IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05571516.html

Economic Development as a Concept: Fissiparity Rather than Teleology? Introduction

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Nicole Sindzingre

    (ACT - Analyse des Crises et Transitions - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, LAM - Les Afriques dans le monde - IEP Bordeaux - Sciences Po Bordeaux - Institut d'études politiques de Bordeaux - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Bordeaux - UBM - Université Bordeaux Montaigne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The word 'development' inherently conveys teleological connotations -a progression from an 'unachieved' state of affairs towards a desirable one ('being developed'). It is argued that, paradoxically, this concept, its meanings (its epistemology), and its uses (in empirical reality) do not display an evolutionary path where phenomena converge towards a dynamic ('development'), or where its successive paradigms exhibit path-dependency (an improved adequation to reality). Instead, the concept is subject to fissiparity and dilution as it is used by numerous disciplines, and as it has been shaped more by 'external' geopolitical events than by reflections on its epistemological validity, and by institutions that do not prioritise the advancement of knowledge. Furthermore, the object of economic 'development' has dissolved, with groups of countries fluctuating over time. the concept hence exhibits fissiparous dynamics more than teleological connotations and is not driven by the quest for an improved fit of its meanings to reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Nicole Sindzingre, 2025. "Economic Development as a Concept: Fissiparity Rather than Teleology? Introduction," Post-Print hal-05571516, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05571516
    DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2025.2595258
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05571516v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05571516v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07360932.2025.2595258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. P. Thirlwall, 2015. "Kaldor as a Policy Adviser," Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Essays on Keynesian and Kaldorian Economics, chapter 10, pages 244-270, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Dani Rodrik, 1995. "Trade Strategy, Investment, and Exports: Another Look at East Asia," NBER Working Papers 5339, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Paul M. Romer, 2015. "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 89-93, May.
    4. Alexandre Truc & Olivier Santerre & Yves Gingras & François Claveau, 2023. "The interdisciplinarity of economics," Post-Print hal-04719259, HAL.
    5. Davide Gualerzi, 2012. "Development Economics: A Theoretical and Historical Perspective," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 6(1), pages 27-48.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/67ft27s7u58ocangahl1jigu6p is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "La superioridad de los economistas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 17(33), pages 13-43, July-Dece.
    8. Ben Fine, 2009. "Development as Zombieconomics in the Age of Neoliberalism," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 885-904.
    9. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 89-114, Winter.
    10. repec:nos:voprec:y:2015:id:94 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Toye, John, 1989. "Nicholas Kaldor and Tax Reform in Developing Countries," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 183-200, March.
    12. Dreher, Axel & Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Vreeland, James Raymond, 2009. "Development aid and international politics: Does membership on the UN Security Council influence World Bank decisions?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Erik Thorbecke, 2006. "The Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950-2005," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-155, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Easterly, William & Williamson, Claudia R., 2011. "Rhetoric versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1930-1949.
    15. Srinivasan, T N, 1994. "Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 238-243, May.
    16. Tommy Chrimes & Bram Gootjes & M. Ayhan Kose & Collette Wheeler, 2024. "The Great Reversal," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 41403, April.
    17. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 427-460, July.
    18. Robert H. Wade, 2022. "The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 204-209, January.
    19. Lynda Pickbourn & Léonce Ndikumana, 2019. "Does Health Aid Reduce Infant and Child Mortality from Diarrhoea in Sub-Saharan Africa?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2212-2231, October.
    20. Jason Hickel & Giorgos Kallis & Tim Jackson & Daniel W. O’Neill & Juliet B. Schor & Julia K. Steinberger & Peter A. Victor & Diana Ürge-Vorsatz, 2022. "Degrowth can work — here’s how science can help," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7940), pages 400-403, December.
    21. M. Fourcade & E. Ollion & Y. Algan., 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 7.
    22. Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira & José Luis Oreiro, 2024. "Brevíssima história da teoria do desenvolvimento. De Schumpeter e Prebisch ao novo desenvolvimentismo," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, FGV EAESP, vol. 44(1), pages 5-28, December.
    23. Ravi Kanbur, 2025. "Is There A Development Economics Anymore?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(2), pages 391-397, April.
    24. Djalita Fialho & Peter A. G. Van Bergeijk, 2017. "The Proliferation of Developing Country Classifications," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 99-115, January.
    25. Anna Bruederle & Roland Hodler, 2018. "Nighttime lights as a proxy for human development at the local level," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, September.
    26. Axel Dreher & Vera Z Eichenauer & Kai Gehring, 2018. "Geopolitics, Aid, and Growth: The Impact of UN Security Council Membership on the Effectiveness of Aid," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 268-286.
    27. Andy Sumner, 2024. "Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1280-1298, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Baccini & Lucio Barabesi & Carlo Debernardi, 2025. "Exploring the Shape of Economics: A Multilayer Network Analysis of Social Communities and Intellectual Similarity Among Journals Before and After the 2008 Financial Crisis," Papers 2508.09079, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    2. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2025. "Inter- and intra-domain knowledge flows: Examining their relationship with impact at the field level over time," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    3. Alexandre Truc, 2025. "The Disciplinary Mobility of Core Behavioral Economists [La mobilité disciplinaire des chercheurs au cœur de l’économie comportementale]," Post-Print hal-05543132, HAL.
    4. Angela Ambrosino & Mario Cedrini & John B. Davis, 2024. "Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 59-76, January.
    5. Florentin Gloetzl & Ernest Aigner, 2015. "Pluralism in the Market of Science? A citation network analysis of economic research at universities in Vienna," Ecological Economics Papers ieep5, Institute of Ecological Economics.
    6. Lorenzo Ductor & Bauke Visser, 2023. "Concentration of power at the editorial boards of economics journals," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 189-238, April.
    7. Lauren L. Ferry & Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Christina J. Schneider, 2020. "Catch me if you care: International development organizations and national corruption," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 767-792, October.
    8. Michelle Monique Meixieira Groenewald & Caro Carl Janse van Rensburg, 2025. "Toward Decolonizing and Feminist Pedagogies in Transforming Economics Classrooms," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 610-630, September.
    9. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2019. "Foreign in influence and domestic policy: A survey," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1928, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Damian Vergara, 2015. "La economía y su pretensión de ciencia exacta: Un comentario respecto del ejercicio académico de la profesión," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 17-24.
    11. Javdani, Moshen & Chang, Ha-Joon, 2019. "Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists," MPRA Paper 91958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Edilberto Rodríguez Araújo, 2022. "Los contornos de la ensenanza de las ciencias económicas en la región oriental de Colombia," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 41(74), pages 275-298.
    13. Oded Shenkar, 2025. "Towards interdisciplinarity in international business: national culture as an example," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(5), pages 559-566, July.
    14. Martina Cioni & Giovanni Federico & Michelangelo Vasta, 2023. "Is economic history changing its nature? Evidence from top journals," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 17(1), pages 23-48, January.
    15. Petar Sorić & Ivana Lolić & Marina Matošec, 2023. "The persistence of economic sentiment: a trip down memory lane," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(2), pages 371-395, April.
    16. Frank Bailly, 2022. "When mainstream economics does human resource management: a critique of personnel economics' prescriptive ambition," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(301), pages 103-117.
    17. Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
    18. John Hudson, 2017. "Identifying economics’ place amongst academic disciplines: a science or a social science?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 735-750, November.
    19. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    20. Ductor, Lorenzo & Visser, Bauke, 2022. "When a coauthor joins an editorial board," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 576-595.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05571516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.