IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Alternative Strategien der Budgetkonsolidierung in Österreich nach der Rezession

Listed author(s):
  • Achim Truger


    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) at Hans Boeckler Foundation, Duesseldorf)

  • Katja Rietzler


    (rietzler economics)

  • Henner Will


    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) at Hans Boeckler Foundation, Duesseldorf)

  • Rudolf Zwiener


    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) at Hans Boeckler Foundation, Duesseldorf)

The study develops a budget consolidation strategy for Austria that does not endanger the fragile recovery while at the same time promoting distrbutional justice. As a first step a literature review on the macroeconomic effects of discreationary fiscal policy is given. As a second step two country case studies are discussed. The failed attempts at budget consolidation in Germany during the stagnation period from 2001 to 2005 on the one hand and the successful consolidation period in the U.S. from 1993 to 2000. Against the background of the results conclusions for the future Austrian consolidation strategy are drawn: Instead of putting the recovery at risk by overambitious discreationary consolidation measures from 2011 onwards, consolidation alongside a more or less neutral expenditure growth path for discreationary giverment spending at about 3 to 3.5 per cent is recommended. Consolidation would primarily be achieved through automatic stabilisers. Compared with the currently envisaged tough restriction the solution proposed here would lead to a significantly better growth and labour market performance while at the same time not severly doing harm to the consolidation goal. If nevertheless there is a political preference for faster consolidation, this should be achieved via revenue-side measures as they usually are less harmful to growth and employment. This will be particularly the case if those taxes are increased that concentrate on high income/property households.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute in its series IMK Studies with number 02-2010.

in new window

Length: 102 pages
Date of creation: 2010
Handle: RePEc:imk:studie:02-2010
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Hans-Böckler-Straße 39, 40476 Düsseldorf

Phone: +49 211 7778 234
Fax: +49 211 7778 4234
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imk:studie:02-2010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Nemitz)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.