IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprwp/178821.html

Updating yield growth rates in the IMPACT model to enhance global analysis of the future of agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Hareau, G.
  • Rosegrant, Mark W.
  • Andrade, Robert
  • Petsakos, Athanasios
  • Sulser, Timothy B.
  • Chamberlin, Jordan
  • Sonder, Kai
  • Kihiu, Evelyne
  • Suarez, V.
  • Cenacchi, Nicola
  • Dunston, Shahnila
  • Hartley, Faaiqa
  • Mishra, Abhijeet
  • Thomas, Timothy S.
  • Alene, Arega D.
  • Gbegbelegbe, Sika
  • Mjuma, Andrea
  • Enahoro, Dolapo K.
  • Petnkeu, Jeronya Mbiatat
  • Antonio, Ronald Jeremy S.
  • Cabrera, Ellanie
  • Basnet, Shyam
  • Gimutao, Maureen
  • Pede, Velerien
  • Chan, Chin Yee
  • Chung, Ka Yi Karen
  • Sari, Evren Can

Abstract

Changes in yields of food commodities are key drivers—and consequences—of changes in agriculture and food systems. Simulation models used to explore the future of agriculture require initial assumptions about baseline levels and changes in yields as a starting point and then can be used to analyze how those yields are affected by the dynamic interaction between changes in demand, markets, technology, climate and other factors. This paper reports on how critical initial yield assumptions have recently been reviewed and updated in the International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT). This paper is aimed at a technical audience interested in core details of the IMPACT modeling framework and is a follow-up to the latest full model documentation (Robinson et al 2024). IMPACT was developed at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) at the beginning of the 1990s to address a lack of long-term vision and consensus among policymakers and researchers about the actions necessary to feed the world in the future, reduce poverty, and protect the natural resource base. Over time, this economic model has been expanded and improved, and IMPACT is now a system of linked models around a core multimarket economic model of global production, trade, demand, and prices for agricultural commodities. IMPACT supports integrated analysis of the implications of physical, biophysical, and socioeconomic trends and phenomena, allowing for varied and in-depth analysis on a variety of key issues of interest to policymakers. As a flexible policy analysis tool, IMPACT has been used to research linkages between agricultural production and food security at the national and regional levels. IMPACT also has been used in commodity-level scenario analyses and has contributed to thematic and interdisciplinary scenario-based projects. IMPACT is one of major global models of the agriculture sector, but because of its high level of commodity and geographic disaggregation, it plays a particularly important role in analyzing patterns of agricultural productivity growth around the world. Potential commodity yields are key drivers in the IMPACT baseline scenario and an important lever influenced by investment and policy scenarios. The baseline assumptions about exogenous growth in crop and livestock yields are referred to in IMPACT as “intrinsic productivity growth rates” (IPRs). This paper describes the approach developed to review and update the IPRs to reflect recent trends and incorporate expert1 opinion, making the yield projections more transparent, inclusive, and efficient, and more consistent across CGIAR centers, improving projections and enhancing policy relevance. The remaining sections include a description of the IMPACT Model, the methods for updating the IPRs using projections based on FAOSTAT data and expert consultations, the findings related to the IPRs from each of the expert consultations, and a description of the process used to incorporate the findings from the consultations into IMPACT and concludes with discussion. A description of the Power BI tool used to support the expert consultations is presented in Appendix A.

