IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/idb/wpaper/3038.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La autonomía de los entes reguladores argentinos: Agua y cloacas, gas natural, energía eléctrica y telecomunicaciones

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Urbiztondo
  • Fernando Navajas
  • Daniel Artana

Abstract

Este trabajo presenta un análisis de las relaciones entre el diseño de los Entes Reguladores, el contexto económico en el cual éstos actúan, y la existencia o no de algún tipo de sesgo en sus decisiones. Con ese fin, se examina la ocurrencia o no de distintos factores que se han identificado en el paradigma "principal-agente" tal como éste se aplica a las instituciones políticas en la nueva teoría positiva de la regulación, en cinco casos concretos de la experiencia argentina reciente: los Entes Reguladores de Agua y Cloacas de Buenos Aires, de Transmisión y Distribución de Gas Natural y Energía Eléctrica, y de Telecomunicaciones. Entre los aspectos de diseño, por ejemplo, se considera la composición, estabilidad, financiamiento, supervisión y atribuciones de los Entes, mientras que en lo referido al contexto se analiza el número de empresas reguladas, el grado de competencia entre éstas, la visibilidad de las decisiones del regulador, etc. El número de decisiones regulatorias considerado es relativamente escaso, razón por la cual los resultados obtenidos sólo deben considerarse como preliminares. Las conclusiones que se obtienen de este estudio son que en aquellos casos donde tanto el diseño como el contexto actúan en el mismo sentido, generando el mismo tipo de hipótesis sobre la tendencia en el accionar del regulador, la evidencia observada no contradice lo esperado, y muy por el contrario, tiende a confirmar las hipótesis postuladas. Esto ocurre en los casos de Energía Eléctrica, Gas Natural y Agua y Saneamiento: en los dos primeros, sus decisiones aparecen insesgadas o levemente "oportunistas", mientras que en el último ocurre lo contrario. En el caso de telecomunicaciones, ciertos aspectos del contexto tienden a acentuar los factores de diseño institucional, pero otros elementos del ambiente regulatorio actúan en sentido inverso, con lo cual la predicción teórica es indefinida, aunque en forma previsible en este caso, las decisiones son tomadas en niveles superiores del gobierno. English: The paper looks at the design and context of operation of newly created, formally autonomous, regulatory agencies in different sectors at the federal level in Argentina (including water and sewarage in Buenos Aires, natural gas, electric power and telecommunications). It tries to predict what kind of incentives should be expected of those agencies (i. e. , a more concentrated industry should be expected to be able to better coordinate "transfers" and disclosure of information to the regulator and thus, ceteris paribus, this would imply a consistent bias to favor the industry in the regulator`s use of the discretion enjoyed in interpreting facts to justify decisions, etc. ). The implicit model behind our theory is one of an agent responding to various principals with conflicting objetives, where the principals are less informed than the agent but offer "transfers" linked to results to help the agents internalize their objectives. We then look at actual decisions taken by those agencies (the sample is small, but to our knowledge, unbiased) to see if those expected biases do happen. We conclude preliminarily that they do happen, and thus that design and context of operation of regulatory agencies, all of them sharing the same institutional foundations of the same country at the same historic period, are important for agency behavior (which should be expected, but we do not confirm, impacts upon the regulated firms´ behavior in terms of investment, disclousure of information, cost minimization, etc. ).

