Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Reza Hosseini, 2020. "Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 349-366, December.
References listed on IDEAS
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri, 2022.
"Technology Protectionism and the Patent System: Evidence from China,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 1-43, March.
- Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri, 2020. "Technology protectionism and the patent system: Evidence from China," Working Papers 11, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
- Mark A. Lemley & Carl Shapiro, 2005. "Probabilistic Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 75-98, Spring.
- Palangkaraya, Alfons & Jensen, Paul H. & Webster, Elizabeth, 2017. "The effect of patents on trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-9.
- Karin Beukel & Minyuan Zhao, 2018. "IP litigation is local, but those who litigate are global," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 53-70, June.
- Masaaki Kotabe, 1992. "A Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Patent Systems," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(1), pages 147-168, March.
- Lehmann-Hasemeyer, Sibylle H. & Streb, Jochen, 2018. "Discrimination against Foreigners. The Wuerttemberg Patent Law in Administrative Practice," Working Papers 7, German Research Foundation's Priority Programme 1859 "Experience and Expectation. Historical Foundations of Economic Behaviour", Humboldt University Berlin.
- Maskus, Keith E. & Penubarti, Mohan, 1995. "How trade-related are intellectual property rights?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 227-248, November.
- Stuart J. H. Graham & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dietmar Harhoff & David C. Mowery, 2002.
"Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions,"
NBER Working Papers
8807, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Stuart J. H. Graham & Bronwyn H. Hall & Dietmar Harhoff & David C. Mowery, 2003. "Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions," Industrial Organization 0303009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Carlsson, Magnus & Rooth, Dan-Olof, 2007.
"Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labor market using experimental data,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 716-729, August.
- Carlsson, Magnus & Rooth, Dan-Olof, 2006. "Evidence of Ethnic Discrimination in the Swedish Labor Market Using Experimental Data," IZA Discussion Papers 2281, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Hélène Dernis & Geert Boedt, 2014.
"An Introduction to the Patstat Database with Example Queries,"
Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 47(3), pages 395-408, September.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Hélène Dernis & Geert Boedt, 2014. "An Introduction to the Patstat Database with Example Queries," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2014n08, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- Graham, Stuart J. H. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Harhoff, Dietmar & Mowery, David C., 2002. "Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt8bs830w9, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Liegsalz, Johannes & Wagner, Stefan, 2013.
"Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 552-563.
- Johannes Liegsalz & Stefan Wagner, 2011. "Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-11-06, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
- Dang, Jianwei & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2015. "Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 137-155.
- Tong, Tony W. & Zhang, Kun & He, Zi-Lin & Zhang, Yuchen, 2018. "What determines the duration of patent examination in China? An outcome-specific duration analysis of invention patent applications at SIPO," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 583-591.
- James A Brander & Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky, 2017. "China and intellectual property rights: A challenge to the rule of law," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 908-921, September.
- Lemley, Mark A. & Shapiro, Carl, 2004. "Probabilistic Patents," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt9xf1488p, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Marco, Alan C. & Sarnoff, Joshua D. & deGrazia, Charles A.W., 2019. "Patent claims and patent scope," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
- Graham, Stuart J.H. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Harhoff, Dietmar & Mowery, David C., 2002. "Post-Issue Patent “Quality Control:” A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt7931q79x, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004.
"Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 991-1013, September.
- Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2003. "Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination," NBER Working Papers 9873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2003. "Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination," Natural Field Experiments 00216, The Field Experiments Website.
- Stuart J.H. Graham & Alan C. Marco & Richard Miller, 2018. "The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A window on patent processing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 554-578, September.
- Yang, Deli, 2019. "National treatment, institutions and IP uncertainties: An analytics of compliance, change and comparability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
- Kaas Leo & Manger Christian, 2012.
"Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment,"
German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, February.
- Leo Kaas & Christian Manger, 2012. "Ethnic Discrimination in Germany's Labour Market: A Field Experiment," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, February.
- Kaas, Leo & Manger, Christian, 2010. "Ethnic Discrimination in Germany's Labour Market: A Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 4741, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Jana Drechsler & Jan-Thomas Bachmann & Andreas Engelen, 2019. "The effect of immigrants in the founding team on the international attention of new ventures," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 305-333, September.
- David Popp & Ted Juhl & Daniel K.N. Johnson, 2003. "Time in Purgatory: Determinants of the Grant Lag for U.S. Patent Applications," NBER Working Papers 9518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Adam B. Jaffe & Gaétan de Rassenfosse, 2017.
"Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices,"
Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(6), pages 1360-1374, June.
- Adam B. Jaffe & Gaétan de Rassenfosse, 2016. "Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices," NBER Working Papers 21868, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Palitha Konara & Alexander Mohr, 2019. "Why We Should Stop Using the Kogut and Singh Index," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 335-354, June.
- Dietmar Harhoff & Stefan Wagner, 2009. "The Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1969-1984, December.
- Paola Criscuolo, 2006. "The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 23-41, January.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & William E. Griffiths & Adam B. Jaffe & Elizabeth Webster, 2021.
