IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-61505-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The carbon perception gap in actual and ideal carbon footprints across wealth groups

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Köchling

    (University of Konstanz
    University of Konstanz)

  • Julia E. Koller

    (University of Konstanz)

  • Jana Straßheim

    (University of Konstanz
    University of Konstanz)

  • Yannic Rehm

    (Paris School of Economics)

  • Lucas Chancel

    (Paris School of Economics
    Sciences Po)

  • Claudia Diehl

    (University of Konstanz)

  • Harald T. Schupp

    (University of Konstanz
    University of Konstanz)

  • Britta Renner

    (University of Konstanz
    University of Konstanz)

Abstract

Carbon inequality is gaining attention in public discussions surrounding equitable climate policies. It commonly refers to the unequal distribution of individual greenhouse gas emissions, with wealthier individuals contributing disproportionately higher emissions. Little is known about how people perceive the actual carbon footprint distribution across wealth groups and what they would desire as an ideal distribution. Survey data from Germany show awareness of carbon inequality, with respondents recognizing that wealthier individuals emit disproportionately more. Yet, with surprising consensus, all groups, including the wealthy, desired an inverse ideal distribution, with the wealthy having disproportionately smaller carbon footprints. Nonetheless, most perceived their own carbon footprint as far better compared to others in society and within their wealth group. Here, we show a carbon perception gap, particularly among the wealthiest: Collectively, people acknowledge the presence of carbon inequality and desire a more equitable distribution, yet often perceive themselves as already contributing more than others.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Köchling & Julia E. Koller & Jana Straßheim & Yannic Rehm & Lucas Chancel & Claudia Diehl & Harald T. Schupp & Britta Renner, 2025. "The carbon perception gap in actual and ideal carbon footprints across wealth groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61505-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61505-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61505-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-61505-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty, 2015. "Carbon and inequality: From Kyoto to Paris Trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998-2013) & prospects for an equitable adaptation fund World Inequality Lab," Working Papers halshs-02655266, HAL.
    2. Michael I. Norton & Dan Ariely, 2013. "American's desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(3), pages 393-394, May.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:393-394 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Knell, Markus & Stix, Helmut, 2020. "Perceptions of inequality," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Bernardo Andretti & Yan Vieites & Guilherme A. Ramos & Larissa Elmor & Eduardo B. Andrade, 2024. "Underestimations of the income-based ecological footprint inequality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Kristoffer B Hvidberg & Claus T Kreiner & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 3083-3118.
    7. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," Post-Print halshs-04157767, HAL.
    8. Charlotte A. Kukowski & Emma E. Garnett, 2024. "Tackling inequality is essential for behaviour change for net zero," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 2-4, January.
    9. Arnold Tukker & Bart Jansen, 2006. "Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(3), pages 159-182, July.
    10. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    11. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 931-938, November.
    12. Brilé Anderson & Thomas Bernauer & Stefano Balietti, 2017. "Effects of fairness principles on willingness to pay for climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 447-461, June.
    13. Norton, Michael I. & Ariely, Dan, 2013. "American’s desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 393-394, May.
    14. Seth Wynes & Jiaying Zhao & Simon D. Donner, 2020. "How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1521-1534, October.
    15. Adrian R. Camilleri & Richard P. Larrick & Shajuti Hossain & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2019. "Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 53-58, January.
    16. Beiser-McGrath, Liam & Busemeyer, Marius R., 2023. "Carbon inequality and support for carbon taxation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120925, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Gregg Sparkman & Nathan Geiger & Elke U. Weber, 2022. "Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Vladimir Gimpelson & Daniel Treisman, 2018. "Misperceiving inequality," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 27-54, March.
    19. Dominic Lemken & Anke Zühlsdorf & Achim Spiller, 2021. "Improving Consumers’ Understanding and Use of Carbon Footprint Labels on Food: Proposal for a Climate Score Label," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(2), pages 23-29, August.
