IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05369224.html

An exploratory analysis of learning from peers: Radial vs. nonradial efficiency measures and convex vs. nonconvex technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Kristiaan Kerstens

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - ULCO - Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Bart Roets
  • Ignace van de Woestyne

    (ORSTAT - Operations Research and Business Statistics - KU Leuven - Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)

  • Shirong Zhao

    (DUFES - Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian)

Abstract

This work investigates to which extent the known substantial differences between technical efficiencies on convex and nonconvex technologies translate into different learning possibilities. We also study whether radial and nonradial efficiency measures lead to a different learning experience. To our knowledge, these questions have never been investigated. Our empirical research is guided by three working hypotheses regarding how the analysis of peers facilitates learning by comparing on the one hand convex versus nonconvex technologies, and on the other hand radial versus nonradial efficiency measures. These working hypotheses are investigated using three distinct metrics: peer count, peer similarity, and peer dominance. We employ five existing secondary data sets and one large sample of more than 10,000 observations on Belgian traffic control centres in an effort to refute our three working hypotheses using these three metrics. Anticipating our conclusion, the combination of the logical, the statistical, and the managerial arguments against convexity is rather overwhelming in our data and we think that convexity is an axiom that should be scrutinized in all these three respects in all future methodological innovations as well as in empirical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristiaan Kerstens & Bart Roets & Ignace van de Woestyne & Shirong Zhao, 2025. "An exploratory analysis of learning from peers: Radial vs. nonradial efficiency measures and convex vs. nonconvex technologies," Post-Print hal-05369224, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05369224
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.062
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05369224v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05369224v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferrier, G. D. & Kerstens, K. & Vanden Eeckaut, P., 1994. "Radial and nonradial technical efficiency measures on a DEA reference technology: a comparison using US banking data," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1156, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. R. Russell & William Schworm, 2009. "Axiomatic foundations of efficiency measurement on data-generated technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 77-86, April.
    3. Krüger, Jens J., 2018. "Direct targeting of efficient DMUs for benchmarking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1-6.
    4. Leopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2006. "On Testing Equality of Distributions of Technical Efficiency Scores," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 497-522.
    5. Emrouznejad, Ali & Yang, Guo-liang, 2018. "A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 4-8.
    6. Jean-Paul Chavas & Kwansoo Kim, 2015. "Nonparametric analysis of technology and productivity under non-convexity: a neighborhood-based approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 59-74, February.
    7. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2022. "Nonconvexity in Production and Cost Functions: An Exploratory and Selective Review," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 18, pages 721-754, Springer.
    8. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2020. "Hypothesis testing in nonparametric models of production using multiple sample splits," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 287-303, June.
    9. Parkan, Celik, 1987. "Measuring the efficiency of service operations: An application to bank branches," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-4), pages 237-242, July.
    10. Ruggiero, John & Bretschneider, Stuart, 1998. "The weighted Russell measure of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 438-451, July.
    11. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding Growth?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 97-103, May.
    12. Halme, Merja & Korhonen, Pekka & Eskelinen, Juha, 2014. "Non-convex value efficiency analysis and its application to bank branch sales evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-18.
    13. Caitlin T. O’Loughlin & Paul W. Wilson, 2021. "Benchmarking the performance of US Municipalities," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2665-2700, June.
    14. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2017. "Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: A first empirical exploration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 576-586.
    15. Kneip, Alois & Simar, Léopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2015. "When Bias Kills The Variance: Central Limit Theorems For Dea And Fdh Efficiency Scores," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 394-422, April.
    16. Briec, Walter & Dumas, Audrey & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Stenger, Agathe, 2022. "Generalised commensurability properties of efficiency measures: Implications for productivity indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1481-1492.
    17. Fare, Rolf & Knox Lovell, C. A., 1978. "Measuring the technical efficiency of production," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 150-162, October.
    18. Krüger, Jens, 2018. "Direct Targeting of Efficient DMUs for Benchmarking," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 110812, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. Cinzia Daraio & Léopold Simar, 2016. "Efficiency and benchmarking with directional distances: a data-driven approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(7), pages 928-944, July.
    20. Borger, Bruno De & Ferrier, Gary D. & Kerstens, Kristiaan, 1998. "The choice of a technical efficiency measure on the free disposal hull reference technology: A comparison using US banking data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 427-446, March.
    21. Alois Kneip & Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2016. "Testing Hypotheses in Nonparametric Models of Production," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 435-456, July.
    22. Vladimir Batagelj & Matevz Bren, 1995. "Comparing resemblance measures," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(1), pages 73-90, March.
    23. Amy Apon & Linh Ngo & Michael Payne & Paul Wilson, 2015. "Assessing the effect of high performance computing capabilities on academic research output," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 283-312, February.
    24. Maria Silva Portela & Pedro Borges & Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 2003. "Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 251-269, April.
    25. N. Hung & C. Le Van & P. Michel, 2009. "Non-convex aggregate technology and optimal economic growth," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 457-471, September.
