IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i4d10.1007_s10668-023-03115-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: competition between green, non-green and semi-green transportation networks under government sustainable policies

Author

Listed:
  • Nafiseh Fallahi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Ashkan Hafezalkotob

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Sadigh Raissi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Vahidreza Ghezavati

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

Sustainable development in freight transportation networks is becoming increasingly important due to its significant role in the economic development process and its impacts on the environment. Governments usually improve sustainability dimensions in freight transportation by imposing taxes on transportation networks. Therefore, they should extend their knowledge of interactions between sustainability dimensions and how their interventions affect the sustainability of the transportation sector. In this regard, we analyze duopoly competition in three freight transportation networks in the context of government intervention. These networks include green, semi-green, and non-green modes, where the green and semi-green networks are regarded as environmentally sustainable networks. In this paper, two bi-level mathematical models are proposed, in which a government, as a Stackelberg leader, levies fuel consumption taxes based on environmental and economic concerns. A Nash game was built at the lower level to examine price competitiveness in the transportation market. A case study was conducted in the Tehran-Esfahan freight transportation networks (Iran). Due to the complexity of the bi-level models, the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker approach was adopted to unify the models. Finally, the relevant calculations were performed based on actual information. The results of the problems in the case study showed the economic and environmental dimensions are contradictory and that the government’s minimization of economic risks aids in ensuring environmental sustainability. Also, improving energy efficiency in transportation networks can have negative environmental consequences. However, when accompanied by government intervention, improving energy efficiency effectively reduces the fuel consumption rate. Moreover, government support will reduce total fuel consumption by reducing green vehicle fuel taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafiseh Fallahi & Ashkan Hafezalkotob & Sadigh Raissi & Vahidreza Ghezavati, 2024. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: competition between green, non-green and semi-green transportation networks under government sustainable policies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 9711-9758, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03115-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03115-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03115-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03115-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Euijune & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Amir, Hidayat, 2017. "Economic evaluation of transportation projects: An application of Financial Computable General Equilibrium model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 44-55.
    2. Mostafa Parsa & Ali Shahandeh Nookabadi & Zümbül Atan, 2020. "A joint economic lot-size model for sustainable industries of recycled content products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7439-7470, December.
    3. Karray, Salma & Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2015. "A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-100.
    4. Wang, Hua & Wang, Xinchang & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2017. "Dynamic resource allocation for intermodal freight transportation with network effects: Approximations and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 83-112.
    5. Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for car pricing and its energy efficiency level versus governmental sustainability goals by considering rebound effect: A case study of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Yuntao Guo & Srinivas Peeta & Fred Mannering, 2016. "Rail-truck multimodal freight collaboration: a statistical analysis of freight-shipper perspectives," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 484-506, July.
    7. Mohammad Tamannaei & Hamid Zarei & Sajede Aminzadegan, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Freight Transportation Pricing Problem in the Presence of Intermodal Service Providers in a Competitive Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 123-173, March.
    8. de Rus, Ginés & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2014. "Access pricing, infrastructure investment and intermodal competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 374-387.
    9. Adler, Nicole & Brudner, Amir & Proost, Stef, 2021. "A review of transport market modeling using game-theoretic principles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 808-829.
    10. David Austin, 2015. "Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs: Working Paper 2015-03," Working Papers 50049, Congressional Budget Office.
    11. Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2021. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 272-295.
    12. Mateusz Cichenski & Florian Jaehn & Grzegorz Pawlak & Erwin Pesch & Gaurav Singh & Jacek Blazewicz, 2017. "An integrated model for the transshipment yard scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-65, February.
    13. Demir, Emrah & Burgholzer, Wolfgang & Hrušovský, Martin & Arıkan, Emel & Jammernegg, Werner & Woensel, Tom Van, 2016. "A green intermodal service network design problem with travel time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 789-807.
    14. Lucija Bukvić & Jasmina Pašagić Škrinjar & Borna Abramović & Vladislav Zitrický, 2021. "Route Selection Decision-Making in an Intermodal Transport Network Using Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Qiang Meng & Zhiyuan Liu, 2011. "Trial-and-error method for congestion pricing scheme under side-constrained probit-based stochastic user equilibrium conditions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 819-843, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2021. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 272-295.
    2. Rategh, Yalda & Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach to an oligopolistic transportation market: Coopetition between incumbent systems subject to the entrance threat of an HSR service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 144-171.
    3. Mostafa Pazoki & Hamed Samarghandi & Mehdi Behroozi, 2023. "Increasing Supply Chain Resiliency Through Equilibrium Pricing and Stipulating Transportation Quota Regulation," Papers 2308.00681, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    4. Wen, Haosong & Zhao, De & Yu, Weijie & Chen, Jun & Wang, Wei, 2024. "A multi-stage game framework for new route promotion: Behavioral strategy and dynamic evolution of shippers, carriers, and governments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 375-391.
    5. Hasani Goodarzi, Asefeh & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Paquet, Marc, 2024. "Evaluating the sustainability and resilience of an intermodal transport network leveraging consolidation strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed & Behroozi, Mehdi, 2024. "Increasing supply chain resiliency through equilibrium pricing and stipulating transportation quota regulation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Archetti, Claudia & Peirano, Lorenzo & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2022. "Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 1-20.
    8. Guo, Wenjing & Atasoy, Bilge & van Blokland, Wouter Beelaerts & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2021. "Global synchromodal transport with dynamic and stochastic shipment matching," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Wang, Yixiao & Pels, Eric & Teunter, Ruud H. & Sun, Luoyi & Wu, Jianhong, 2023. "Railway liberalization, airport congestion toll, and infrastructure pricing: Modelling and numerical analysis for European and Chinese markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Guanqiao Pan & Hongchao Jiang & Qianhui Jin & Tianyi Zhao & Jiajun Wang & Li Wang, 2021. "Study on the Sharing Transportation Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Alexandra TUDORICA & Cristian Silviu BANACU, 2018. "A Review Of Public Measures For Supporting The Development Of Rail-Road Intermodal Freight Transport In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 165-173, November.
    12. Amiri-Pebdani, Sima & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing in competitive energy supply chains considering government interventions to support CCS under cap-and-trade regulations: A game-theoretic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    14. Ginés de Rus, 2014. "The economic evaluation of infrastructure investment. Some inescapable tradeoffs," Working Papers 2014-16, FEDEA.
    15. Kuang, Zhonghong & Lian, Zeng & Lien, Jaimie W. & Zheng, Jie, 2020. "Serial and parallel duopoly competition in multi-segment transportation routes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Yue Lu & Maoxiang Lang & Xueqiao Yu & Shiqi Li, 2019. "A Sustainable Multimodal Transport System: The Two-Echelon Location-Routing Problem with Consolidation in the Euro–China Expressway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Deriu, S. & Cassar, I.P. & Pretaroli, R. & Socci, C., 2022. "The economic impact of Covid-19 pandemic in Sardinia," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Tareq Abu Aisha & Mustapha Ouhimmou & Marc Paquet, 2020. "Optimization of Container Terminal Layouts in the Seaport—Case of Port of Montreal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Dugan, Anna & Mayer, Jakob & Thaller, Annina & Bachner, Gabriel & Steininger, Karl W., 2022. "Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Li, Zhaojin & Liu, Ya & Yang, Zhen, 2021. "An effective kernel search and dynamic programming hybrid heuristic for a multimodal transportation planning problem with order consolidation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03115-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.