IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01533529.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Generation and distribution of the total factor productivity gains in US industries

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Philippe Boussemart

    (UFR MIME - UFR de Mathématiques, Informatique, Management, Economie - Université de Lille, Sciences Humaines et Sociales, IESEG - School of Management, LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Herve Leleu

    (UCL FGES - Université Catholique de Lille - Faculté de gestion, économie et sciences - ICL - Institut Catholique de Lille - UCL - Université catholique de Lille, LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Edward Mensah

Abstract

This study estimates productivity gains and their distribution among inputs and outputs for 63 American industries over the period 1987–2012. Using the traditional surplus accounting method, the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth rates are divided into their price change components in order to determine the stakeholders who do or do not receive price advantages. An initial analysis showed that TFP of US industries increased at an average trend of 0.8% and established that remunerations to employees and firms' profitability constituted 49% and 39%, respectively, of the accumulated economic surplus from the productivity gains. Suppliers of intermediate inputs retained 12.1% of the surplus. Finally, customers, equipment and structure providers were the losers in the distribution of economic surplus via, respectively, a significant growth of relative final demand prices and a substantial price decrease of these assets. A second step analysis underlined that industries with high TFP growth rates mainly benefited customers and firms via output price decreases and profitability improvements while industries with low or negative TFP changes hurt customers through significant output price increases. The sectoral level analysis also showed that employees' remunerations depend only slightly on productivity gains produced within their industrial sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Philippe Boussemart & Herve Leleu & Edward Mensah, 2016. "Generation and distribution of the total factor productivity gains in US industries," Post-Print hal-01533529, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01533529
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1240344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fried, Harold O. & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Shelton S. (ed.), 2008. "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195183528.
    2. Charles R. Hulten & Edwin R. Dean & Michael J. Harper, 2001. "New Developments in Productivity Analysis," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number hult01-1, March.
    3. Emmanuel Saez, 2012. "Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates)," Technical Notes 201202, World Inequality Lab.
    4. John W. Kendrick, 1961. "Productivity Trends in the United States," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number kend61-1, March.
    5. Emmanuel Saez, 2013. "Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2011 preliminary estimates)," Technical Notes 201301, World Inequality Lab.
    6. Emmanuel Saez, 2013. "Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2012 preliminary estimates)," Technical Notes 201303, World Inequality Lab.
    7. Dale W. Jorgenson & Paul Schreyer, 2013. "Industry-Level Productivity Measurement And The 2008 System Of National Accounts," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 59(2), pages 185-211, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Leleu, Hervé & Mensah, Edward & Shitikova, Karina, 2020. "Technological catching-up and structural convergence among US industries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 135-146.
    2. Arnaud Sergent & Jean-François Ruault & Vincent Banos & Mathieu Nefe & David Chen & Anne-Laure Levet & Wilfried Eliegbo Amouzou, 2018. "La compétitivité des filières locales pour la construction bois : état des lieux, enjeux et perspectives d’évolution," Working Papers hal-03277129, HAL.
    3. Tomas Balezentis & Vaida Sapolaite, 2022. "Productivity surplus and its distribution in Lithuanian agriculture," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 721-740, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clément Bellet, 2017. "Essays on Inequality, Social Preferences and Consumer Behavior," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o, Sciences Po.
    2. Michael Manville & David A. King & Michael J. Smart, 2017. "The Driving Downturn: A Preliminary Assessment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 42-55, January.
    3. Jon D. Wisman & Aaron Pacitti, 2015. "What the American Elite Won over the Past 35 Years and What All Other Americans Lost," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 197-221, May.
    4. Hyatt, Henry R. & Spletzer, James R., 2017. "The recent decline of single quarter jobs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 166-176.
    5. Yýlmaz Akyüz, 2014. "Crisis Mismanagement in The United States And Europe: Impact On Developing Countries And Longer-Term Consequences," Working Papers 2014/3, Turkish Economic Association.
    6. Thomas A Hirschl & Mark R Rank, 2015. "The Life Course Dynamics of Affluence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Lisa D. Cook & Janet Gerson & Jennifer Kuan, 2021. "Closing the Innovation Gap in Pink and Black," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 1, pages 43-66, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Clément Bellet, 2017. "Essays on inequality, social preferences and consumer behavior [Inégalités, préférences sociales et comportement du consommateur]," SciencePo Working papers tel-03455045, HAL.
    9. Salvatore Morelli, 2018. "Banking crises in the US: the response of top income shares in a historical perspective," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 257-294, June.
    10. Malone, Thom, 2020. "There goes the neighborhood does tipping exist amongst income groups?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. Andrea Yoder Clark & Nicole Blumenfeld & Eric Lal & Shikar Darbari & Shiyang Northwood & Ashkan Wadpey, 2021. "Using K-Means Cluster Analysis and Decision Trees to Highlight Significant Factors Leading to Homelessness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Sam Ransbotham & Robert G. Fichman & Ram Gopal & Alok Gupta, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Ubiquitous IT and Digital Vulnerabilities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 834-847, December.
    13. Julian Friedland & Benjamin M. Cole, 2019. "From Homo-economicus to Homo-virtus: A System-Theoretic Model for Raising Moral Self-Awareness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 191-205, March.
    14. Herrera, Ana María & Rangaraju, Sandeep Kumar, 2019. "The quantitative effects of tax foresight: Not all states are equal," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Henrik Braconier & Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela, 2014. "Gross Earning Inequalities in OECD Countries and Major Non-member Economies: Determinants and Future Scenarios," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1139, OECD Publishing.
    16. Streeck, Wolfgang, 2013. "The politics of public debt: Neoliberalism, capitalist development, and the restructuring of the state," MPIfG Discussion Paper 13/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Ernest M. Zampelli & Steven T. Yen, 2021. "Individual Attitudes Toward Government’s Role in Redistributing Income in the United States: Analysis by Ideological Subgroups," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(1), pages 115-137, March.
    18. Wolfgang Streeck, 2014. "The Politics of Public Debt: Neoliberalism, Capitalist Development and the Restructuring of the State," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 15(1), pages 143-165, February.
    19. Sebastian-Ilie DRAGOE, 2016. "Inequality Fragility Hypothesis," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 4(2), pages 34-52.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o6r34k5bcm3iopv is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ronald Degen, 2014. "How graduate business schools professors can assist in reducing today's lack of ethics in business," Working Papers 109, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity accounting; surplus accounting method; total factor productivity; factor income distribution; index numbers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01533529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.