IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01183005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Basso

    (LSE - London School of Economics and Political Science)

  • Philippe Robert-Demontrond

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Maryvonne Hayek
  • Jean-Luc Anton

    (Centre d'IRM Fonctionnelle Cérébrale - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM])

  • Bruno Nazarian

    (SCC - Sciences du cerveau et de la cognition - Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille 2 - Université de Provence - Aix-Marseille 1 - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Muriel Roth

    (TU Darmstadt - Technische Universität Darmstadt - Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Olivier Oullier

    (LPC - Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

A Food Imitating Product (FIP) is a household cleaner or a personal care product that exhibits food attributes in order to enrich consumption experience. As revealed by many cases worldwide, such a marketing strategy led to unintentional self-poisonings and deaths. FIPs therefore constitute a very serious health and public policy issue. To understand why FIPs are a threat, we first conducted a qualitative analysis on real-life cases of household cleaners and personal care products-related phone calls at a poison control center followed by a behavioral experiment. Unintentional self-poisoning in the home following the accidental ingestion of a hygiene product by a healthy adult is very likely to result from these products being packaged like foodstuffs. Our hypothesis is that FIPs are non-verbal food metaphors that could fool the brain of consumers. We therefore conducted a subsequent functional neuroimaging (fMRI) experiment that revealed how visual processing of FIPs leads to cortical taste inferences. Considered in the grounded cognition perspective, the results of our studies reveal that healthy adults can unintentionally categorize a personal care product as something edible when a food-like package is employed to market nonedible and/or dangerous products. Our methodology combining field (qualitative) and laboratory (behavioral and functional neuroimaging) findings could be of particular relevance for policy makers, as it can help screening products prior to their market release – e.g. the way they are packaged and how they can potentially confuse the mind of consumers – and therefore save lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Basso & Philippe Robert-Demontrond & Maryvonne Hayek & Jean-Luc Anton & Bruno Nazarian & Muriel Roth & Olivier Oullier, 2014. "Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes," Post-Print halshs-01183005, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01183005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100368
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01183005v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01183005v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0100368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moreau, C Page & Markman, Arthur B & Lehmann, Donald R, 2001. ""What Is It?" Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(4), pages 489-498, March.
    2. Olivier Oullier, 2013. "Behavioural insights are vital to policy-making," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7468), pages 463-463, September.
    3. Holbrook, Morris B, et al, 1984. "Play as a Consumption Experience: The Roles of Emotions, Performance, and Personality in the Enjoyment of Games," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(2), pages 728-739, September.
    4. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    5. Olivier Oullier, 2012. "Clear up this fuzzy thinking on brain scans," Nature, Nature, vol. 483(7387), pages 7-7, March.
    6. Frédéric Basso & Olivier Oullier, 2011. "Smokers Are Suckers: Should Incongruous Metaphors Be Used in Public Health Prevention?," Post-Print halshs-00601463, HAL.
    7. Rees, Charlotte E. & Knight, Lynn V. & Wilkinson, Clare E., 2007. "Doctors being up there and we being down here: A metaphorical analysis of talk about student/doctor-patient relationships," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 725-737, August.
    8. Basso, F. & Oullier, O., 2011. "Smokers are suckers: Should incongruous metaphors be used in public health prevention?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(2), pages 203-204.
    9. Coveney, Catherine M. & Nerlich, Brigitte & Martin, Paul, 2009. "Modafinil in the media: Metaphors, medicalisation and the body," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 487-495, February.
    10. Wallis, Patrick & Nerlich, Brigitte, 2005. "Disease metaphors in new epidemics: the UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 2629-2639, June.
    11. Kopjar, B. & Wickizer, T.M., 1996. "Home injuries among adults in Stavanger, Norway," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(3), pages 400-404.
    12. Carolyn Yoon & Angela H. Gutchess & Fred Feinberg & Thad A. Polk, 2006. "A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 31-40, June.
    13. Schneider, Kenneth C, 1977. "Prevention of Accidental Poisoning through Package and Label Design," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(2), pages 67-74, Se.
    14. Priyali Rajagopal & Robert E. Burnkrant, 2009. "Consumer Evaluations of Hybrid Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 232-241.
    15. Joy, Annamma & Sherry, John F, Jr, 2003. "Speaking of Art as Embodied Imagination: A Multisensory Approach to Understanding Aesthetic Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 259-282, September.
