IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05525551.html

Playing the scales: A strategy adopted by resistance coalitions for public value creation

Author

Listed:
  • Marija Roglic

    (EADA Business School Barchelona - EADA)

  • Florence Palpacuer

    (UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-ORGA - Montpellier Research in Management - Organisations - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM-MPR - Management et Pratiques Responsables - MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Daniel S Lacerda

Abstract

Local actors can defend public value by mobilizing resistance coalitions against threats from higher spatial scales. Drawing on existing scholarship on resistance movements and public value creation, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for understanding how local actors can protect public value from threats of rescaling driven solely by hegemonic discourses, and presents a strategy that we call 'playing the scales'. Our case study analyzes a Local Action Group's resistance to a state-imposed and EU-framed regulation that threatened local forms of value creation on the Croatian peninsula of Pelješac. Employing a longitudinal participatory approach, our findings outline the strategy of playing the scales, which involved three key tactics: gathering relevant knowledge from various scales; crafting an alternative narrative; and leveraging this narrative across scales to reshape the dominant organizational logic. The study contributes to the understanding of public value creation by showing how it can be defended by resistance coalitions that are capable of playing the scales. It also sheds light on alternative dynamics of rescaling that, rather than oppositional resistance to higher scales or attempts to scale up micro-practices can also be driven by trans-scalar alliances that inscribe the interests of local communities into dominant discourses.

Suggested Citation

  • Marija Roglic & Florence Palpacuer & Daniel S Lacerda, 2024. "Playing the scales: A strategy adopted by resistance coalitions for public value creation," Post-Print hal-05525551, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05525551
    DOI: 10.1177/13505084241236457
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05525551v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05525551v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13505084241236457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Augustyn, Anna & Nemes, Gusztav, "undated". "Catching up with the West? Europeanising rural policies in Hungary and Poland," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 168921, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Kristijan Kotarski & Zdravko Petak, 2021. "When EU Political Convergence Fails in New Member States: Corporate and Party State Capture in Croatia and the Czech Republic," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(4), pages 740-765, April.
    3. Jean Hartley & John Alford & Eva Knies & Scott Douglas, 2017. "Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 670-685, May.
    4. André Spicer & Graham Sewell, 2010. "From National Service to Global Player: Transforming the Organizational Logic of a Public Broadcaster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 913-943, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingzhu Wei & Tongrui Zhang, 2025. "Impact factors of open government information in the era of e-government," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek & Maciej Szymczak, 2024. "Understanding public service supply chain management: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1879-1943, September.
    3. Chuanming Sun & Guoxin Tan & Xingyu Chai & Haiqing Zhang, 2023. "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Public Cultural Service by Township Residents: A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen & Aguado-Moralejo, Itziar & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick, 2022. "Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Elisa Alt & Justin B. Craig, 2016. "Selling Issues with Solutions: Igniting Social Intrapreneurship in for-Profit Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 794-820, July.
    6. Bryan Dufour & Francesca Petrella & Nadine Richez‐Battesti, 2022. "Understanding social impact assessment through Public Value Theory: A comparative analysis on WISEs in France and Denmark," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 417-434, June.
    7. Kai Hockerts, 2015. "A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 102-122, February.
    8. Hoong, Yang & Rezania, Davar & Baker, Ron, 2024. "When traditional SME managers encounter cybersecurity: Discourse analysis of opportunities and dilemmas in meeting the demands," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Sanjai K. Parahoo & Ahmed A. Al-Nakeeb, 2019. "Investigating antecedents of social innovation in public sector using a service ecosystem lens," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 235-253, December.
    10. Cecilia Rossignoli & Francesca Ricciardi & Sabrina Bonomi, 2018. "Organizing for Commons-Enabling Decision-Making Under Conflicting Institutional Logics in Social Entrepreneurship," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 417-443, June.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:pj9ae_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Bonetti, Lisa & Lai, Alessandro & Stacchezzini, Riccardo, 2023. "Stakeholder engagement in the public utility sector: Evidence from Italian ESG reports," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Navarro, Francisco & Cejudo, Euginio & Maroto, Juan, 2016. "Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(01), pages 1-8, April.
    14. Luc Salemans & Tjerk Budding, 2022. "Operationalizing public value in higher education: the use of narratives as an alternative for performance indicators," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 337-363, June.
    15. Alessandro Zardini & Francesca Ricciardi & Ludovico Bullini Orlandi & Cecilia Rossignoli, 2020. "Business networks as breeding grounds for entrepreneurial options: organizational implications," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1029-1046, October.
    16. Stefano Marasca & Marco Gatti, 2020. "Editoriale. Il gap tra teoria e prassi negli studi di management accounting nel settore pubblico: alcune riflessioni," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 5-10.
    17. Markiewicz Joanna, 2018. "Value Creation by Support Organizations Through the Prism of Conflicting Institutional Logics," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(2), pages 122-135, June.
    18. Candel, Melissa & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Ribeiro, Barbara & Shapira, Philip, 2020. "Private and public values of innovation: A patent analysis of synthetic biology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    20. Isabelle Huault & Benjamin Taupin, 2012. "Les fondements moraux d’une logique institutionnelle. Contestation, controverses et stabilité," Post-Print hal-01637436, HAL.
    21. Mollona, Edoardo & Pareschi, Luca, 2020. "A gramscian perspective on field dynamics. The case of the privatization of Italian steel industry," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05525551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.