IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01691943.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organisational innovation and coopetition between SMEs: a tertius strategies approach

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Granata

    (Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • Mickaël Géraudel

    (CEROM - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Organisations et le Management - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • Katherine Gundolf

    (Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • Johanna Gast
  • Pierre Marques

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

Abstract

Being vulnerable to environmental forces, small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) seek to supplement their insufficient resources by adopting coopetition strategies in order to reduce uncertainty. This longitudinal study of the union of wine producers in Pic Saint-Loup relies on 45 interviews conducted during multiple data collection moments and provides an understanding of how competing SMEs can develop cooperative strategies. In doing so, we present the development stages of coopetition strategies as well as the role of stakeholders in this development. Next, we accentuate the tertius strategies SME managers prefer to implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Granata & Mickaël Géraudel & Katherine Gundolf & Johanna Gast & Pierre Marques, 2016. "Organisational innovation and coopetition between SMEs: a tertius strategies approach," Post-Print hal-01691943, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01691943
    DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2016.077975
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01691943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01691943/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1504/IJTM.2016.077975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew H. Van de Ven & Douglas Polley, 1992. "Learning While Innovating," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 92-116, February.
    2. Kenneth E. Knight, 1967. "A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 478-478.
    3. Wojciech Czakon, 2009. "Power asymmetries, flexibility and the propensity to coopete: an empirical investigation of SMEs' relationships with franchisors," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 44-60.
    4. Barthelemy Chollet & Mickaël Géraudel & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2013. "Generating Business Referrals for SMEs: The Contingent Value of CEOs' Social Capital," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00915173, HAL.
    5. David Salvetat & Mickaël Géraudel, 2012. "The tertius roles in a coopetitve context : The case of the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector," Post-Print hal-00828121, HAL.
    6. Salvetat, David & Géraudel, Mickaël, 2012. "The tertius roles in a coopetitive context: The case of the European aeronautical and aerospace engineering sector," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 603-614.
    7. Rudi K. F. Bresser, 1988. "Matching collective and competitive strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 375-385, July.
    8. Benjamin Neville & Bulent Menguc, 2006. "Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 377-391, July.
    9. Giovanna Padula & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2007. "Untangling the Rise of Coopetition: The Intrusion of Competition in a Cooperative Game Structure," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 32-52, January.
    10. Christiane Hipp & Bruce S. Tether & Ian Miles, 2000. "The Incidence And Effects Of Innovation In Services: Evidence From Germany," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 417-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angelo Riviezzo & Antonella Garofano & Julien Granata & Samaneh Kakavand, 2017. "Using terroir to exploit local identity and cultural heritage in marketing strategies: An exploratory study among Italian and French wine producers," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(2), pages 136-149, May.
    2. Sascha Kraus & Jasmin Schmid & Johanna Gast, 2017. "Innovation through coopetition: An analysis of small-and medium-sized trust companies operating in the Liechtenstein financial centre," Post-Print hal-02945322, HAL.
    3. Anne Albert Cromarias & Alexandre Asselineau, 2024. "One for all or everyone for themselves: why is coopetition so difficult? The case of four small vineyards in central France," Post-Print hal-03631930, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Granata & Marie-Clémence da Fonseca & Pierre Marques & Mickaël Géraudel, 2016. "The dynamic of SMEs collective strategy: the case of Pic Saint-Loup winemakers [Dynamique d'évolution d'une stratégie collective entre PME : le cas des vignerons du Pic Saint- Loup]," Post-Print hal-01588177, HAL.
    2. Julien Granata & Marie Clémence da Fonseca & Pierre Marques & Mickaël Géraudel, 2016. "Dynamique d'évolution d'une stratégie collective entre PME : le cas des vignerons du Pic Saint-Loup," Post-Print hal-01794519, HAL.
    3. Korpas, Edyta & De Beule, Filip & Verwaal, Ernst, 2021. "Dependence and uncertainty in broker strategies of research intermediaries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 34-45.
    4. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    5. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Sascha Kraus & Jasmin Schmid & Johanna Gast, 2017. "Innovation through coopetition: An analysis of small-and medium-sized trust companies operating in the Liechtenstein financial centre," Post-Print hal-02945322, HAL.
    7. Hubert J. Kiss & Alfonso Rosa-Garcia & Vita Zhukova, 2019. "Coopetition in group contest," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1911, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Silvius Stanciu & Cezar Bichescu & Alexandru Căpățînă & George-Bogdan Drăgan & Andrei-Mirel Florea, 2018. "Enablers and inhibitors of collaborative network development in organic food industry: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    9. Katsaliaki, Korina & Kumar, Sameer & Loulos, Vasilis, 2024. "Supply chain coopetition: A review of structures, mechanisms and dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    10. Ritala, Paavo & Huizingh, Eelko & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Wijbenga, Paul, 2017. "Tensions in R&D networks: Implications for knowledge search and integration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 311-322.
    11. Jean Sébastien Lacam & David Salvetat & Jean-Sébastien Lacam, 2017. "The complexity of co-opetitive networks," Post-Print hal-02083201, HAL.
    12. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    13. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    14. Carmen Nastase & Carmen Chasovschi & Mihai Popescu & Adrian Liviu Scutariu, 2010. "The Importance of Stakeholders and Policy Influence Enhancing the Innovation in Nature Based Tourism Services Greece, Austria, Finland and Romania Case Studies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 137-148.
    15. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    16. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.
    17. Pia Lotila, 2010. "Corporate Responsiveness to Social Pressure: An Interaction-Based Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 395-409, July.
    18. Iris Aaltio & Hans Menzel & Jan Ulijn, 2006. "On the way to creativity: engineers as intrapreneurs in organizations," Working Papers 06-06, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2006.
    19. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    20. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Guilherme Schreiber Pereira & Rafael Marques & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, 2018. "Systemic Understanding of Coopetitive Behaviour in a Latin American Technological Park," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 479-494, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01691943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.