    16. Joy, Annamma & Sherry Jr., John F. & Deschenes, Jonathan, 2009. "Conceptual blending in advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.
    17. Krieger, N., 2008. "Proximal, distal, and the politics of causation: What's level got to do with it?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 221-230.
    18. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    19. Thompson, Craig J & Pollio, Howard R & Locander, William B, 1994. "The Spoken and the Unspoken: A Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding the Cultural Viewpoints That Underlie Consumers' Expressed Meanings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 432-452, December.
    20. MacInnis, Deborah J & Price, Linda L, 1987. "The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 473-491, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan H. Murphy, 2019. "The rationality of literal Tide Pod consumption," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 111-122, July.
    2. Frédéric Basso & Julien Bouillé & Kevin Le Goff & Philippe Robert-Demontrond & Olivier Oullier, 2016. "Assessing the Role of Shape and Label in the Misleading Packaging of Food Imitating Products: From Empirical Evidence to Policy Recommendation," Post-Print halshs-01306951, HAL.
    3. Rita Saleh & Angela Bearth & Michael Siegrist, 2019. "“Chemophobia” Today: Consumers’ Knowledge and Perceptions of Chemicals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2668-2682, December.
    4. Angela Bearth & Linda Miesler & Michael Siegrist, 2017. "Consumers’ Risk Perception of Household Cleaning and Washing Products," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 647-660, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basso, Frédéric & Robert-Demontrond, Philippe & Hayek, Maryvonne & Anton, Jean-Luc & Nazarian, Bruno & Roth, Muriel & Oullier, Olivier, 2014. "Why people drink shampoo? Food imitating products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Frédéric Basso & Julien Bouillé & Kevin Le Goff & Philippe Robert-Demontrond & Olivier Oullier, 2016. "Assessing the Role of Shape and Label in the Misleading Packaging of Food Imitating Products: From Empirical Evidence to Policy Recommendation," Post-Print halshs-01306951, HAL.
    3. Delbaere, Marjorie, 2013. "Metaphors and myths in pharmaceutical advertising," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 21-29.
    4. Boyaval, Marine & Herbert, Maud, 2018. "One for all and all for one? The bliss and torment in communal entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 412-422.
    5. von Wallpach, Sylvia & Hemetsberger, Andrea & Thomsen, Thyra Uth & Belk, Russel W., 2020. "Moments of luxury – A qualitative account of the experiential essence of luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 491-502.
    6. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    7. Liu, Chihling & Keeling, Debbie Isobel & Hogg, Margaret K., 2016. "Strategy narratives and wellbeing challenges: The role of everyday self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 234-243.
    8. Joy, Annamma & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng & Chan, Tsang-Sing & Sherry, John F. & Cui, Geng, 2014. "M(Art)Worlds: Consumer Perceptions of How Luxury Brand Stores Become Art Institutions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 347-364.
    9. Tobias Effertz & Marie-Kristin Franke & Thorsten Teichert, 2014. "Adolescents’ Assessments of Advertisements for Unhealthy Food: an Example of Warning Labels for Soft Drinks," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 279-299, June.
    10. Hollenbeck, Candice R. & Peters, Cara & Zinkhan, George M., 2008. "Retail Spectacles and Brand Meaning: Insights from a Brand Museum Case Study," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 334-353.
    11. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    12. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-50.
    13. George Rossolatos, 2021. "So near, so far, so what is social distancing? A fundamental ontological account of a mobile place brand," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 397-407, December.
    14. Monica Fait & Antonio Iazzi & Paola Scorrano, 2014. "La brand experience nelle strategie commerciali delle imprese vitivinicole," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 285-304.
    15. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mishra, Hari Govind & Kaul, Surabhi, 2014. "Dominance of Affective over Cognitive Customer Satisfaction in Satisfaction-Loyalty Relationship in Service Encounters," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-15, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    16. Federica Codignola & Paolo Mariani, 2022. "Investigating preferences in art collecting: the case of the François Pinault Collection," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 107-133, March.
    17. Elliot, Esi A., 2016. "Craft consumption and consumer transformation in a transmodern era," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 18-24.
    18. Liu, Martin J. & Yannopoulou, Natalia & Bian, Xuemei & Elliott, Richard, 2015. "Authenticity Perceptions in the Chinese Marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-33.
    19. Lin, Hsin-Hui & Tseng, Timmy H. & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen & Wang, Yi-Shun, 2020. "What drives customers’ post-purchase price search intention in the context of online price matching guarantees," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Naletelich, Kelly & Paswan, Audhesh K., 2018. "Art infusion in retailing: The effect of art genres," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 514-522.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01183005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.