IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00176546.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contextual appraisal of GM cotton diffusion in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Fok

    () (Systèmes cotonniers - Systèmes cotonniers en petit paysannat - CIRAD - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Marnus Gouse

    () (Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development - University of Pretoria [South Africa])

  • Jean-Luc Hofs

    () (Systèmes cotonniers - Systèmes cotonniers en petit paysannat - CIRAD - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Johann Kirsten

    () (Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development - University of Pretoria [South Africa])

Abstract

The bulk of the South African cotton crop is produced by large scale commercial farmers. Therefore it might be misleading to present South Africa's impressive Genetically Modified Cotton (GMC) adoption figures as evidence of successful GMC use by smallholder farmers. The South African cotton sector struggles in an unstable production and market environment and smallholders with limited resources and limited production, managerial and marketing capacity and choice suffer most. The total South African cotton area and number of farmers decreased drastically since the introduction of GMC and this causes observers to question the so-called success story of GMC in South Africa. The South African smallholder experience has shown that technology introduction on its own cannot sustainably increase production; factors like institutional arrangements plays a vital role. Studies have in the past focussed exclusively on the performance of the new technology and the institutional role has been under emphasised. The results of our research complement the existing studies by pointing out low profitability in an unfavourable climatic and institutional context. This reminds us that rain-fed agriculture remains sensitive to climatic hazards and that new technology adoption under these conditions might increase financial risk associated with cotton production.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Fok & Marnus Gouse & Jean-Luc Hofs & Johann Kirsten, 2007. "Contextual appraisal of GM cotton diffusion in South Africa," Post-Print halshs-00176546, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00176546
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00176546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00176546/document
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matin Qaim & Alain de Janvry, 2003. "Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers' Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 814-828.
    2. Beyers, L. & Ismael, Y. & Piesse, J. & Thirtle, C.G., 2002. "Can Gm-Technologies Help The Poor? The Efficiency Of Bt Cotton Adopters In The Makhathini Flats Of Kwazulu-Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(1), March.
    3. Gouse, Marnus & Kirsten, Johann F. & Jenkins, Lindie, 2002. "Bt Cotton In South Africa: Adoption And The Impact On Farm Incomes Amongst Small-Scale And Large Scale Farmers," Working Papers 18022, University of Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development.
    4. William D. McBride & Nora Books, 2000. "Survey evidence on producer use and costs of genetically modified seed," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 6-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gouse, Marnus, 2013. "Socioeconomic and farm-level effects of genetically modified crops: The case of Bt crops in South Africa," IFPRI book chapters,in: Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Gruère, Guillaume P. & Sithole-Niang, Idah (ed.), Genetically modified crops in Africa: Economic and policy lessons from countries south of the Sahara, chapter 1, pages 25-41 International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cotton; South Africa; GMO; impact evaluation; profitability; coton; Afrique du Sud; OGM; Bt; évaluation d'impact; rentabilité;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00176546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.