IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04432414.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Litigating Payouts or Not? Evidence from Universal Demand Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Huilin Zhang
  • Sabri Boubaker

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • Xiaroan Ni

    (Swansea University)

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that high litigation risk may induce firms to reduce payouts. By contrast, litigation can be an effective governance tool for shareholders to claim payouts. To examine which view dominates, we exploit the staggered adoption of universal demand (UD) laws across various U.S. states, which raise the hurdle of filing derivative lawsuits and reduce the ex-ante litigation risk of affected firms as quasi-exogenous shocks to examine the effect of litigation risk on firms' payouts. We find that the adoption of UD laws leads to a significant increase in a firm's payouts, i.e., higher litigation risk discourages payouts. In particular, reduced litigation risk discourages the emission of cash dividends and encourages the initiation of share repurchases. The main effect is more pronounced for firms faced with higher litigation risk, that are more financially distressed, and that operate in more competitive product markets. Our overall findings suggest that excessive threats of derivative lawsuits may dampen financial flexibility and deter the distribution of cash to shareholders. \textcopyright 2023

Suggested Citation

  • Huilin Zhang & Sabri Boubaker & Xiaroan Ni, 2024. "Litigating Payouts or Not? Evidence from Universal Demand Laws," Post-Print hal-04432414, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04432414
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate governance; Derivative lawsuit; Payouts; Shareholder litigation; Universal demand law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04432414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.