IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc141962.html

Review of the FIDELIO model: A New Generation of Dynamic, Econometric and General Equilibrium Input-Output Model

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This technical report reviews the FIDELIO model, a dynamic, econometric, and general equilibrium input-output model developed by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. The review was conducted by a panel of experts to assess the model's scientific rigour, data foundation, empirical implementation, and peer-review status, in line with the EU's Better Regulation Policy and the Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Law Making. The FIDELIO model is designed to estimate the socio-economic and environmental impacts of EU industrial, trade and innovation policies for a fair and sustainable EU economy, mostly oriented to demand policies but also flexible to incorporate supply policy shocks, too. It is built on a solid foundation of the FIGARO database, which is maintained by Eurostat, and aims to capture spillover and rebound effects to quantify impacts on jobs, growth, investments, resource use, emissions, and trade balance. The model has evolved through several versions, with the latest iteration featuring improvements in modularity, flexibility, and dynamic structure. The review panel's general comments commend the model's comprehensive approach, which blurs the lines between traditional IO systems, econometric IO systems, and computable general equilibrium models. The panel appreciates the model's disaggregation of industries and households, which allows for granular analysis. However, the panel also points out the need for regular updates to the FIGARO database, transparent documentation of empirical implementation, and continuous exposure of the model to the scientific community and policymakers. Specific comments from individual panel members address various aspects of the model, including the need for a clear statement of the EU policy objectives of the European Union where FIDELIO will have to be applied, the suitability of the model for contributing to well-being measures, and the importance of capturing the dynamics of competition and market power. The panel also suggests improvements in the treatment of technological change, flexibility, and substitutability, as well as the integration of financial accounts and regional integration, qualitative changes in the economy, demographic challenges, and micro-macro links within the model. In response to the review, the FIDELIO team has proposed several lines of action to enhance the model's capabilities. These include updating the FIGARO database, refining parameter estimation and calibration, exploring new production functions, incorporating firm heterogeneity, and developing a FIDELIO community for collaborative development and use of the model. The team also plans to publish a flagship article on the model and maintain transparent documentation to facilitate knowledge transfer within the team. The FIDELIO model is a critical tool for EU policy analysis, with the review providing valuable insights for its improvement. The proposed actions by the FIDELIO team aim to address the panel's recommendations and ensure the model. Overall, the FIDELIO model presents a comprehensive and transparent tool for analysing EU policy impacts in the European economy, with potential areas for further refinement and extensions to address evolving complexities and improve its credibility and applicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hewings Geoffrey J.d & Cardenete Manuel Alejandro & Duarte Rosa & Kurz Heinz D. & Ten Raa Thijs & Rueda Cantuche Jose Manuel & Pedauga Luis & Pinero Mira Pablo & Banacloche Sanchez Santacruz & Lopez A, 2026. "Review of the FIDELIO model: A New Generation of Dynamic, Econometric and General Equilibrium Input-Output Model," JRC Research Reports JRC141962, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc141962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC141962
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mr. Federico J Diez & Mr. Davide Malacrino & Mr. Ippei Shibata, 2022. "The Divergent Dynamics of Labor Market Power in Europe," IMF Working Papers 2022/247, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Duarte, Rosa & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio & Sarasa, Cristina, 2018. "Consumer-side actions in a low-carbon economy: A dynamic CGE analysis for Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 199-210.
    3. Paola Rocchi & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche & Alicia Boyano & Alejandro Villanueva, 2019. "Macroeconomic Effects of EU Energy Efficiency Regulations on Household Dishwashers, Washing Machines and Washer Dryers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Budy P. Resosudarmo & Luky Eko Wuryanto & Geoffrey J. Hewings & Lindsay Saunders, 1999. "Decentralization and Income Distribution in the Inter-Regional Indonesian Economy," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & Moss Madden & Yoshio Kimura (ed.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure, chapter 15, pages 297-315, Springer.
    5. Karen Turner & Soo Jung Ha & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Peter Mcgregor & Kim Swales, 2012. "Econometric Estimation Of Armington Import Elasticities For A Regional Cge Model Of The Illinois Economy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Kim, Euijune & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Amir, Hidayat, 2017. "Economic evaluation of transportation projects: An application of Financial Computable General Equilibrium model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 44-55.
    7. Javier Barbero & Martin Christensen & Paola Rocchi, 2022. "The Economic Benefits of Eliminating the Regulatory Restrictiveness of Heavily Regulated Business Services in the European Union," Scienze Regionali, Società editrice il Mulino, issue Speciale, pages 99-126.
    8. Bolea, Lucía & Duarte, Rosa & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio, 2021. "Disintegration scenarios in the European Union: A case study of Eastern European economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Esteban Fernandez Vazquez & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Carmen Ramos Carvajal, 2015. "Adjustment of Input-Output Tables from Two Initial Matrices," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 345-361, September.
