Papers 777, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    15. Valentin Ngadi, 2016. "Factors Affecting The Adoption Of The Personality Of Design [Les Facteurs Determinants De La Diffusion/Adoption De La Personnalite Du Design]," Working Papers hal-01296338, HAL.
    16. Diana A. Londoño-Pulgarín & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Esmeralda Crespo-Almendros, 2020. "Conversion of Residential Heating Systems from Fossil Fuels to Biofuels: A Cross-Cultural Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Mira Frick & Yuhta Ishii, 2015. "Innovation Adoption by Forward-Looking Social Learners," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1877, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    18. Zhu, Z.;, 2023. "The Value of Patients: Heterogenous Physician Learning and Generic Drug Diffusion," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/12, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    19. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    20. Sharad Goel & Ashton Anderson & Jake Hofman & Duncan J. Watts, 2016. "The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 180-196, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:202502111736540000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.