IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Inclusion of Non-cash Housing Advantages in the Income Concept. Estimates and Distribution Effects for Belgium

Listed author(s):
  • Gerlinde Verbist
  • Stijn Lefebure
Registered author(s):

    As pointed out by the Expert Group on Household Income Statistics (Canberra Group, 2001), the way in which is dealt with the income value of home ownership is crucial for distribution analyses. Home-ownership can have a large impact on a household’s expenditure structure. Because of the large proportion of home-owners in Belgium, a serious attempt to estimate the economic well-being of households should take the non-cash advantage derived of home-ownership, the so-called ‘imputed rent’ into account. Also tenants who benefit from below-market rent or rent-free accommodation can be considered as beneficiaries of imputed rent. In this paper we explore different techniques to estimate imputed rent for Belgium, based on the methodology presented by Frick & Grabka (2003). We apply two methods for estimating imputed rent, namely 1) the selfassessment approach, and 2) the opportunity cost approach. Calculations are performed on the micro-data of the Belgian EU-SILC of the survey year 2004 (with income data referring to 2003). These estimates allow us to assess the distribution effect of including imputed rent in the income.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp in its series Working Papers with number 0801.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Nov 2008
    Handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:0801
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Pietro Catte & Nathalie Girouard & Robert W. R. Price & Christophe André, 2004. "Housing Markets, Wealth and the Business Cycle," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 394, OECD Publishing.
    2. Thaler, Richard, 1980. "Toward a positive theory of consumer choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 39-60, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdl:wpaper:0801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wim Van Lancker)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.