"Low-Quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners,"
The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 607-636.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & William E. Griffiths & Adam B. Jaffe & Elizabeth Webster, 2016. "Low-quality Patents in the Eye of the Beholder: Evidence from Multiple Examiners," NBER Working Papers 22244, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gaetan de Rassenfosse & William Griffiths & Adam Jaffe & Elizabeth Webster, 2019. "Low-quality patents in the eye of the beholder: Evidence from multiple examiners," Working Papers 17, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
- Yang, Deli, 2008. "Pendency and grant ratios of invention patents: A comparative study of the US and China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 1035-1046, July.
- James Bessen & Michael J. Meurer, 2008. "Introduction to Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk," Introductory Chapters, in: Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton University Press.
- Graham, Stuart J. H. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Harhoff, Dietmar & Mowery, David C., 2002. "Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt2qt097bd, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Catalina Martínez, 2011. "Patent families: When do different definitions really matter?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 39-63, January.
- Graham, Stuart J.H. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Harhoff, Dietmar & Mowery, David C., 2002. "Post-Issue Patent “Quality Control:” A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt7931q79x, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Elizabeth Webster & Paul H. Jensen & Alfons Palangkaraya, 2014. "Patent examination outcomes and the national treatment principle," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 449-469, June.
- Boeing, Philipp & Mueller, Elisabeth, 2016. "Measuring patent quality in cross-country comparison," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-147.
- Yang, Deli & Sonmez, Mahmut (Maho), 2018. "Global norm of national treatment for patent uncertainties: A longitudinal comparison between the US and China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 164-176.
- Olena Ivus, 2015. "Does stronger patent protection increase export variety? Evidence from US product-level data," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 46(6), pages 724-731, August.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Paul H. Jensen & T’Mir Julius & Alfons Palangkaraya & Elizabeth Webster, 2019. "Are Foreigners Treated Equally under the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(4), pages 663-685.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Petit, Elise & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno & Gimeno-Fabra, Lluis, 2023.
"Are patent offices substitutes?,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
- Elise Petit & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe & Lluís Gimeno Fabra, 2021. "Are Patent Offices Substitutes ?," Working Papers TIMES² 2021-049, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Elise Petit & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe & Lluís Gimeno Fabra, 2021. "Are Patent Offices Substitutes?," Working Papers ECARES 2021-18, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Sahar Araghi & Alfons Palangkaraya & Elizabeth Webster, 2024. "The impact of language translation quality on commerce: The example of patents," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 224-246, June.
- Gaétan De Rassenfosse & Paul H. Jensen & T'Mir Julius & Alfons Palangkaraya & Elizabeth Webster, 2023.
"Is the Patent System an Even Playing Field? The Effect of Patent Attorney Firms,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 124-142, March.
- Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Paul Jensen & T'Mir Julius & Alfons Palangkaraya & Elizabeth Webster, 2021. "Is the patent system a level playing field? The effect of patent attorney firms," Working Papers 15, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
- Elise Petit & Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie & Lluis Gimeno-Fabra, 2022.
"Global patent systems: Revisiting the national bias hypothesis,"
Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 56-67, March.
- Elise Petit & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe & Lluís Gimeno Fabra, 2021. "Global Patent Systems: Revisiting the National Bias Hypothesis," Working Papers TIMES² 2021-050, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Elise Petit & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe & Lluís Gimeno Fabra, 2021. "Global Patent Systems: Revisiting the National Bias Hypothesis," Working Papers ECARES 2021-17, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Matthias Niggli, 2023. "‘Moving On’—investigating inventors’ ethnic origins using supervised learning," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 921-947.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri & Rudi Bekkers, 2023.
"Discrimination in the Patent System: Evidence from Standard-Essential Patents,"
Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(4), pages 739-763.
- Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri & Rudi Bekkers, 2023. "Discrimination in the patent system: Evidence from standard-essential patents," Working Papers 21, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
- Matthias Niggli, 2023. "‘Moving On’—investigating inventors’ ethnic origins using supervised learning," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 921-947.
- Li Yao & He Ni, 2023. "Prediction of patent grant and interpreting the key determinants: an application of interpretable machine learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 4933-4969, September.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Reza Hosseini, 0. "Discrimination against foreigners in the U.S. patent system," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
- Kwon, Seokbeom, 2021. "The prevalence of weak patents in the United States: A new method to identify weak patents and the implications for patent policy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
- Andrew Eckert & Corinne Langinier, 2014.
"A Survey Of The Economics Of Patent Systems And Procedures,"
Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 996-1015, December.
- Andrew Eckert & Corinne Langinier, 2014. "A Survey of the Economics of Patent Systems and Procedures," Working Papers 2014-10, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
- Lei, Zhen & Wright, Brian D., 2017. "Why weak patents? Testing the examiner ignorance hypothesis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 43-56.
- Harhoff, Dietmar & Stoll, Sebastian, 2015. "Exploring the Opaqueness of the Patent System - Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 496, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri, 2022.
