IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04670509.html

High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Kirkland

  • Paul a M van Lange
  • Drew Gorenz
  • Khandis Blake
  • Catherine E Amiot
  • Liisi Ausmees
  • Peter Baguma
  • Oumar Barry
  • Maja Becker

    (CLLE - Cognition, langues, langage, ergonomie - EPHE - École Pratique des Hautes Études - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UBM - Université Bordeaux Montaigne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TMBI - Toulouse Mind & Brain Institut - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Michal Bilewicz
  • Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat
  • Robert W Booth
  • Thomas Castelain
  • Giulio Costantini
  • Girts Dimdins
  • Agustín Espinosa
  • Gillian Finchilescu
  • Ronald Fischer
  • Malte Friese
  • Ángel Gómez
  • Roberto González
  • Nobuhiko Goto
  • Peter Halama
  • Camilo Hurtado-Parrado
  • Ruby D Ilustrisimo
  • Gabriela M Jiga-Boy
  • Peter Kuppens
  • Steve Loughnan
  • Khairul A Mastor
  • Neil Mclatchie
  • Lindsay M Novak
  • Blessing N Onyekachi
  • Muhammad Rizwan
  • Mark Schaller
  • Eleonora Serafimovska
  • Eunkook M Suh
  • William B Swann
  • Eddie M W Tong
  • Ana Torres
  • Rhiannon N Turner
  • Christin-Melanie Vauclair
  • Alexander Vinogradov
  • Zhechen Wang
  • Victoria Wai Lan Yeung
  • Brock Bastian

