IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lunewp/2025_003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Truth-Telling in a Priority Pricing Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Thami, Prakriti

    (Department of Economics, Lund University)

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of truth-telling preferences on aggregate consumer welfare within a priority pricing (PP) mechanism. Traditional models assume individuals always misrepresent private information to maximize payoffs, yet recent evidence suggests there may be an innate preference for truth-telling. By incorporating these preferences into a theoretical framework, I show that PP enhances welfare over uniform pricing only when the probability of non-truthful individuals surpasses a critical threshold, suggesting that PP may benefit populations with low truth-telling tendencies but reduce welfare when this tendency is high. To empirically test this, I conducted an online experiment, finding that while PP incentivized truth-telling, its impact did not vary significantly across groups with differing truth-telling tendencies. Instead, participants’ beliefs about others' truthfulness emerged as key in shaping behavior. These findings underscore that PP’s welfare-enhancing potential depends not only on incentives created by the pricing structure but also on the population's truth-telling tendencies and beliefs, offering valuable insight for designing effective pricing mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Thami, Prakriti, 2025. "Truth-Telling in a Priority Pricing Mechanism," Working Papers 2025:3, Lund University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2025_003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/212192295/WP25_3
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yina Lu & Andrés Musalem & Marcelo Olivares & Ariel Schilkrut, 2013. "Measuring the Effect of Queues on Customer Purchases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1743-1763, August.
    2. Conte, Anna & Scarsini, Marco & Sürücü, Oktay, 2016. "The impact of time limitation: Insights from a queueing experiment," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 260-274, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan W. Buell, 2017. "Last Place Aversion in Queues," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-053, Harvard Business School, revised Oct 2019.
    2. Mirko Kremer & Laurens Debo, 2016. "Inferring Quality from Wait Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 3023-3038, October.
    3. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2017. "How Do Delay Announcements Shape Customer Behavior? An Empirical Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Liang, Jian & Zhao, Ya & Wang, Hai & Xiao, Zuopeng & Ke, Jintao, 2024. "Uncovering merchants’ willingness to wait in on-demand food delivery markets," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 14-28.
    5. Erjie Ang & Sara Kwasnick & Mohsen Bayati & Erica L. Plambeck & Michael Aratow, 2016. "Accurate Emergency Department Wait Time Prediction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 141-156, February.
    6. Eyster, Erik & Galeotti, Andrea & Kartik, Navin & Rabin, Matthew, 2014. "Congested observational learning," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 519-538.
    7. Smirnov, Dmitry & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2020. "Analytics for labor planning in systems with load-dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 668-681.
    8. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    9. Aditya Jain & Sanjog Misra & Nils Rudi, 2020. "The Effect of Sales Assistance on Purchase Decisions: An analysis using retail video data," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 273-303, September.
    10. Christian Terwiesch & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats & Vishal Gaur, 2020. "OM Forum—A Review of Empirical Operations Management over the Last Two Decades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 656-668, July.
    11. Eugene Furman & Adam Diamant & Murat Kristal, 2021. "Customer Acquisition and Retention: A Fluid Approach for Staffing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4236-4257, November.
    12. Pascucci, Federica & Nardi, Lorenzo & Marinelli, Luca & Paolanti, Marina & Frontoni, Emanuele & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Combining sell-out data with shopper behaviour data for category performance measurement: The role of category conversion power," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Brett Alan Hathaway & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Vinayak Deshpande, 2022. "Personalized Priority Policies in Call Centers Using Past Customer Interaction Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2806-2823, April.
    14. Zeynep Akşin & Baris Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2017. "Impact of Delay Announcements in Call Centers: An Empirical Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 242-265, February.
    15. Chun (Martin) Qiu & Wenqing Zhang, 2016. "Managing long queues for holiday sales shopping," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 52-65, February.
    16. van de Klundert, Joris & Cominetti, Roberto & Liu, Yun & Kong, Qingxia, 2024. "The interdependence between hospital choice and waiting time — with a case study in urban China," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Kaan Kuzu & Long Gao & Susan H. Xu, 2019. "To Wait or Not to Wait: The Theory and Practice of Ticket Queues," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 853-874, October.
    18. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen, 2018. "Service Differentiation and Operating Segments: A Framework and an Application to After-Sales Services," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 440-454, July.
    19. Qiuping Yu & Yiming Zhang & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2022. "Delay Information in Virtual Queues: A Large-Scale Field Experiment on a Major Ride-Sharing Platform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5745-5757, August.
    20. Marshall Fisher & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Why Empirical Research Is Good for Operations Management, and What Is Good Empirical Operations Management?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-178, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    priority pricing; consumer welfare; truth-telling behavior; incentive-compatible pricing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2025_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iker Arregui Alegria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/delunse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.