IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05521838.html

Adoption of Innovative Urban Mobility: The Role of Citizens’ Eco-Responsible Sensitivity
[Adoption des mobilités urbaines innovantes : le rôle de la sensibilité écoresponsable du citoyen]

Author

Listed:
  • Stephane Magne

    (PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, LAREQUOI - Laboratoire de recherche en Management - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Thierry Côme

    (LAREQUOI - Laboratoire de recherche en Management - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Alexandre Steyer

    (PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

Smart cities are described as "intelligent" or "connected" cities in which innovation plays a central role. Environmental innovation represents a form of proximity innovation that directly affects citizens' daily lives. However, citizens vary in their sensitivity to the eco-responsible arguments put forward in territorial communication campaigns. This paper aims to understand the relationships between citizens' eco-responsible sensitivity, the perceived value, and the adoption of new urban mobility concepts (smart mobility), such as shared bicycles, e-scooters, electric bikes and scooters, eco-friendly public transport, electric car-sharing services, ride-sharing, and urban carpooling. The first section examines environmental innovation in smart cities and focuses on the specific dimension of smart mobility, defining innovative urban mobility solutions (IUMS) available to citizens. The second section develops an explanatory model of the adoption of these new mobility solutions in relation to users' eco-responsible sensitivity. The third phase involves data collection through an innovative online quanti-quali format, which combines quantitative structure with qualitative verbatim collection from a larger sample than traditional offline qualitative research. The drivers of IUMS adoption will be modeled using R software. The recommendations will focus on behavioral strategies that public authorities should prioritize in order to activate and guide the use of eco-responsible urban mobility solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephane Magne & Thierry Côme & Alexandre Steyer, 2019. "Adoption of Innovative Urban Mobility: The Role of Citizens’ Eco-Responsible Sensitivity [Adoption des mobilités urbaines innovantes : le rôle de la sensibilité écoresponsable du citoyen]," Post-Print hal-05521838, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05521838
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05521838v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05521838v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    2. Arnaud Riviere & Rémi Mencarelli, 2012. "Vers une clarification théorique de la notion de valeur perçue en marketing," Post-Print hal-02055377, HAL.
    3. Isabelle Nicolaï & Sylvie Faucheux, 2015. "Business models and the diffusion of eco-innovations in the eco-mobility sector," Post-Print hal-01799247, HAL.
    4. Timlett, R.E. & Williams, I.D., 2008. "Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 622-634.
    5. Jan Mattsson & Flemming Sørensen, 2015. "City renewal as open innovation," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 195-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabelle Nicolaï & Rémy Le Boennec, 2018. "Smart mobility providing smart cities," Post-Print halshs-01794612, HAL.
    2. Bobulescu, Roxana & Fritscheova, Aneta, 2021. "Convivial innovation in sustainable communities: Four cases in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Kawther Saeedi, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Household Engagement in Recycling via Blockchain-Based Loyalty Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    5. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    6. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Atkinson, Scott E. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2021. "Generalized estimation of productivity with multiple bad outputs: The importance of materials balance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1165-1186.
    8. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    9. Jae Yun Jeong & Inje Kang & Ki Seok Choi & Byeong-Hee Lee, 2018. "Network Analysis on Green Technology in National Research and Development Projects in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Thierry Côme & Stephane Magne & Alexandre Steyer, 2019. "To Be or Not to Be a Smart City: An Empirical Study of the Innovations Highlighted on City Websites [Être ou ne pas être une smart city : une étude empirique des innovations valorisées sur le site web des villes]," Post-Print hal-05522417, HAL.
    11. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Jacek Wysocki, 2021. "Innovative Green Initiatives in the Manufacturing SME Sector in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Aylin Cakanlar & Megan Hunter & Gergana Y. Nenkov, 2025. "Recycle right: How to decrease recycling contamination with informational point-of-disposal signage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 781-803, May.
    14. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    15. Liu, Jiangtao & Zhang, Yi & Kuang, Jia, 2023. "Fintech development and green innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    16. Vanessa Oltra & Maïder Saint Jean, 2007. "Incrementalism of environmental innovations versus paradigmatic change: a comparative study of the automotive and chemical industries," Post-Print hal-00155039, HAL.
    17. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Magadán-Díaz, Marta & Sotiriadis, Marios & Rivas-García, Jesús, 2019. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the Spanish hospitality industry," MPRA Paper 94090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Runar J. Solberg, 2023. "Incorporating the choice of centralized vs. decentralized resource allocation into sustainability frameworks," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 239-244, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05521838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.