IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01133769.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design, meaning making and constructive fixation: conceptualizing semiotic conditions to the process of designing

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Jutant

    (ENSCI Les Ateliers - Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Création Industrielle - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - SU - Sorbonne Université)

  • Annie Gentes

    (Institut Mines-Telecom - Télécom ParisTech)

  • Mathias Béjean

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

  • Cédric Mivielle

    (LTCI - Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l'Information - Télécom ParisTech - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Current debates in design question the effects of " fixation. " On the one hand, to be creative, designers should avoid fixing the meaning of objects or proposals, On the other hand, positive effects of fixation have also been observed in various design practices. For instance, " early fixation " or " early crystallization " have been conceptualized as ways that significantly help starting the design work without limiting its creative potential. To understand these contrasting positions, we take a semiotic perspective on the phenomenon of fixation. Peirce's triadic model of sign (representamen, object, interpretant), defines meaning making as an infinite process through the " interpretant " based on personal and social experience. Fixation is therefore a basic semiotic condition through which human beings make sense of the world. As pointed by Peirce, the " final " interpretant is the way by which we can actually communicate meaning to further expand it. Following on this model and the Peircean categories (firstness, secondness, thirdness) we identify three different ways in design that structure how meaning making can be stabilized, e.g.: the feeling of some potential (firstness); the combination of events or things (secondness); the establishment of a belief, habit or law (thirdness).

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Jutant & Annie Gentes & Mathias Béjean & Cédric Mivielle, 2013. "Design, meaning making and constructive fixation: conceptualizing semiotic conditions to the process of designing," Post-Print hal-01133769, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01133769
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01133769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01133769/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick, David Glen, 1986. "Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 196-213, September.
    2. Mathias Bejean & Annie Gentes, 2013. "Looking through tools and situations: organizing exploration in artistic practice," Post-Print hal-00865242, HAL.
    3. Annie Gentes & Mathias Béjean, 2011. "Making sense of constellations of objects: a case study of computer-aided writing practices in theatrical staging," Post-Print hal-01133795, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    2. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Gaetano Nino Miceli & Stefania Farace, 2013. "Self o mass branding? La relazione tra personalizzazione e marca," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(4), pages 149-171.
    3. Noyan Ulusoy & Zeynep Onur, 2023. "Visual Signs at Sociable Place Entrances: User Perceptions and Preferences," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    4. Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2022. "Navigating Between the Plots: A Narratological and Ethical Analysis of Business-Related Conspiracy Theories (BrCTs)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 265-288, January.
    5. Celhay, Franck & Cheng, Peiyao & Masson, Josselin & Li, Wenhua, 2020. "Package graphic design and communication across cultures: An investigation of Chinese consumers' interpretation of imported wine labels," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 108-128.
    6. Bamini KPD.Balakrishnan & Samuel Lee & Azlinda Shazneem Md.Shuaib & Najihah Hanisah Marmaya, 2009. "The Impact Of Brand Personality On Brand Preference And Loyalty: Empirical Evidence From Malaysia," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 109-119.
    7. Maria Antonietta Raimondo & Stefania Farace & Gaetano Nino Miceli, 2018. "User-Generated Systems of Signs and Meanings in Product Customization: Taxonomies and Research Directions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 61-83.
    8. Ana Paula Celso de Miranda & Eduardo Jorge Carvalho Maciel & Olga Maria Coutinho Pepece, 2016. "Meaning and Values in the Consumption of Fashion by Men," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 97-104, December.
    9. Anne Rindell & Fernando Pinto Santos, 2021. "What makes a corporate heritage brand authentic for consumers? A semiotic approach," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(5), pages 545-558, September.
    10. Michael Thomas, 2019. "Was Television Responsible for a New Generation of Smokers?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 689-707.
    11. Mi Hyun Lee & Sang Pil Han & Sungho Park & Wonseok Oh, 2023. "Positive Demand Spillover of Popular App Adoption: Implications for Platform Owners’ Management of Complements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 961-995, September.
    12. Moritz Loock & Diane M. Phillips, 2020. "A Firm’s Financial Reputation vs. Sustainability Reputation: Do Consumers Really Care?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Golinvaux Antoine & Evagelou Ioannis, 2017. "The Role of Semiotics in Tourism Destination Branding through Social Media: The Case of Switzerland," Tourism Research Institute, Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 16(1), pages 207-219, June.
    14. Hsiu-Li Liao & Su-Houn Liu & Chi-Wen Lin, 2013. "Information, Experience and Destination Marketing - The Influence of Interactivity on Tourism Website," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 58-69, August.
    15. Michael W. Major, 2022. "Resume Research Questions Through the Seven Philosophical Foundations of Communication," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Damien Chaney & Renaud Lunardo & Rémi Mencarelli, 2018. "Consumption experience: past, present and future," Post-Print hal-01951670, HAL.
    17. Miceli, Gaetano “Nino” & Raimondo, Maria Antonietta & Farace, Stefania, 2013. "Customer Attitude and Dispositions Towards Customized Products: The Interaction Between Customization Model and Brand," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 209-225.
    18. Heejin Jung & Gyehee Lee & Kyungsuk Hur & Taegoo Terry Kim, 2018. "Online travel information value and its influence on the continuance usage intention of social media," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 85-120, March.
    19. Angy Geerts & Nathalie Veg-Sala, 2011. "Evidence On Internet Communication Management Strategies For Luxury Brands," Post-Print hal-01532821, HAL.
    20. Holttinen, Heli, 2014. "Contextualizing value propositions: Examining how consumers experience value propositions in their practices," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 103-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01133769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.