    10. Shubhdeep Deb & Jan Eeckhout & Aseem Patel & Lawrence Warren, 2022. "Market Power And Wage Inequality," Working Papers 22-37, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    11. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Jin, Hui & Slesnick, Daniel T. & Wilcoxen, Peter J., 2013. "An Econometric Approach to General Equilibrium Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1133-1212, Elsevier.
    12. Lucía Bolea & Rosa Duarte & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Sofía Jiménez & Julio Sánchez‐Chóliz, 2022. "The role of regions in global value chains: an analysis for the European Union," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 771-794, August.
    13. David Vines & Samuel Wills, 2018. "The rebuilding macroeconomic theory project: an analytical assessment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 34(1-2), pages 1-42.
    14. Olivier Blanchard, 2018. "On the future of macroeconomic models," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 34(1-2), pages 43-54.
    15. Angel Aguiar & Maksym Chepeliev & Erwin L. Corong & Robert McDougall & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2019. "The GTAP Data Base: Version 10," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forrest Jeffrey Yi-Lin & Gong Zaiwu & Köse Erkan & Galbraith Diane D. & Arık Oğuzhan A., 2021. "An Economy’s Emergent Properties and How Micro Agents with Inconsistent or Conflicting Interests Are Holistically Organized into Macro Entities," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 67(3), pages 53-66, September.
    2. Moučka, Jakub & Němec, Daniel, 2025. "Improving macroeconomic model credibility: Reducing reliance on frictions through observed inflation expectations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Jochen O. Mierau & Mark Mink, 2018. "A Descriptive Model of Banking and Aggregate Demand," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 207-237, June.
    4. Emre Örün, 2020. "Theoritical Seekings in Macroeconomics," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 70(2), pages 451-477, December.
    5. Ciccarelli, Matteo & Darracq Pariès, Matthieu & Priftis, Romanos & Angelini, Elena & Bańbura, Marta & Bokan, Nikola & Fagan, Gabriel & Gumiel, José Emilio & Kornprobst, Antoine & Lalik, Magdalena & Mo, 2024. "ECB macroeconometric models for forecasting and policy analysis," Occasional Paper Series 344, European Central Bank.
    6. Rafael R. S. Guimaraes, 2022. "Deep Learning Macroeconomics," Papers 2201.13380, arXiv.org.
    7. Yizhou Zhang & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2019. "Fiscal Decentralization – A Cautious Tale," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 173-187, March.
    8. Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate, Casiano & Santana Gallego, María & Valle, Elisabeth Valle, 2022. "The economic impact of global uncertainty and security threats on international tourism," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.
    10. Schoder, Christian, 2020. "A Keynesian Dynamic Stochastic Disequilibrium model for business cycle analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 117-132.
    11. Eugenio Caverzasi & Alberto Russo, 2018. "Toward a new microfounded macroeconomics in the wake of the crisis," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 999-1014.
    12. Colmenares, Gloria & Löschel, Andreas & Madlener, Reinhard, 2019. "The rebound effect and its representation in energy and climate models," CAWM Discussion Papers 106, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    13. Shobande Olatunji Abdul & Shodipe Oladimeji Tomiwa, 2019. "New Keynesian Liquidity Trap and Conventional Fiscal Stance: An Estimated DSGE Model," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 152-169, January.
    14. Finn Olesen, 2025. "Teaching Macroeconomics Using a Multi-paradigmatic, Problem-Based Learning Approach," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 513-526, September.
    15. Federico Guglielmo Morelli & Michael Benzaquen & Marco Tarzia & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2020. "Confidence collapse in a multihousehold, self-reflexive DSGE model," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(17), pages 9244-9249, April.
    16. Hafner, Marco & Yerushalmi, Erez & Andersson, Fredrik L. & Burtea, Teodor, 2020. "Quantifying the macroeconomic cost of night-time bathroom visits: an application to the UK," CAFE Working Papers 5, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    17. Bekkers, Eddy & Corong, Erwin L. & Smith, Donal & Yu, Roger So & Zhao, Danchen, 2026. "Impact assessment of the Investment Facilitation for Development (IFD) Agreement," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2026-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    18. Boscá, J.E. & Doménech, R. & Ferri, J. & Méndez, R. & Rubio-Ramírez, J.F., 2020. "Financial and fiscal shocks in the great recession and recovery of the Spanish economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Philippidis, George & M'Barek, Robert & Urban-Boysen, Kirsten & Van Zeist, Willem-Jan, 2023. "Exploring economy-wide sustainable conditions for EU bio-chemical activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Albonico, Alice & Calés, Ludovic & Cardani, Roberta & Croitorov, Olga & Ferroni, Filippo & Giovannini, Massimo & Hohberger, Stefan & Pataracchia, Beatrice & Pericoli, Filippo Maria & Raciborski, Rafal, 2019. "Comparing post-crisis dynamics across Euro Area countries with the Global Multi-country model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 242-273.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc141962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.