    26. R. Russell & William Schworm, 2011. "Properties of inefficiency indexes on 〈input, output〉 space," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 143-156, October.
    27. Mattia Casula & Nandhini Rangarajan & Patricia Shields, 2021. "The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1703-1725, October.
    28. Walter Briec & Audrey Dumas & Kristiaan Kerstens & Agathe Stenger, 2022. "Generalised commensurability properties of efficiency measures: Implications for productivity indicators," Post-Print hal-03702639, HAL.
    29. Topcu, Taylan G. & Triantis, Konstantinos & Roets, Bart, 2019. "Estimation of the workload boundary in socio-technical infrastructure management systems: The case of Belgian railroads," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 314-329.
    30. Sylvain Bouhnik & Boaz Golany & Ury Passy & Steven Hackman & Dimitra Vlatsa, 2001. "Lower Bound Restrictions on Intensities in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 241-261, November.
    31. Fan, Yanqin & Li, Qi & Weersink, Alfons, 1996. "Semiparametric Estimation of Stochastic Production Frontier Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(4), pages 460-468, October.
    32. Li, Qi & Maasoumi, Esfandiar & Racine, Jeffrey S., 2009. "A nonparametric test for equality of distributions with mixed categorical and continuous data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 186-200, February.
    33. Peter Bogetoft & Joseph M. Tama & Jørgen Tind, 2000. "Convex Input and Output Projections of Nonconvex Production Possibility Sets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 858-869, June.
    34. López-Torres, Laura & Johnes, Jill & Elliott, Caroline & Polo, Cristina, 2021. "The effects of competition and collaboration on efficiency in the UK independent school sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 40-53.
    35. Paul W. Wilson, 2021. "U.S. Banking in the Post-Crisis Era: New Results from New Methods," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Christopher F. Parmeter & Robin C. Sickles (ed.), Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, pages 233-264, Springer.
    36. Fare, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Logan, James, 1983. "The relative efficiency of Illinois electric utilities," Resources and Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 349-367, December.
    37. Roets, Bart & Verschelde, Marijn & Christiaens, Johan, 2018. "Multi-output efficiency and operational safety: An analysis of railway traffic control centre performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 224-237.
    38. Emrouznejad, Ali & Parker, Barnett R. & Tavares, Gabriel, 2008. "Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 151-157, September.
    39. Ghahraman, Abaghan & Prior, Diego, 2016. "A learning ladder toward efficiency: Proposing network-based stepwise benchmark selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 83-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2022. "Nonconvexity in Production and Cost Functions: An Exploratory and Selective Review," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 18, pages 721-754, Springer.
    2. Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi & Xiangyang Tao, 2025. "Nonradial plant capacity concepts: proposals and attainability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(1), pages 169-205, February.
    3. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Business Analytics: The Big Data Challenges and Some Solutions," CEPA Working Papers Series WP072019, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    4. Xiaoqing Chen & Kristiaan Kerstens & Qingyuan Zhu, 2025. "Exploring horizontal mergers in Swedish district courts using technical and scale efficiency: rejecting convexity in favour of nonconvexity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1319-1351, August.
    5. Kerstens, Kristiaan & O’Donnell, Christopher & Van de Woestyne, Ignace & Zhao, Shirong, 2026. "When cost metafrontiers are nonconvex in the outputs, then the production metafrontier is nonconvex: the price of a convexification strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 324-335.
    6. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    7. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Aggregate efficiency of industry and its groups: the case of Queensland public hospitals," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2795-2836, June.
    8. Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2020. "Aggregation of inputs and outputs prior to Data Envelopment Analysis under big data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 172-187.
    9. Nguyen, Bao Hoang & Simar, Léopold & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2022. "Data sharpening for improving central limit theorem approximations for data envelopment analysis–type efficiency estimators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1469-1480.
    10. Walter Briec & Laurent Cavaignac & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2020. "Input Efficiency Measures: A Generalized, Encompassing Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1836-1849, November.
    11. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2017. "Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: A first empirical exploration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 576-586.
    12. Paul W. Wilson & Shirong Zhao, 2025. "A non-parametric analysis of world productivity growth, 1990–2019," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(3), pages 2253-2285, March.
    13. Kuosmanen, Timo, 2001. "DEA with efficiency classification preserving conditional convexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 326-342, July.
    14. Lisciandra, Maurizio & Milani, Riccardo & Millemaci, Emanuele, 2022. "A corruption risk indicator for public procurement," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Kerstens, Kristiaan & O’Donnell, Christopher & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2019. "Metatechnology frontier and convexity: A restatement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 780-792.
    16. Chen, Xiaoqing & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Tsionas, Mike, 2024. "Does productivity change at all in Swedish district courts? Empirical analysis focusing on horizontal mergers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Kapelko, Magdalena & Oude Lansink, Alfons & Zofío, José L., 2022. "Endogenous dynamic inefficiency and optimal resource allocation: An application to the European Dietetic Food Industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1444-1457.
    18. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Léopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Data Sharpening for improving CLT approximations for DEA-type efficiency estimators," CEPA Working Papers Series WP142021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    19. Mette Asmild & Tomas Baležentis & Jens Leth Hougaard, 2016. "Multi-directional productivity change: MEA-Malmquist," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 109-119, December.
    20. Manh D. Pham & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2018. "Slack-based directional distance function in the presence of bad outputs: theory and application to Vietnamese banking," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 153-187, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05369224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.