IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05251334.html

Repenser l’inclusivité de la co-création : voies vers une participation élargie

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Potz

    (COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne, Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], FAYOL-ENSMSE - Institut Henri Fayol - Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], FAYOL-ENSMSE - Département Management responsable et innovation - ENSM ST-ETIENNE - Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de St Etienne - Institut Henri Fayol)

  • Hazal Koca

    (UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2)

Abstract

De plus en plus d'organisations publiques mettent en oeuvre des démarches participatives telles que la co-création pour renforcer le lien avec la population et concevoir des politiques publiques adaptées à ses besoins. Cependant, certains publics restent systématiquement absents de ces processus. Dans un premier temps, cet article propose quatre dimensions analytiques pour caractériser la co-création de politiques publiques et évaluer son ampleur d'une démarche à l'autre. Il examine ensuite la notion de non-participation et en analyse les déterminants. Enfin, cinq approches identifiées dans la littérature sont présentées comme susceptibles d'accroître l'inclusivité des démarches : l'« aller-vers », les incitations, les dispositifs numériques, la mobilisation d'ambassadeurs et le développement de compétences. S'adressant tant aux chercheurs qu'aux praticiens, l'article fournit ainsi des pistes concrètes pour mobiliser les publics habituellement « invisibles » et repenser l'inclusivité de la co-création.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Potz & Hazal Koca, 2025. "Repenser l’inclusivité de la co-création : voies vers une participation élargie," Post-Print hal-05251334, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251334
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05251334v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05251334v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veiko Lember & Taco Brandsen & Piret Tõnurist, 2019. "The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1665-1686, November.
    2. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2022. "Co‐creating ambitious climate change mitigation goals: The Copenhagen experience," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 572-587, April.
    3. Joaquin Navajas & Tamara Niella & Gerry Garbulsky & Bahador Bahrami & Mariano Sigman, 2018. "Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(2), pages 126-132, February.
    4. Sofie Marien & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2010. "Inequalities in Non-institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-level Analysis of 25 countries," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 187-213, February.
    5. Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, 2022. "Continuous co-creation: how ongoing involvement impacts outcomes of co-creation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 34-54, January.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:ap7wh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach," SocArXiv ap7wh, Center for Open Science.
    8. Sofie Marien & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2010. "Inequalities in Non‐institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi‐level Analysis of 25 countries," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 187-213, February.
    9. Swati Banerjee & P. K. Shajahan & Pravin Ghunnar & Mariya Shaikh, 2024. "Participatory Methodologies as People-Centered Social Innovation: Listening to Voices of People in Policy Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, November.
    10. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    11. Léon Acar & Trui Steen & Bram Verschuere, 2025. "Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 1357-1389, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaever, Anke & Rösner, Vanessa & Becker, Sophia & Scheidler, Viktoria, 2025. "Lived expertise of the structurally disadvantaged: towards a more just participatory transport planning process," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(3), pages 555-572.
    2. Luca Bettarelli & Caroline Close & Emilie van Haute, 2022. "Is Protest Only Negative? Examining the Effect of Emotions and Affective Polarization on Protest Behaviour," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 311-324.
    3. Jennifer Oser, 2017. "Assessing How Participators Combine Acts in Their “Political Tool Kits”: A Person-Centered Measurement Approach for Analyzing Citizen Participation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 235-258, August.
    4. Schaub, Max, 2021. "Acute Financial Hardship and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from the Sequence of Bank Working Days," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 115(4), pages 1258-1274.
    5. Johnson, Cathryn Evangeline, 2021. "Connecting Malian and Burkinabe women’s local experiences of livelihood security to how they participate in politics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Piotr Koc, 2021. "Measuring Non-electoral Political Participation: Bi-factor Model as a Tool to Extract Dimensions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 271-287, July.
    7. Rodon Casarramona, Toni & Guinjoan, Marc, 2018. "Mind the protest gap : the role of resources in the face of economic hardship," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87159, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Mario Quaranta, 2016. "An Apathetic Generation? Cohorts’ Patterns of Political Participation in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 793-812, February.
    9. Magdalena Potz & Solange Hernandez & Sarah Serval, 2024. "From Wicked Problems to the Wickedization of Solutions: The Case of the French Citizens Convention for Climate," Post-Print hal-04714400, HAL.
    10. Steven Gordon & Jarè Struwig & Benjamin Roberts & Ngqapheli Mchunu & Samela Mtyingizane & Thobeka Radebe, 2019. "What Drives Citizen Participation in Political Gatherings in Modern South Africa? A Quantitative Analysis of Self-Reported Behaviour," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 791-808, January.
    11. Leoné Walters & Carolyn Chisadza & Matthew Clance, 2024. "Slave trades, kinship structures and women's political participation in Africa," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 734-758, August.
    12. Ramos Javier & Padilla Javier & Chueca Enrique, 2019. "Abstentionism, Voting Advice Applications and Voting Activation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 55-85, June.
    13. Vanda Carreira & João Reis Machado & Lia Vasconcelos, 2016. "Engaging Citizen Participation—A Result of Trusting Governmental Institutions and Politicians in the Portuguese Democracy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Godfred Bonnah Nkansah, 2022. "Youth Cohort Size, Structural Socioeconomic Conditions, and Youth Protest Behavior in Democratic Societies (1995–2014)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    15. Ippolito, Marzia & Cozzolino, Adriano & Ercolano, Salvatore, 2024. "If you really love nothing. Evaluating second-order factors in the case of Italian constitutional referendum of 2020," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Stephan, Meret & Schürmann, Lennart, 2025. "How anti-racist protests influence pro- and anti-migration voting behavior: Evidence from national and European elections," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2025-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Reeves, Aaron & Mackenbach, Johan P., 2019. "Can inequalities in political participation explain health inequalities?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Cristina Campanale & Sara Giovanna Mauro & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 275-306, March.
    19. Edgar Alva & María Urcia & Vanina Vivas, 2023. "Civic Engagement of Future Citizens: An Insight from Peruvian Students’ Attitudes towards Relevant Societal Issues as Predictors of Expected Conventional Political Participation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(5), pages 2187-2221, October.
    20. Jung In Jo, 2016. "Weapons of the dissatisfied? Perceptions of socioeconomic inequality, redistributive preference, and political protest: Evidence from South Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(4), pages 285-300, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.