IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/gsspwp/179187.html

When the cure is worse than the disease: Acaricide use, tick resistance, and systemic constraints in Uganda’s dairy sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kariuki, Sarah
  • Muteti, Francisca N.
  • Vudriko, Patrick
  • Ariong, Richard M.
  • Van Campenhout, Bjorn
  • Chamberlin, Jordan

Abstract

The Ugandan dairy sector has expanded rapidly in recent years. However, ticks and tick-borne diseases pose increasing challenges to this progress, exacerbated by the rise in resistance to acaricides, the primary method for tick control. This paper examines the systemic constraints that undermine effective, safe, and sustainable tick control in Uganda’s liberalized dairy system. Drawing on multiple complementary data sources—including household surveys, exit interviews, list experiments, and covert audit methods—we show that the de facto farmer-led model of tick control is characterized by failures in information, coordination challenges, imperfect input markets, and weak regulation. Farmers operate with limited technical knowledge and minimal advisory support, and under extensive grazing systems and frequent inter-herd contact that require coordinated approaches to tick control. Input markets provide access to acaricides, but little guidance on proper use. As a result, misuse and overuse of chemicals are widespread, generating risks for animal and human well-being, food safety, and environmental integrity. Addressing these constraints will require integrated interventions that strengthen extension and regulatory capacity, improve accountability in veterinary input markets, and foster community-level coordination to ensure safe and sustainable tick control.

Suggested Citation

  • Kariuki, Sarah & Muteti, Francisca N. & Vudriko, Patrick & Ariong, Richard M. & Van Campenhout, Bjorn & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2025. "When the cure is worse than the disease: Acaricide use, tick resistance, and systemic constraints in Uganda’s dairy sector," GSSP working papers 2389, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179187
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bjorn Van Campenhout & Bart Minten & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2021. "Leading the way – foreign direct investment and dairy value chain upgrading in Uganda," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 607-631, July.
    2. Immaculate Omondi & Elizaphan J. O. Rao & Aziz A. Karimov & Isabelle Baltenweck, 2017. "Processor Linkages and Farm Household Productivity: Evidence from Dairy Hubs in East Africa," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 586-599, September.
    3. George W. Norton & Jeffrey Alwang, 2020. "Changes in Agricultural Extension and Implications for Farmer Adoption of New Practices," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 8-20, March.
    4. McKee, Gregory J., 2011. "Coordinated pest management decisions in the presence of management externalities: The case of greenhouse whitefly in California-grown strawberries," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 94-103, January.
    5. Gershon Feder & Regina Birner & Jock R. Anderson, 2011. "The private sector's role in agricultural extension systems: potential and limitations," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 31-54, June.
    6. Maha Ashour & Daniel Orth Gilligan & Jessica Blumer Hoel & Naureen Iqbal Karachiwalla, 2019. "Do Beliefs About Herbicide Quality Correspond with Actual Quality in Local Markets? Evidence from Uganda," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1285-1306, June.
    7. Michelson, Hope & Fairbairn, Anna & Ellison, Brenna & Maertens, Annemie & Manyong, Victor, 2021. "Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Gershon Feder & Regina Birner & Jock R. Anderson, 2011. "The private sector's role in agricultural extension systems: potential and limitations," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 31-54, June.
    9. Rutsaert, Pieter & Donovan, Jason & Kimenju, Simon, 2021. "Demand-side challenges to increase sales of new maize hybrids in Kenya," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. David A. Hennessy & Christopher A. Wolf, 2018. "Asymmetric Information, Externalities and Incentives in Animal Disease Prevention and Control," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 226-242, February.
    11. Manzoor H. Dar & Alain de Janvry & Kyle Emerick & Elisabeth Sadoulet & Eleanor Wiseman, 2024. "Private Input Suppliers as Information Agents for Technology Adoption in Agriculture," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 219-248, April.
    12. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jayson N. Olayta & Roscefe B. Dy, 2025. "Modalities, Effectiveness and Accessibility of Extension Services Delivered to the Clienteles in the Municipality of Guinobatan, Province of Albay," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 2524-2533, September.
    2. Yingzheng Yan & Liupeng Chen & Ziwei Zhou & Yuanzhu Wei, 2025. "Digital financial inclusion and agricultural modernization development in China—a study based on the perspective of agricultural mechanization services," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Hope Michelson, 2025. "Navigating the Measurement Frontier: New Insights Into Small Farm Realities," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 526-542, May.
    5. Lorraine Balaine & Doris Läpple & Emma J Dillon & Cathal Buckley, 2023. "Extension and management pathways for enhanced farm sustainability: evidence from Irish dairy farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 810-850.
    6. Cansın Arslan & Daniel Gregg & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Paying more to make less: value degrading in the coffee value chain in eastern Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 96-117, January.
    7. Aymeric Ricome & Amy Faye & Cheickh S. Fall & Sergio Gomez‐y‐Paloma, 2025. "The impact of access to agricultural advisory services on input use and farm performance: Evidence from Senegal," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 896-914, July.
    8. Kibrom A. Abay & Tesfamicheal Wossen & Jordan Chamberlin, 2023. "Mismeasurement and efficiency estimates: Evidence from smallholder survey data in Africa," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 413-434, June.
    9. Hazrana, Jaweriah & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "Effect of input subsidies and extension services: Evidence from rice productivity in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Wossen, Tesfamicheal & Abay, Kibrom A. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2022. "Misperceiving and misreporting input quality: Implications for input use and productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Michelson, Hope & Gourlay, Sydney & Lybbert, Travis & Wollburg, Philip, 2023. "Review: Purchased agricultural input quality and small farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian & Maredia, Mywish K. & Narayanan, Sudha & Belton, Ben & Kabir, Razin, 2025. "Nudging farmers toward disease-free shrimp technology with financial incentives: Experimental evidence from Bangladesh," IFPRI working papers 178761, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Coville, Aidan & Graff Zivin, Joshua & Reichert, Arndt & Reitmann, Ann-Kristin, 2025. "Quality signaling and demand for renewable energy technology: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Barriga, Alicia & Fiala, Nathan, 2020. "The supply chain for seed in Uganda: Where does it go wrong?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Paola Mallia, 2022. "You reap what (you think) you sow? Evidence on farmers’behavioral adjustments in the case of correct crop varietal identification," PSE Working Papers hal-03597332, HAL.
    16. repec:ags:aaea22:335821 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Abate, Gashaw T. & Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Kassim, Yumna & Spielman, David J. & Paul Jr Tabe-Ojong, Martin, 2023. "Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Yasin,Yasin & Dr. HAULE, S.C., (Ph.d) & Prof. Mvena, Z. S. K. & Dr. Gosbert Lukenku Shausi, 2024. "Information Needs and Sources Used by Urban Vegetable Farmers. A Case of Vegetable Farmers in Morogoro Municipality," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(6), pages 2856-2867, June.
    19. Bjorn Van Campenhout & Anusha De, 2023. "Gendered perceptions in maize supply chains: Evidence from Uganda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    20. Erwin Bulte & Robert Lensink, 2023. "Why agricultural insurance may slow down agricultural development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1197-1220, August.
    21. Rutsaert, Pieter & Donovan, Jason & Murphy, Mike & Hoffmann, Vivian, 2024. "Farmer decision making for hybrid maize seed purchases: Effects of brand loyalty, price discounts and product information," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.