IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gov/wpaper/2001.html

Country performance during the Covid-19 pandemic: Externalities, coordination and the role of institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Lago-Peñas
  • Jorge Martinez-Vazquez
  • Agnese Sacchi

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic is one of the most powerful examples of negative externalities across the globe. We focus on the role played by institutions at the country level in fighting the spread of Covid-19 by making policy coordination more difficult or, on the contrary, more effective. Specifically, we consider the type of political regimes, political fragmentation and decentralization settings. We use the most recent available information on Covid-19 performance for up to 115 countries around the world. Our main results show that having either democracies or autocracies does not represent a crucial issue for successfully addressing the pandemic. Most significantly, countries with centralized political parties, which fundamentally allow for better coordination at the national level, perform significantly better than those with decentralized ones. However, the assignment of policy responsibilities to sub-national governments is an impediment in fighting the Covid-19 emergency.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Lago-Peñas & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Agnese Sacchi, 2020. "Country performance during the Covid-19 pandemic: Externalities, coordination and the role of institutions," Working Papers. Collection A: Public economics, governance and decentralization 2001, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
  • Handle: RePEc:gov:wpaper:2001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://infogen.webs.uvigo.es/WP/WP2001.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Chiara Burlina, 2021. "Institutions and the uneven geography of the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 728-752, September.
    2. Uchimura, Hiroko & Jütting, Johannes P., 2009. "Fiscal Decentralization, Chinese Style: Good for Health Outcomes?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 1926-1934, December.
    3. de Haan, Jakob & Siermann, Clemens L J, 1996. "New Evidence on the Relationship between Democracy and Economic Growth," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 86(1-2), pages 175-198, January.
    4. Ellingsen, Tore, 1998. "Externalities vs internalities: a model of political integration," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 251-268, May.
    5. Schellekens,Philip & Sourrouille,Diego M., 2020. "COVID-19 Mortality in Rich and Poor Countries : A Tale of Two Pandemics ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9260, The World Bank.
    6. Anila Channa & Jean-Paul Faguet, 2016. "Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-Adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 31(2), pages 199-241.
    7. Ignacio Lago-Peñas & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2011. "Decentralization and the Nationalization of Party Systems," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(2), pages 244-263, April.
    8. Terrence Iverson & Edward Barbier, 2021. "National and Sub-National Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Charles R. Hankla & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Raúl A. Ponce Rodríguez, 2019. "Local Accountability and National Coordination in Fiscal Federalism," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18495.
    10. Carozzi, Felipe & Provenzano, Sandro & Roth, Sefi, 2020. "Urban Density and COVID-19," IZA Discussion Papers 13440, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 2003. "Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 2611-2637, December.
    12. Robert Dur & Hein Roelfsema, 2005. "Why does centralisation fail to internalise policy externalities?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 395-416, March.
    13. ,, 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 14872, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    14. Ignacio Lago-Peñas & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2009. "Does the nationalization of party systems affect the composition of public spending?," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 85-98, January.
    15. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    16. Daron Acemoglu & Suresh Naidu & Pascual Restrepo & James A. Robinson, 2019. "Democracy Does Cause Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(1), pages 47-100.
    17. Snower, Dennis J., 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," IZA Policy Papers 162, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Shima Hamidi & Sadegh Sabouri & Reid Ewing, 2020. "Does Density Aggravate the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(4), pages 495-509, October.
    19. Peter Klibanoff & Jonathan Morduch, 1995. "Decentralization, Externalities, and Efficiency," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 62(2), pages 223-247.
    20. Felipe Carozzi & Sandro Provenzano & Sefi Roth, 2020. "Urban density and Covid-19," CEP Discussion Papers dp1711, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    21. Ceyhun Elgin & Oguz Oztunali, 2012. "Shadow Economies around the World: Model Based Estimates," Working Papers 2012/05, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    22. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Agnese Sacchi, 2017. "The Impact Of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1095-1129, September.
    23. Dennis J. Snower, 2020. "The Socio-Economics of Pandemics Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 8314, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klaudijo Klaser, 2020. "A Theory of Justice of John Rawls as Basis for European Fiscal Union," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 11(1-2).
