IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/luwick/2019_001.html

Systemic Risk and Centrality Revisited:The Role of Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Asgharian, Hossein

    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

  • Krygier, Dominika

    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

  • Vilhelmsson, Anders

    (Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University)

Abstract

We suggest that banks contribute extensively to systemic risk only if they are both “risky” and centrally placed in the financial network. To calculate systemic risk we apply the ∆CoVaR measure of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) and measure centrality using detailed US loan syndication data. In agreement with our conjecture our main finding is that centrality is an important determinant of systemic risk but primarily not by its direct effect. Rather, its main influence is to make other firm specific risk measures more important for highly connected banks. A bank’s contribution to systemic risk from a fixed level of Value-at-Risk is about four times higher for a bank with two standard deviations above average centrality compared to a bank with average network centrality. Neglecting this indirect moderation effect of centrality severely underestimates the importance of centrality for “risky” banks and overestimates the effect for “safer” banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Asgharian, Hossein & Krygier, Dominika & Vilhelmsson, Anders, 2019. "Systemic Risk and Centrality Revisited:The Role of Interactions," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2019/1, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:luwick:2019_001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lusem.lu.se/media/kwc/working-papers/2019/KWCwp2019-1.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:luwick:2019_001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jens Forssbaeck or Frederik Lundtofte The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Frederik Lundtofte to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kwcluse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.