Abstract

Throughout the 21st century, economic inequality is predicted to increase as we face new challenges, from changes in the technological landscape to the growing climate crisis. It is crucial we understand how these changes in inequality may affect how people think and behave. We propose that economic inequality threatens the social fabric of society, in turn increasing moralization—that is, the greater tendency to employ or emphasize morality in everyday life—as an attempt to restore order and control. Using longitudinal data from X, formerly known as Twitter, our first study demonstrates that high economic inequality is associated with greater use of moral language online (e.g. the use of words such as "disgust", "hurt", and "respect'). Study 2 then examined data from 41 regions around the world, generally showing that higher inequality has a small association with harsher moral judgments of people's everyday actions. Together these findings demonstrate that economic inequality is linked to the tendency to see the world through a moral lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Kirkland & Paul a M van Lange & Drew Gorenz & Khandis Blake & Catherine E Amiot & Liisi Ausmees & Peter Baguma & Oumar Barry & Maja Becker & Michal Bilewicz & Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat & Robert, 2024. "High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization," Post-Print hal-04670509, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04670509
    DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae221
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04670509v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04670509v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian T. Elbæk & Panagiotis Mitkidis & Lene Aarøe & Tobias Otterbring, 2023. "Subjective socioeconomic status and income inequality are associated with self-reported morality across 67 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    3. Singh-Manoux, Archana & Adler, Nancy E. & Marmot, Michael G., 2003. "Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1321-1333, March.
    4. Yongzheng Yang & Sara Konrath, 2023. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between economic inequality and prosocial behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1899-1916, November.
    5. Costanza Naguib, 2017. "The Relationship between Inequality and Growth: Evidence from New Data," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 153(3), pages 183-225, July.
    6. Knell, Markus & Stix, Helmut, 2020. "Perceptions of inequality," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. William J. Brady & Killian L. McLoughlin & Mark P. Torres & Kara F. Luo & Maria Gendron & M. J. Crockett, 2023. "Overperception of moral outrage in online social networks inflates beliefs about intergroup hostility," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 917-927, June.
    8. M. J. Crockett, 2017. "Moral outrage in the digital age," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(11), pages 769-771, November.
    9. Marlon Mooijman & Joe Hoover & Ying Lin & Heng Ji & Morteza Dehghani, 2018. "Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 389-396, June.
    10. Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    11. Alexander J. Stewart & Nolan McCarty & Joanna J. Bryson, 2018. "Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline," Papers 1807.11477, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    12. Ali Teymoori & Jolanda Jetten & Brock Bastian & Amarina Ariyanto & Frédérique Autin & Nadia Ayub & Constantina Badea & Tomasz Besta & Fabrizio Butera & Rui Costa-Lopes & Lijuan Cui & Carole Fantini & , 2016. "Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Dana A. Glei & Noreen Goldman & Maxine Weinstein, 2018. "Perception has its Own Reality: Subjective versus Objective Measures of Economic Distress," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 695-722, December.
    14. Garrett, Kristin N. & Bankert, Alexa, 2020. "The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 621-640, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyle S. H. Dobson & Andrea G. Dittmann & David S. Yeager, 2025. "A transparency statement improves trust in community-police interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Otterbring, Tobias & Folwarczny, Michał, 2024. "Social validation, reciprocation, and sustainable orientation: Cultivating “clean†codes of conduct through social influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Frederich Kirsten & Ilse Botha & Mduduzi Biyase & Marinda Pretorius, 2023. "Determinants of Subjective Social Status in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Johanna Köchling & Julia E. Koller & Jana Straßheim & Yannic Rehm & Lucas Chancel & Claudia Diehl & Harald T. Schupp & Britta Renner, 2025. "The carbon perception gap in actual and ideal carbon footprints across wealth groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Dorsa Amir & Claudia Valeggia & Mahesh Srinivasan & Lawrence S Sugiyama & Yarrow Dunham, 2019. "Measuring subjective social status in children of diverse societies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Columbus, Simon & Böhm, Robert, 2021. "Norm shifts under the strategy method," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 1267-1289, September.
    7. Timea Marton & Jinglong Wang & Amaury Vaysse & Wei Yu & Pierre-Henri Commere & Quentin Holleville & Tristan Espie-Caullet & Richard Frock & Ludovic Deriano, 2025. "Polymerase theta repairs persistent G1-induced DNA breaks in S-phase during class switch recombination," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:fqmdu_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sibilla Di Guida & Ido Erev & Davide Marchiori, 2014. "Cross Cultural Differences in Decisions from Experience: Evidence from Denmark, Israel and Taiwain," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2014-16, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Hind Dib‐slamani & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2021. "Is theft considered less severe when the victim is a foreign company?," Post-Print hal-03340844, HAL.
    12. Shi, Yun & Cui, Xiangyu & Zhou, Xunyu, 2020. "Beta and Coskewness Pricing: Perspective from Probability Weighting," SocArXiv 5rqhv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Teruaki Kido & Yuko Yotsumoto & Masamichi J. Hayashi, 2025. "Hierarchical representations of relative numerical magnitudes in the human frontoparietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Brady, David, 2023. "Poverty, not the poor," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(34), pages 1-17.
    15. Raymond Hernandez & Elizabeth A. Pyatak & Cheryl L. P. Vigen & Haomiao Jin & Stefan Schneider & Donna Spruijt-Metz & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Understanding Worker Well-Being Relative to High-Workload and Recovery Activities across a Whole Day: Pilot Testing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Christopher Hassall & Michael Nisbet & Evan Norcliffe & He Wang, 2024. "The Potential Health Benefits of Urban Tree Planting Suggested through Immersive Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Kyriaki Remoundou & Drichoutis Andreas & Phoebe Koundouri, 2010. "Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?," DEOS Working Papers 1028, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    19. Elisabeth Beckmann & Lukas Olbrich & Joseph Sakshaug, 2024. "Multivariate assessment of interviewer-related errors in a cross-national economic survey (Lukas Olbrich, Elisabeth Beckmann, Joseph W. Sakshaug)," Working Papers 253, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    20. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    21. Marco Manacorda & Guido Tabellini & Andrea Tesei, 2022. "Mobile internet and the rise of political tribalism in Europe," CEP Discussion Papers dp1877, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04670509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.