In-work poverty in times of crisis: do part-timers fare worse?
Part-time work has structurally increased across Europe. The recent crisis period has brought additional increases in many countries, especially in involuntary part-time employment. This paper considers the link between part-time work and poverty, taking a comparative perspective across the EU15. The extent to which part-time work is associated with poverty varies considerably, far more so than for full-time workers. Involuntary part-time work clearly stands out as most problematic although an increased poverty risk is not confined to that segment of part-time work. Part-time work for care reasons also carries a higher poverty risk in some countries. It is most problematic in countries where demand and supply side related factors reinforce each other so as to make part-time work an inferior choice from the perspective of preferred working hours, earnings and employment security. Moreover, part-timers sometimes face a ‘double income penalty’ in that they are more likely to have lower earnings and reduced eligibility for certain social transfers. However, there is again considerable cross-country variation in this respect. In some countries actually the reverse is the case and part-timers are in effect more likely to receive social transfers, while being in employment, improving their post-transfer poverty position in a significant way. Taken together, the paper shows that the regulatory drivers shaping part-time work and the welfare state arrangements supporting, or failing to support part-time work play key roles in accounting for the wide variation in poverty risks associated with part-time work across the EU15.
|Date of creation:||Aug 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://improve-research.eu|
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Alison Booth & Jan Ours, 2013.
"Part-time jobs: what women want?,"
Journal of Population Economics,
Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 263-283, January.
- Booth, Alison L & van Ours, Jan C, 2010. "Part-Time Jobs: What Women Want?," CEPR Discussion Papers 7627, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Booth, A.L. & van Ours, J.C., 2010. "Part-time Jobs : What Women Want?," Discussion Paper 2010-05, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Booth, Alison L. & van Ours, Jan C., 2010. "Part-Time Jobs: What Women Want?," IZA Discussion Papers 4686, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Janine Leschke, 2007. "Are unemployment insurance systems in Europe adapting to new risks arising from non-standard employment?," DULBEA Working Papers 07-05.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Jérôme De Henau & Danièle Meulders & Sile Padraigin O'Dorchai, 2007. "Support for market care: comparing child cash and tax benefits," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9299, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Petrongolo, Barbara, 2004.
"Gender Segregation in Employment Contracts,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
4303, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Henning Lohmann, 2008. "Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 776, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Eichhorst, Werner & Hemerijck, Anton, 2008. "Welfare and Employment: A European Dilemma?," IZA Discussion Papers 3870, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Piet Allaart & Lutz Bellmann, 2007. "Reasons for part-time work: an empirical analysis for Germany and The Netherlands," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(7), pages 557-570, November.
- Annette Walling & Gareth Clancy, 2010. "Underemployment in the UK labour market," Economic and Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 16-24, February.
- Buddelmeyer, Hielke & Mourre, Gilles & Ward-Warmedinger, Melanie E., 2004. "The Determinants of Part-Time Work in EU Countries: Empirical Investigations with Macro-Panel Data," IZA Discussion Papers 1361, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Joris Ghysels & Wim Van Lancker, 2010. "The unequal benefits of family activation: an analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children," Working Papers 1008, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hdl:improv:1314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tim Goedemé)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.