    2. Emanuele Millemaci & Fabio Monteforte & Jonathan R. W. Temple, 2025. "Have Autocrats Governed for the Long Term?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 440-465, May.
    3. Emmanuel Mutambara & Cele Thanduxolo J, 2023. "Assessing the functionality of the department of the education in disruptive times using the Viable System Model: Case of the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Education, South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(2), pages 513-528, March.
    4. María Cadaval-Sampedro & Ana Herrero-Alcalde & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2025. "Extreme events and the resilience of decentralised governance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2255627-225, December.
    5. Debalke, Negash Mulatu, 2023. "Exploring Disparate Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic and its Containment Measures on Food Security within Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 118288, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2023.
    6. Ryota Nakatani & Qianqian Zhang & Isaura Garcia Valdes, 2024. "Health Expenditure Decentralization and Health Outcomes: The Importance of Governance," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(1), pages 59-87.
    7. Valentin Burcă & Oana Bogdan & Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget & Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu, 2024. "Corporate Financial Performance vs. Corporate Sustainability Performance, between Earnings Management and Process Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-43, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Wang, Han, 2021. "Local institutions and pandemics: City autonomy and the Black Death," CEPR Discussion Papers 16593, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:5xerm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Grégoire Rota Graziosi, 2009. "On the Strategic Use of Representative Democracy in International Agreements," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(2), pages 281-296, April.
    4. Richard Florida & Charlotta Mellander, 2022. "The geography of COVID-19 in Sweden," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 125-150, February.
    5. Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Howland, Renata & Glied, Sherry, 2023. "Demons of density do higher-density environments put people at greater risk of contagious disease?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    6. Nadia Yusuf & Lamia Saud Shesha, 2021. "Economic Role of Population Density during Pandemics—A Comparative Analysis of Saudi Arabia and China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Gerritse, Michiel, 2022. "COVID-19 transmission in cities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Raúl A. Ponce-Rodríguez & Charles R. Hankla & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Eunice Heredia-Ortiz, 2020. "The politics of fiscal federalism: Building a stronger decentralization theorem," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 32(4), pages 605-639, October.
    9. Ryusuke Shinohara, 2021. "Interregional negotiations and strategic delegation under government subsidy schemes," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(3), pages 551-582, June.
    10. Pajaron, Marjorie C. & Vasquez, Glacer Niño A., 2021. "How effective is community quarantine in the Philippines? A quasi-experimental analysis," GLO Discussion Paper Series 782, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2021. "How COVID-19 reshaped quality of life in cities: A synthesis and implications for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Jan Krzysztof Solarz & Krzysztof Waliszewski, 2020. "Holistic Framework for COVID-19 Pandemic as Systemic Risk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 340-351.
    13. Gavin Shatkin & Vivek Mishra & Maria Khristine Alvarez, 2023. "Debates Paper: COVID-19 and urban informality: Exploring the implications of the pandemic for the politics of planning and inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1771-1791, July.
    14. Gradstein, Mark, 2004. "Political Bargaining in a Federation: Buchanan meets Coase," CEPR Discussion Papers 4188, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. Perugini, Francesco, 2024. "Local government efficiency and economic growth: The Italian case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Arsena Gjipali & Valbona Karapici & Nevila Baci, 2023. "How Do the Labour Force Characteristics Encounter COVID-19 Economic Consequences—A Canadian Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Bumjoon Kang & Jaewoong Won & Eun Jung Kim, 2021. "COVID-19 Impact on Residential Preferences in the Early-Stage Outbreak in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Andreas P Kyriacou & Oriol Roca-Sagalés, 2024. "Fiscal Decentralization and Health Care Access and Quality: Evidence from Local Governments around the World," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(2), pages 313-338.
    19. Andy Hong & Sandip Chakrabarti, 2023. "Compact living or policy inaction? Effects of urban density and lockdown on the COVID-19 outbreak in the US," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1588-1609, July.
    20. Peter Klibanoff & Michel Poitevin, 2022. "A theory of (de)centralization," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(3), pages 417-451, June.
    21. Hung-Ying Chen & Colin McFarlane & Priyam Tripathy, 2024. "Density and pandemic urbanism: Exposure and networked density in Manila and Taipei," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 1526-1544, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gov:wpaper:2001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricio Sanchez-Fernandez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/geviges.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.