IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01424613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comment aborder l'interdisciplinarité de l'économie des organisations ?

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Chabaud

    (LBNC - Laboratoire Biens, Normes, Contrats - AU - Avignon Université)

  • Claude Parthenay

    (UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11)

  • Yannick Perez

    (UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11)

Abstract

A partir de l'exemple de la théorie des organisations, cet article soulève la question des conditions de possibilité d'un dialogue entre des champs scientifiques différents (économie, psychologie, sociologie, sciences de gestion, droit, etc.). Si la recherche de fertilisations croisées entre les matières est souvent revendiquée (cf. Schmidt (2006) pour la liaison économie et psychologie) cette recherche ne doit pas, pour reprendre l'expression de Schumpeter (1954, p. 55), se transformer en « stérilisation croisée ». Dans cet article, nous abordons la question des conditions de possibilité d'un dialogue entre les sciences à partir de ce qui fait leur socle commun : la prétention au vrai. Cette prétention a deux conséquences importantes. D'une part, le contenu du discours ne doit pas entrer en contradiction avec cette prétention. C'est ce qu'en philosophie on nomme un argument transcendantal, dont les implications ont été développées par Bitbol (2000) pour la physique, Apel (1976) pour la communication, ou encore Thomas-Fogiel (2000, 2003) pour la philosophie. D'autre part, les compétences prêtées à l'homme de science-et plus généralement à tout individu-ne doivent pas exclure la possibilité de tenir un discours qui puisse prétendre au vrai. Par exemple, si l'on définit l'individu comme entièrement déterminé par ses conditions économiques, sociales, son histoire ou son inconscient, alors il n'est plus possible de poser un discours qui puisse prétendre au vrai (Parthenay 2008a). Or, le débat épistémologique concernant la portée des théories économiques des organisations est marqué par une absence de ce type d'analyse, et c'est cette lacune que cet article se propose de combler. Ainsi, en appliquant cette grille d'analyse à l'économie des organisations, il sera possible de montrer comment certaines théories peuvent être réfutées, mais aussi d'en tirer trois conséquences constructives : 1) L'argument transcendantal autorise la construction d'une grammaire simple pour les comparaisons entre approches dans le champ de la théorie des organisations. 2) Il permet de mesurer les points limite de certaines théories et d'en fournir l'explication comme le montre notre exemple de l'analyse des travaux d'Herbert Simon (référence). 3) Enfin, il fonde la possibilité de fertilisations croisées entre les théories des organisations. 2

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Chabaud & Claude Parthenay & Yannick Perez, 2009. "Comment aborder l'interdisciplinarité de l'économie des organisations ?," Post-Print hal-01424613, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01424613
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01424613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01424613/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Schmidt, 2006. "Quelques points de rencontre entre économistes et psychologues," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(2), pages 242-257.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/618 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Herbert A. Simon, 1991. "Organizations and Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 25-44, Spring.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1994. "Visible and Invisible Governance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 323-326, May.
    5. Jérôme Gautié, 2007. "L'économie à ses frontières (sociologie, psychologie). Quelques pistes," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 58(4), pages 927-939.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9792 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pammolli, Fabio & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2002. "Technological Regimes and the Growth of Networks: An Empirical Analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 205-215, November.
    2. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "Will the institution of coexistence be re-defined by TTIP?," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211478, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
    3. Scharpf, Fritz W. & Mohr, Matthias, 1994. "Efficient self-coordination in policy networks: A simulation study," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Davis, Carlton George & Langham, Max R., 1995. "Agricultural Industrialization And Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-14, July.
    5. David Pastoriza & Miguel Ariño & Joan Ricart, 2008. "Ethical Managerial Behaviour as an Antecedent of Organizational Social Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 329-341, March.
    6. Cordes, Christian & Richerson, Peter J. & McElreath, Richard & Strimling, Pontus, 2008. "A naturalistic approach to the theory of the firm: The role of cooperation and cultural evolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 125-139, October.
    7. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2001. "The Soft Budget Constraint: A Theoretical Clarification," Post-Print hal-00629160, HAL.
    8. Adolfo Lopez Paredes & Cesáreo Hernández Iglesias, 1999. "Beyond Experimental Economics: Trading Institutions and Multiagent Systems," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 1351, Society for Computational Economics.
    9. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    10. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2002. "New perspectives on public finance: recent achievements and future challenges," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 341-360, December.
    11. David Ellerman, 2005. "The two institutional logics: exit-oriented versus commitment-oriented institutional designs," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 147-168.
    12. Bernard Baudry, 1992. "Contrat, autorité et confiance. La relation de sous-traitance est-elle assimilable à la relation d'emploi ?," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(5), pages 871-894.
    13. V. Pelligra, 2004. "How to incentive Who? Intra-personal and inter-personal mechanisms," Working Paper CRENoS 200404, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    14. Rodríguez-López, Nuria & Diz-Comesaña, María Eva, 2016. "Efeito mediador do controle formal e informal na forma de governo," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 56(6), November.
    15. Augier, Mie & March, James G., 2002. "A model scholar: Herbert A. Simon (1916-2001)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Herbert A. Simon, 1993. "Strategy and organizational evolution," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 131-142, December.
    17. Pieter H.M. Ruys & René van den Brink & Radislav Semenov, 2000. "Values and governance systems," Chapters, in: Claude Ménard (ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations, chapter 27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Alessandro Lomi, 1997. "Markets with Hierarchies and the Network Structure of Organizational Communities," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 1(1), pages 49-66, March.
    19. Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2000. "Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 159-181, Summer.
    20. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01424613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.