IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imk/report/85-2013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Außenhandel der USA

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Behringer

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Nikolaus Kowall

Abstract

Die USA haben zwischen 1999 und 2012 ihre Handelsverflechtungen mit dem Ausland intensiviert. Aufgrund der kräftigen Expansion des gesamten Welthandels haben die USA jedoch Weltmarktanteile verloren. Seit Mitte der 1970er Jahre ist der Außenhandelssaldo der USA nahezu ununterbrochen negativ, so dass sich mittlerweile beträchtliche Nettoauslandsverbindlichkeiten aufgebaut haben. Die wichtigsten Handelspartner der USA waren in den vergangenen Jahren Süd- und Ostasien sowie die NAFTA-Länder Mexiko und Kanada. Insbesondere China hat als Handelspartner für die USA stark an Bedeutung gewonnen, während das Gewicht Japans abgenommen hat. Die EU ist nach Süd- und Ostasien sowie der NAFTA der drittwichtigste Handelspartner der USA, hat in den vergangenen Jahren sowohl einfuhr- als auch ausfuhrseitig jedoch an Bedeutung verloren. Insofern sind von einem Freihandelsabkommen mit der EU keine kurzfristigen konjunkturellen Impulse für die USA zu erwarten. Darüber hinaus sind die USA eine relativ geschlossene Volkswirtschaft, in der eine Belebung der Konjunktur aus der Binnenwirtschaft kommen muss. Die US-Exporte haben sich aufgrund der hohen Wachstumsdynamik im Warenverkehr mit China und Mexiko rasch vom krisenbedingten Einbruch erholt. Die Importnachfrage der USA erholte sich hingegen zögerlicher.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Behringer & Nikolaus Kowall, 2013. "Außenhandel der USA," IMK Report 85-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:imk:report:85-2013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_imk_report_85_2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabian Lindner, 2013. "Banken treiben Eurokrise," IMK Report 82-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Sabine Stephan & Jonas Löbbing, 2013. "Außenhandel der der EU27," IMK Report 83-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    3. Gustav A. Horn & Sebastian Gechert & Alexander Herzog-Stein & Katja Rietzler & Silke Tober & Sabine Stephan & Andrew Watt, 2013. "Inmitten der Krise des Euroraums - Herausforderungen für die Wirtschaftspolitik 2013," IMK Report 79-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    4. Gabriel Felbermayr & Mario Larch & Finn Krüger & Lisandra Flach & Erdal Yalcin & Sebastian Benz, 2013. "Dimensionen und Auswirkungen eines Freihandelsabkommens zwischen der EU und den USA," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beck, Stefan & Scherrer, Christoph, 2014. "Das transatlantische Handels- und Investitionsabkommen (TTIP) zwischen der EU und den USA," Arbeitspapiere 303, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabine Stephan & Jonas Löbbing, 2013. "Außenhandel der der EU27," IMK Report 83-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Sabine Stephan & Jonas Löbbing, 2013. "Foreign trade of the EU27," IMK Report 83e-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    3. Buongiorno, Joseph & Rougieux, Paul & Barkaoui, Ahmed & Zhu, Shushuai & Harou, Patrice, 2014. "Potential impact of a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership on the global forest sector," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 252-266.
    4. Philipp M. Richter & Greta F. Schäffer, 2014. "Die Kontroverse um das Freihandelsabkommen TTIP," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 42, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Raza, Werner & Grumiller, Jan & Taylor, Lance & Tröster, Bernhard & von Arnim, Rudi, 2014. "ASSESS_TTIP: Assessing the claimed benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership," Policy Notes 10/2014, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    6. Alexander Herzog-Stein & Fabian Lindner & Rudolf Zwiener, 2013. "Is the supply side all that counts?," IMK Report 87e-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    7. Beck, Stefan & Scherrer, Christoph, 2014. "Das transatlantische Handels- und Investitionsabkommen (TTIP) zwischen der EU und den USA," Arbeitspapiere 303, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    8. Paul Welfens & Tony Irawan, 2014. "Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: sectoral and macroeconomic perspectives for Germany, the EU and the US," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 293-328, September.
    9. Patrick Grüning & Thomas Theobald & Till van Treeck, 2015. "Income inequality and Germany’s current account surplus," IMK Working Paper 147-2015, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    10. Gabriel Felbermayr & Mario Larch & Mario Larch, 2014. "Transatlantic Free Trade: Questions and Answers from the Vantage Point of Trade Theory," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(04), pages 03-17, January.
    11. Disdier, Anne‐Célia & Emlinger, Charlotte & Fouré, Jean, 2016. "Interdependencies between Atlantic and Pacific agreements: Evidence from agri-food sectors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 241-253.
    12. Oliver Krebs & Michael Pflüger, 2018. "How deep is your love? A quantitative spatial analysis of the transatlantic trade partnership," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 171-222, February.
    13. Wesseler, Justus, 2014. "Biotechnologies and agrifood strategies: opportunities, threats and economic implications," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 3(3), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Fabian Lindner, 2014. "Haben die knappen Weltersparnisse die US-Immobilienblase finanziert?," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 40(1), pages 33-61.
    15. Alexander Herzog-Stein & Fabian Lindner & Rudolf Zwiener, 2013. "Nur das Angebot zählt?," IMK Report 87-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    16. Anne-Célia Disdier & Charlotte Emlinger & Jean Fouré, 2015. "Atlantic versus Pacific Agreement in Agri-food Sectors: Does the Winner Take it All?," Working Papers halshs-01190840, HAL.
    17. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch & Erdal Yalcin, 2015. "Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: a high resolution perspective for Europe and the world," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 30(83), pages 491-537.
    18. Gabriel Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler & Rahel Aichele & Günther Klee & Erdal Yalcin, 2015. "Potential impact of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partner (TTIP) on developing and emerging countries," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 67.
    19. Bekkers, Eddy, 2019. "The welfare effects of trade policy experiments in quantitative trade models: The role of solution methods and baseline calibration," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2019-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    20. Johannes Schwarzer, 2015. "Services Trade and Employment," Discussion Notes 1502, Council on Economic Policies.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imk:report:85-2013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Nemitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imkhbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.