"Technology Protectionism and the Patent System: Evidence from China,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 1-43, March.
- Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Emilio Raiteri, 2020. "Technology protectionism and the patent system: Evidence from China," Working Papers 11, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
- Zhang, Gupeng & Xiong, Libin & Duan, Hongbo & Huang, Dujuan, 2020. "Obtaining certainty vs. creating uncertainty: Does firms’ patent filing strategy work as expected?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
- Chung, Jiyoon & Lorenz, Annika & Somaya, Deepak, 2019. "Dealing with intellectual property (IP) landmines: Defensive measures to address the problem of IP access," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
- Mark Schankerman & Florian Schuett, 2022.
"Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare,"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 2101-2148.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Other publications TiSEM 71ffc853-44e7-4117-ac82-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Other publications TiSEM 9e661f68-5210-4ca7-8b2f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2022. "Patent screening, innovation, and welfare," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," CEPR Discussion Papers 15301, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Discussion Paper 2020-024, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Schankerman, Mark & Schuett, Florian, 2020. "Patent Screening, Innovation, and Welfare," Discussion Paper 2020-024, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
- David Encaoua & Yassine Lefouili, 2009.
"Licensing ‘Weak’ Patents,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 492-525, September.
- David Encaoua & Yassine Lefouili, 2009. "Licensing weak patents," Post-Print halshs-00415747, HAL.
- ENCAOUA, David & LEFOUILI, Yassine, 2009. "Licensing 'weak' patents," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2159, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- David Encaoua & Yassine Lefouili, 2009. "Licensing weak patents," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00415747, HAL.
- David Encaoua & Yassine Lefouili, 2009. "Licensing weak patents," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00415747, HAL.
- Liegsalz, Johannes & Wagner, Stefan, 2013.
"Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 552-563.
- Johannes Liegsalz & Stefan Wagner, 2011. "Patent examination at the State Intellectual Property Office in China," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-11-06, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
- Graham, Stuart J.H. & Harhoff, Dietmar, 2006.
"Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of US and European Patents,"
Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems
38, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Harhoff, Dietmar & Graham, Stuart J.H., 2006. "Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of US and European Patents," CEPR Discussion Papers 5680, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Li Yao & He Ni, 2023. "Prediction of patent grant and interpreting the key determinants: an application of interpretable machine learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 4933-4969, September.
- Lei, Zhen & Wright, Brian D., 2009. "Why weak patents? Rational ignorance or pro-"customer" Tilt?," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49279, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
- Farasat A. S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Arnold Polanski, 2020.
"Entry limiting agreements: First‐mover advantage, authorized generics, and pay‐for‐delay deals,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 516-542, July.
- Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Arnold Polanski, 2020. "Entry limiting agreements: First mover advantage, authorized generics and pay-for-delay deals," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2015-05v4, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Alfons Palangkaraya & Paul H. Jensen & Elizabeth Webster, 2005. "Determinants of International Patent Examination Outcomes," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2005n06, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- Seppälä, Timo & Kenney, Martin, 2012. "Competitive Dynamics, IP Litigation and Acquisitions - The Struggle for Positional Advantage in the Emerging Mobile Internet," Discussion Papers 1288, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Dietmar Harhoff & Georg von Graevenitz & Stefan Wagner, 2016.
"Conflict Resolution, Public Goods, and Patent Thickets,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 704-721, March.
- Dietmar Harhoff & Georg von Graevenitz & Stefan Wagner, 2012. "Conflict resolution, public goods and patent thickets," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-12-04 (R1), ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 25 Mar 2013.
- Dietmar Harhoff & Georg von Graevenitz & Stefan Wagner, 2013. "Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2013-04, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Dietmar Harhoff & Georg von Graevenitz & Stefan Wagner, 2014. "Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets," Working Papers 49, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
- Harhoff, Dietmar & von Graevenitz, Georg & Wagner, Stefan, 2013. "Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets," CEPR Discussion Papers 9468, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2018.
"Are patent fees effective at weeding out low‐quality patents?,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 134-148, March.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2014. "Are Patent Fees Effective at Weeding out Low-quality Patents?," NBER Working Papers 20785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2015. "Are Patent Fees Effective at Weeding Out Low-Quality Patents?," Motu Working Papers 15_01, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
- Useche, Diego, 2014.
"Are patents signals for the IPO market? An EU–US comparison for the software industry,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1299-1311.
- Diego Useche, 2014. "Are patents signals for the IPO market? An EU–US comparison for the software industry," Post-Print hal-01135634, HAL.
More about this item
Keywords
; ; ; ; ;JEL classification:
- O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
- K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
- F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-INO-2020-09-21 (Innovation)
- NEP-IPR-2020-09-21 (Intellectual Property Rights)
- NEP-LAW-2020-09-21 (Law and Economics)
- NEP-TID-2020-09-21 (Technology and Industrial Dynamics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iip:wpaper:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gaétan de Rassenfosse (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stip.epfl.ch/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iip/wpaper/12.html