IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/termod/202512.html

From Funding to Frontier: Public R&D and AI Innovation Across European Regions

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the growing role of these technologies in enhancing productivity have attracted significant research and policy attention, yet the determinants of AI innovation remain relatively understudied. This study contributes to this emerging literature by examining the role of public R&D spending in fostering AI-related innovation across EU regions. Our analysis draws on bibliographic information from all patents registered at the European Patent Office (EPO) between 1980 and 2023. Using textual analysis of patent abstracts, we identify the share of AI patents among total patents and construct a novel dataset that allocates AI patents to NUTS-2 regions based on inventor addresses. This regional mapping enables us to assess the impact of public R&D funding on AI innovation while addressing endogeneity concerns by instrumenting regional public R&D spending with national defence-related R&D expenditure. The results show that public R&D plays a significant role in driving AI innovation: a 1% increase in public R&D spending raises AI patent output by approximately 0.27%. These findings speak directly to Europe’s innovation policy framework, providing evidence that public investment remains a powerful lever for stimulating AI development. They also reinforce the rationale for sustained funding under Horizon Europe, the Digital Europe Programme, and national innovation strategies aimed at building technological and reducing regional disparities in AI advancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenidis Anastasios & Fasianos Apostolos & Papapanagiotou George & Lazarou Nicholas Joseph, 2025. "From Funding to Frontier: Public R&D and AI Innovation Across European Regions," JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis 2025-12, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:termod:202512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC144655
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    2. Kirill Borusyak & Peter Hull & Xavier Jaravel, 2025. "A Practical Guide to Shift-Share Instruments," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 181-204, Winter.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Céline Antonin & Simon Bunel, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence, Growth and Employment: The Role of Policy," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 510-511-5, pages 149-164.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    5. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & David Hémous & Morten Olsen & Carlo Zanella, 2021. "Induced automation: evidence from firm-level patent data," ECON - Working Papers 384, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    6. Alexander M. Danzer & Carsten Feuerbaum & Fabian Gaessler, 2020. "Labor Supply and Automation Innovation," Working Papers 198, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    7. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 197-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Miyamoto, Wataru & Nguyen, Thuy Lan & Sheremirov, Viacheslav, 2019. "The effects of government spending on real exchange rates: Evidence from military spending panel data," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 144-157.
    9. John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2013. "Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 347-361, May.
    10. Timothy J. Bartik, 1991. "Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number wbsle.
    11. Guerzoni, Marco & Raiteri, Emilio, 2015. "Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 726-747.
    12. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    13. Draca, Mirko, 2013. "Reagan’s Innovation Dividend? Technological Impacts of the 1980s US Defense Build-Up," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 168, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    14. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series dp-298, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    15. Bottazzi, Laura & Peri, Giovanni, 2003. "Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 687-710, August.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7n49nkmngd8448a5ts5gt5ade0 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pallante, Gianluca & Russo, Emanuele & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Does public R&D funding crowd-in private R&D investment? Evidence from military R&D expenditures for US states," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    2. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Gianluca Pallante & Emanuele Russo & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states," Working Papers hal-04097530, HAL.
    4. Ali Sina Önder & Sascha Schweitzer & Olga Tcaci, 2024. "Innovation and Regional Development: The Impact of Patenting on Labor Market Outcomes," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2024-07, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    5. Howell, Sabrina T. & Rathje, Jason & Van Reenen, John & Wong, Jun, 2021. "Opening up Military Innovation: Causal Effects of 'Bottom-up' Reforms to U.S. Defense Research," IZA Discussion Papers 14297, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Mahuaqing Zuo & Yuhan Zhao & Shasha Yu, 2024. "Industrial robot applications and individual migration decision: evidence from households in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Stojčić, Nebojša & Srhoj, Stjepan & Coad, Alex, 2020. "Innovation procurement as capability-building: Evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern European countries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    9. Sabrina T. Howell & Jason Rathje & John Van Reenen & Jun Wong, 2025. "Opening Up Military Innovation: Causal Effects of Reforms to US Defense Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(11), pages 3605-3651.
    10. Qureshi, Irfan & Park, Donghyun & Crespi, Gustavo Atilio & Benavente, Jose Miguel, 2021. "Trends and determinants of innovation in Asia and the Pacific vs. Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1287-1309.
    11. Simon Bruhn & Thomas Grebel, 2025. "Allocative Efficiency, Plant Dynamics and Regional Productivity: Evidence from Germany," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 48(1), pages 62-91, January.
    12. Zhu, Jun & Zhang, Jingting & Feng, Yiqing, 2022. "Hard budget constraints and artificial intelligence technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Makridis, Christos A. & McGuire, Erin, 2023. "The quality of innovation “Booms” during “Busts”," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    14. Alessandra Colombelli & Elettra D’Amico & Emilio Paolucci, 2023. "When computer science is not enough: universities knowledge specializations behind artificial intelligence startups in Italy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1599-1627, October.
    15. Theresa Gullo & Benjamin Page & David Weiner & Heidi L. Williams, 2024. "Estimating the Economic and Budgetary Effects of Research Investments," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 39, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Luca Spinesi, "undated". "How innovation and heterogenous human capital shape wealth and income inequality," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0290, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    17. Brown, J. David & Denes, Matthew & Duchin, Ran & Hackney, John, 2024. "How Big Is Small? The Economic Effects of Access to Small Business Subsidies," IZA Discussion Papers 17092, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Pascal Stiefenhofer, 2025. "Artificial General Intelligence and the Social Contract: A Dynamic Political Economy Model," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 4(3), pages 142-183, September.
    19. Yoshiki Ando, 2024. "Dynamics of High-Growth Young Firms and the Role of Venture Capitalists," PIER Working Paper Archive 24-012, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    20. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Roger Svensson, 2024. "Inventions, commercialization strategies, and knowledge spillovers in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 275-297, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:termod:202512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.