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Urbiztondo & Fernando Navajas & Daniel Artana, 1998. "La autonomía de los entes reguladores argentinos: Agua y cloacas, gas natural, energía eléctrica y telecomunicaciones," Research Department Publications 3038, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:3038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iadb.org/research/pub_hits.cfm?pub_id=R-340&pub_file_name=pubR-340.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    2. Hopenhayn, Hugo & Lohmann, Susanne, 1996. "Fire-Alarm Signals and the Political Oversight of Regulatory Agencies," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 196-213, April.
    3. Levy, Brian & Spiller, Pablo T, 1994. "The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 201-246, October.
    4. Pablo T. Spiller & Ingo Vogelsang, 1997. "The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment in the UK: The Case of Telecommunications," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 153(4), pages 607-607, December.
    5. de Figueiredo, Rui J P, Jr & Spiller, Pablo T & Urbiztondo, Santiago, 1999. "An Informational Perspective on Administrative Procedures," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 283-305, April.
    6. Noll, Roger G., 1989. "Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 22, pages 1253-1287, Elsevier.
    7. Joskow, Paul L, 1974. "Inflation and Environmental Concern: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Price Regulation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(2), pages 291-327, October.
    8. Spiller, Pablo T, 1990. "Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulators: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or "Let Them Be Bribed."," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(1), pages 65-101, April.
    9. Spiller, Pablo T. & Urbiztondo, Santiago, 1994. "Political appointees vs. career civil servants: A multiple principals theory of political bureaucracies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 465-497, October.
    10. Sutherland, Ronald J., 1993. "Natural gas contracts in an emerging competitive market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(12), pages 1191-1204, December.
    11. Epstein, David & O'Halloran, Sharyn, 1995. "A Theory of Strategic Oversight: Congress, Lobbyists, and the Bureaucracy," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 227-255, October.
    12. Lupia, Arthur & McCubbins, Mathew D, 1994. "Learning from Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 96-125, April.
    13. McCubbins, Mathew D & Noll, Roger G & Weingast, Barry R, 1987. "Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 243-277, Fall.
    14. Daniel Artana, Ricardo López Murphy, Fernando Navajas, Santiago Urbiztondo, 1995. "El Relabanceo de las Tarifas Telefónica en la Arentina," Working Papers 48, FIEL.
    15. Potters, Jan & van Winden, Frans, 1992. "Lobbying and Asymmetric Information," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 269-292, October.
    16. Gary S. Becker, 1983. "A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel A. Abdala, 2001. "Institutions, Contracts and Regulation of Infrastructure in Argentina," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 217-254, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariano Tommasi & Pablo T. Spiller, 2004. "The Institutions of Regulation," Working Papers 67, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Mar 2004.
    2. Moszoro, Marian W. & Spiller, Pablo T., 2014. "Third-Party Opportunism and the Theory of Public Contracts: Operationalization and Applications," MPRA Paper 101592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. John M. de Figueiredo, 2009. "Integrated Political Strategy," NBER Working Papers 15053, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2004. "Astroturf: Interest Group Lobbying and Corporate Strategy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 561-597, December.
    5. Spiller, Pablo T., 2013. "Transaction cost regulation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 232-242.
    6. Peter Grajzl, 2011. "A property rights approach to legislative delegation," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 177-200, June.
    7. Guy Holburn & Richard Bergh, 2006. "Consumer capture of regulatory institutions: The creation of public utility consumer advocates in the United States," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 45-73, January.
    8. Swank Otto H., 2000. "Seeking information: the role of information providers in the policy decision process," Public Economics 0004004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. P. Hägg, 1997. "Theories on the Economics of Regulation: A Survey of the Literature from a European Perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 337-370, December.
    10. Larry Blank & John Mayo, 2009. "Endogenous Regulatory Constraints and the Emergence of Hybrid Regulation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 35(3), pages 233-255, November.
    11. Moser, Peter, 1999. "The impact of legislative institutions on public policy: a survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-33, March.
    12. Pablo T. Spiller & Sanny Liao, 2006. "Buy, Lobby or Sue: Interest Groups' Participation in Policy Making - A Selective Survey," NBER Working Papers 12209, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2010. "What Anti-Corruption Policy Can Learn from Theories of Sector Regulation," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2010-033, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. John M. de Figueiredo & Edward H. Stiglitz, 2015. "Democratic Rulemaking," NBER Working Papers 21765, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Joskow, Paul L. & Rose, Nancy L. & Shepard, Andrea., 1993. "Regulatory constraints on executive compensation," Working papers 3550-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    16. Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2011. "Anti-Corruption Policy in Theories of Sector Regulation," Chapters, in: Susan Rose-Ackerman & Tina Søreide (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2017. "Independent Agencies, Political Interference, And Firm Investment: Evidence From The European Union," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 281-304, January.
    18. Fremeth, Adam R. & Holburn, Guy L. F. & Piazza, Alessandro, 2021. "Activist Protest Spillovers into the Regulatory Domain: Theory and Evidence from the U.S. Nuclear Power Generation Industry," OSF Preprints s39h2, Center for Open Science.
    19. Paul Joskow & Nancy Rose & Andrea Shepard, 1993. "Regulatory Constraints on CEO Compensation," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 24(1 Microec), pages 1-72.
    20. Jean‐Michel Glachant, 2008. "La Deregulation Des Industries De Reseaux Comme Politique Institutionnelle De Creation De Marches Et De Mecanismes De Gouvernance," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3‐4), pages 487-525, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:3038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.