    20. Kristian S. Nielsen & Jan M. Bauer & Ramit Debnath & Charles A. Emogor & Sonja M. Geiger & Sakshi Ghai & Wencke Gwozdz & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2024. "Underestimation of personal carbon footprint inequality in four diverse countries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(11), pages 1136-1143, November.
    21. Peter Andre & Teodora Boneva & Felix Chopra & Armin Falk, 2024. "Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(3), pages 253-259, March.
    22. Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-04157767, HAL.
    23. Sommer, Stephan & Mattauch, Linus & Pahle, Michael, 2022. "Supporting carbon taxes: The role of fairness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    24. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    25. Michael Berkebile-Weinberg & Danielle Goldwert & Kimberly C. Doell & Jay J. Bavel & Madalina Vlasceanu, 2024. "The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    26. Benedikt Bruckner & Klaus Hubacek & Yuli Shan & Honglin Zhong & Kuishuang Feng, 2022. "Impacts of poverty alleviation on national and global carbon emissions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 311-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oskar Lindgren & Erik Elwing & Mikael Karlsson & Sverker C. Jagers, 2024. "Public acceptability of climate-motivated rationing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Tobias Angel & Alexandre Berthe & Valeria Costantini & Mariagrazia D’Angeli, 2024. "How the nature of inequality reduction matters for CO2 emissions," Working Papers 2024.14, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Cappelli, Federica & Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2025. "What is the role of profit and luxury consumption in the ecological transition?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Cappelli, Federica & Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2024. "What role for profits and luxury consumption in the ecological transition?," IPE Working Papers 245/2024, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    5. Malanima, Paolo, 2024. "International inequality in energy use and CO2 emissions (1820–2020)," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 233-244.
    6. Malerba, Daniele & Roscioli, Federico & Gaentzsch, Anja & Ward, Hauke, 2024. "Changing carbon footprints and the consequent impacts of carbon taxes and cash transfers on poverty and inequality across years: A Peruvian case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Missbach, Leonard & Steckel, Jan Christoph, 2024. "Distributional impacts of climate policy and effective compensation: Evidence from 88 countries," EconStor Preprints 296491, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. repec:ssa:lemwps:2025/04 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yuru Guan & Yuli Shan & Ye Hang & Qingyun Nie & Yu Liu & Klaus Hubacek, 2025. "Unlocking global carbon reduction potential by embracing low-carbon lifestyles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Federica Cappelli, 2024. "Unequal contributions to CO2 emissions along the income distribution within and between countries," Working Papers 2024.06, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Gao, Xue & Chen, Xuan & Liu, Lan-Cui, 2024. "Exploring the determinants of the evolution of urban and rural household carbon footprints inequality in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Apeti, Ablam Estel & Bambe, Bao We Wal & Edoh, Eyah Denise & Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Wealth inequality and carbon inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Cappelli, Federica, 2024. "Unequal contributions to CO2 emissions along the income distribution within and between countries," FEEM Working Papers 341641, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Tian, Peipei & Ma, Haoyu & Zhang, Zeyi & Yu, Yang & Li, Dan, 2025. "China's current carbon inequality is predominantly determined by capital disparity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Drews, Stefan, 2025. "Towards systems-oriented behavioral ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Zhong, Honglin & Zhang, Xinyu & Shao, Xuan & Xiao, Jingyi & Tian, Peipei, 2024. "Dissecting household carbon and energy inequality: A decade's insight into regional disparities and urban-rural dynamics in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Lijun Summerhayes & Douglas Baker & Karen Vella, 2024. "Food diversity and accessibility enabled urban environments for sustainable food consumption: a case study of Brisbane, Australia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Nepal, Rabindra & Zander, Kerstin K., 2025. "Are natural disasters stumbling blocks to carbon inequality mitigation? A global perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. El Tinay, Hassan & Schor, Juliet B., 2025. "Do economists think about climate change and inequality? Semantic analysis and topic modeling of top five economics journals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Nicolli, Francesco & Gilli, Marianna & Vona, Francesco, 2025. "Inequality and climate change: Two problems, one solution?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    21. Francisco Estrada & Veronica Lupi & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Richard S. J. Tol, 2025. "Urban and non-urban contributions to the social cost of carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61505-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.