IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ajagec/v106y2024i5p1571-1594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misattribution prevents learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica B. Hoel
  • Hope Michelson
  • Ben Norton
  • Victor Manyong

Abstract

In many markets, consumers believe things about products that are not true. We study how incorrect beliefs about product quality can persist even after a consumer has used a product many times. We explore the example of fertilizer in East Africa. Farmers believe much local fertilizer is counterfeit or adulterated; however, multiple studies have established that nearly all fertilizer in the area is good quality. We develop a learning model to explain how these incorrect beliefs persist. We show that when the distributions of outcomes using good and bad quality products overlap, agents can misattribute bad luck or bad management to bad quality. Our learning model and its simulations show that the presence of misattribution inhibits learning about quality and that goods like fertilizer with unobservable quality that are inputs into production processes characterized by stochasticity should be thought of as credence goods, not experience goods. Our results suggest that policy makers should pursue quality assurance programs for products that are vulnerable to misattribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica B. Hoel & Hope Michelson & Ben Norton & Victor Manyong, 2024. "Misattribution prevents learning," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(5), pages 1571-1594, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1571-1594
    DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajae.12466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1571-1594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8276 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.