Author
Listed:
- Jingzhu Wei
(Sun Yat-sen University)
- Tongrui Zhang
(Sun Yat-sen University)
Abstract
Open government information (OGI) is critical in the e-government era for maintaining transparency and enhancing citizens’ trust. However, research from an institutional perspective remains limited, particularly regarding the influence of information characteristics, the integration of emerging information and communication technologies (ICTs), and the differences between voluntary OGI and OGI on request. This study addresses these gaps by surveying government agencies and interviewing government officers in China. Employing a mixed-method approach—including correlation analysis, principal component analysis, variance analysis, and regression analysis—the study examines the differences between the two OGI methods and identifies the key components of OGI. The findings indicate that voluntary OGI and OGI on request exhibit distinct correlations with institutional features. The principal components of OGI include supervision and mechanism, information technology and support, implementation complexity and reference, local development, openness awareness, and disclosure channel and cost. Moreover, the usefulness of the information to the public exerts a significant impact on OGI. U-shaped relationships are observed between the relevance of the affairs to the public and information technology and support, as well as between the room for improvement and openness awareness. Theoretically, this study advances the OGI literature by introducing the Chinese e-government context, differentiating between OGI methods, and emphasizing the critical role of information usefulness. Practically, it offers recommendations for government agencies to adopt additional ICTs, increase the disclosure of useful information, and implement diversified strategies for future OGI improvement.
Suggested Citation
Jingzhu Wei & Tongrui Zhang, 2025.
"Impact factors of open government information in the era of e-government,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05250-8
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05250-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05250-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.