Suggested Citation

  • Hareau, G. & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Andrade, Robert & Petsakos, Athanasios & Sulser, Timothy B. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Sonder, Kai & Kihiu, Evelyne & Suarez, V. & Cenacchi, Nicola & Dunston, Shahnila & , 2025. "Updating yield growth rates in the IMPACT model to enhance global analysis of the future of agriculture," IFPRI working papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:178821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/178821
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evenson, Robert E. & Pray, Carl E. & Rosegrant, Mark W., 1999. "Agricultural research and productivity growth in India," Research reports 109, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Evenson, Robert E. & Pray, Carl E. & Rosegrant, Mark W., 1999. "Agricultural research and productivity growth in India," Research Reports 37901, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janaiah, Aldas & Achoth, Lalith & Bantilan, Ma Cynthia S., 2005. "Has Green Revolution Bypassed Coarse Cereals? The Indian Experience," eJADE: electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Agricultural and Development Economics Division (ESA), vol. 2(01), pages 1-12.
    2. Kathayat, Babita & Dixit, Anil K & Chandel, B S & Sendhil, R & Sharma, A K, . "Economic impact of public research investment on livestock productivity: evidence from India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 35(Conferenc).
    3. repec:ags:phajad:199094 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Shujat Ali, 2005. "Total Factor Productivity Growth and Agricultural Research and Extension: An Analysis of Pakistan's Agriculture, 1960-1996," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 729-746.
    5. Yufei Cao & Salem Hamad Aldawsari & Maria Luiza Hrestic & Raul Adrian Lile & Cristina Baldan & Daniela Mihai & Marinela Barbulescu Tanascovici & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2025. "Does the Green Economy Influence Environmental Sustainability? Nexus Between Staple Food Crops Consumption and Total Factor Productivity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2800-2816, March.
    6. Kiresur, V.R. & Melinamani, V.P., 2008. "Inter-Linkages Among Agricultural Research Investment, Agricultural Productivity and Rural Poverty in India," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44389, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Kumar, Praduman & Mittal, Surabhi, 2006. "Agricultural Productivity Trends in India: Sustainability Issues," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(Conferenc).
    8. Pal, Suresh & Mathur, Prasoon & Jha, A. K., 2005. "Impact of Agricultural Research in India: Is it Decelerating?," Policy Briefs 344887, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    9. Agarwal, Shaily & Birthal, Pratap Singh & Joshi, Pramod Kumar & Negi, Digvijay S., 2014. "Changing sources of growth in Indian agriculture: Implications for regional priorities for accelerating agricultural growth:," IFPRI discussion papers 1325, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Pal, Suresh & Byerlee, Derek R., 2003. "The Funding And Organization Of Agricultural Research In India: Evolution And Emerging Issues," Policy Papers 11870, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    11. repec:ags:icar24:11870 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, P. B. R. & Thorat, Sukhadeo, 1999. "Linkages between government spending, growth, and poverty in rural India," Research reports 110, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Shikur, Zewdie Habte, 2021. "Potato and Tomato Supply and Yield Responses to Policy in Ethiopia," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 9(4), September.
    14. Rezitis, Anthony & Mishra, Ashok & Kumar, Shalander, . "Indians Demanding More Plant-Based Protein but Farmers' Profits Drop: Empirical Evidence to Understand the Dilemma," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(01).
    15. Singh, K.M. & Meena, M.S. & Swanson, B.E. & Reddy, M.N. & Bahal, R., 2014. "In-depth Study of the Pluralistic Agricultural Extension System in India," MPRA Paper 59461, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Sep 2014.
    16. Sheahan, Megan & Barrett, Christopher B., 2017. "Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 12-25.
    17. Dessy, Sylvain & Mbiekop, Flaubert & Pallage, Stéphane, 2010. "On the mechanics of trade-induced structural transformation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 251-264, March.
    18. SJ, Balaji & Babu, Suresh Chandra & Pal, Suresh, 2021. "Understanding Science and Policy Making in Agriculture: A Machine Learning Application for India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315227, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Sajjad, Haroon & Prasad, Sandip, 2014. "Analyzing Spatio-temporal Pattern of Crop Diversification in Jalandhar District of Punjab, India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 4(03), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Kumar, Sanjeev & Upadhay, Sanjay Kumar & Joshi, Devna, 2020. "Sources of Agricultural Growth and Its Determinants: A Regional Analysis of Uttar Pradesh," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 75(01), January.
    21. A.Banerji & Gauri Khanna & J.V. Meenakshi, 2006. "Markets, Institutions And Efficiency Groundwater Irrigation In North India," Working papers 152, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    22. Saxena, R. & Naveen, P. & Balaji, S.J. & Ahuja, Usha R. & Joshi, Deepika, 2017. "Strategy for Doubling Income of Farmers in India," Policy Papers 345003, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:178821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.