IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05429435.html

Explaining the rarity gap of worker cooperatives between France and Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Thibault Mirabel

    (UPN - Université Paris Nanterre)

  • Marco Lomuscio

    (UNIPR - Università degli studi di Parma = University of Parma)

Abstract

This article examines why Italy has ten times more worker cooperatives than France. Since this rarity gap cannot be explained by higher death rates of French worker cooperatives in respect to Italian ones, we discuss the differences in barriers to worker cooperative entries in the two countries. We claim that such differences can hardly explain the difference of their rarity. Rather, we propose that the rarity gap of worker cooperatives between France and Italy is due to different institutional opportunity structures which raise the opportunity cost of French worker cooperatives relative to Italian ones. To do so, we perform a comparative institutional analysis, by hypothesising that substitution effects between institutions favouring worker cooperatives and those favouring workers' participation via alternative organisations could explain the worker-cooperative gap identified in the target countries. We stress that general institutions in favour of worker participation and workers' solidarity hinder the development of worker cooperatives, and that the prevalence of worker cooperatives in Italy is due to the hostile environment for worker participation. Our findings suggest that institutions favouring workers' participation can, paradoxically, limit the development of worker cooperatives by making them less attractive as means of economic participation relative to available alternative organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thibault Mirabel & Marco Lomuscio, 2025. "Explaining the rarity gap of worker cooperatives between France and Italy," Post-Print hal-05429435, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05429435
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2025.2478949
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05429435v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05429435v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02692171.2025.2478949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pencavel, John & Craig, Ben, 1994. "The Empirical Performance of Orthodox Models of the Firm: Conventional Firms and Worker Cooperatives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(4), pages 718-744, August.
    2. Gabriel Burdín, 2014. "Are Worker-Managed Firms More Likely to Fail Than Conventional Enterprises? Evidence from Uruguay," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(1), pages 202-238, January.
    3. Gabriel Burdín, 2016. "Equality Under Threat by the Talented: Evidence from Worker‐Managed Firms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(594), pages 1372-1403, August.
    4. Derek Jones & Panu Kalmi, 2015. "Membership and Performance in Finnish Financial Cooperatives: A New View of Cooperatives?," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 283-309, September.
    5. Derek C. Jones & Panu Kalmi & Takao Kato & Mikko Mäkinen, 2017. "Complementarities between Employee Involvement and Financial Participation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 70(2), pages 395-418, March.
    6. Samuel Bowles & Herbert Gintis, 1994. "Credit Market Imperfections And The Incidence Of Worker-Owned Firms," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 209-223, October.
    7. Millán Díaz-Foncea & Carmen Marcuello, 2015. "Spatial patterns in new firm formation: are cooperatives different?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 171-187, January.
    8. Preston R. Fee & Hugo M. Mialon & Michael A. Williams, 2004. "What Is a Barrier to Entry?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 461-465, May.
    9. Peter Cappelli & David Neumark, 2001. "Do “High-Performance†Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 737-775, July.
    10. Bonin, John P & Jones, Derek C & Putterman, Louis, 1993. "Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Producer Cooperatives: Will Ever the Twain Meet?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1290-1320, September.
    11. Loek Groot & Daan van der Linde, 2017. "The Labor-Managed Firm: Permanent or Start-Up Subsidies?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 1074-1093, October.
    12. Thibault Mirabel, 2021. "Survival advantage of worker buyouts over newly created worker-owned firms," Post-Print hal-05429433, HAL.
    13. Erik K. Olsen, 2013. "The Relative Survival of Worker Cooperatives and Barriers to Their Creation," Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, in: Sharing Ownership, Profits, and Decision-Making in the 21st Century, volume 14, pages 83-107, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    14. Williamson, Oliver E., 1980. "The organization of work a comparative institutional assessment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 5-38, March.
    15. Carlo Borzaga & Chiara Carini & Ermanno Celeste Tortia, 2022. "Co‐operative enterprise anti‐cyclicality and the economic crisis: A comparative analysis of employment dynamics in Italy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 551-577, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dow,Gregory K., 2019. "The Labor-Managed Firm," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107589650, November.
    2. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:65-86 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dean, Andrés, 2024. "Worker takeovers: a comparative analysis of employee buyouts, other worker-managed firms, and conventional firms in Uruguay," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20, pages 1-1, January.
    4. Albanese, Marina & Navarra, Cecilia & Tortia, Ermanno C., 2015. "Employer moral hazard and wage rigidity. The case of worker owned and investor owned firms," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 227-237.
    5. Gregory K. DOW, 2018. "The Theory Of The Labor-Managed Firm: Past, Present, And Future," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 65-86, March.
    6. Gabriel Burdín, 2016. "Equality Under Threat by the Talented: Evidence from Worker‐Managed Firms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(594), pages 1372-1403, August.
    7. albanese, marina & navarra, cecilia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2013. "Employer’s moral hazard and wage rigidity," MPRA Paper 46343, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Burdin, Gabriel & Landini, Fabio, 2025. "Beliefs and the Demand for Employee Ownership," IZA Discussion Papers 18196, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. TORTIA, Ermanno, 2025. "The economics and finance of dividend-based labor remuneration and tradable shares in worker cooperatives," MPRA Paper 125504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ermanno Tortia, 2014. "L'impresa come bene comune," AICCON Working Papers 131-2013, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    11. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno Tortia, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    12. Ohnishi, Kazuhiro, 2025. "Why labor-managed firms may not be socially desirable," MPRA Paper 126158, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Guillermo Alves & Gabriel Burdin & Paula Carrasco & Andrés Dean & Andrés Rius, 2012. "Empleo, remuneraciones e inversión en cooperativas de trabajadores y empresas convencionales: nueva evidencia para Uruguay," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 12-14, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    14. Ann Horowitz & Ira Horowitz, 1999. "Quality choice: Does it matter which workers own and manage the cooperative firm?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(4), pages 394-409, December.
    15. Gaetano Cuomo, 2015. "Imprese cooperative e democrazia economica," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(116), pages 5-38.
    16. Thibault Mirabel, 2021. "Survival advantage of worker buyouts over newly created worker-owned firms," Post-Print hal-05429433, HAL.
    17. Ben Craig & John Pencavel, 1995. "Participation and Productiviy: A Comparison of Worker Cooperatives and Conventional Firms in the Plywood Industry," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 26(1995 Micr), pages 121-174.
    18. Marina Albanese & Cecilia Navarra & Ermanno Tortia, 2019. "Equilibrium unemployment as a worker insurance device: wage setting in worker owned enterprises," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(3), pages 653-671, October.
    19. Fabio Sabatini & Francesca Modena & Ermanno Tortia, 2014. "Do cooperative enterprises create social trust?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 621-641, March.
    20. Andrés Dean, 2023. "Membership Heterogeneity and Workplace democracy," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 23-19, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    21. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno C. Tortia, 2013. "The Internal and External Governance of Cooperatives: Membership and Consistency of Values," Euricse Working Papers 1362, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J54 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Producer Cooperatives; Labor Managed Firms
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • J51 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
    • P13 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Cooperative Enterprises

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05429435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.