Less-Favoured Areas: Looking Beyond Agriculture Towards Ecosystem Services
Many dryland regions are considered less favoured areas as they face a variety of either biophysical or socio-economic constraints to agricultural production and sustaining livelihoods. Growing population numbers, limited infrastructure and market access, land tenure problems as well as increasing degradation problems due to poor management of soils prone to erosion, steep slopes or low rainfall quantities are some of the limitations for agricultural production that have led in many areas to growing numbers of poor people. The paper describes a framework, using land and labour opportunity costs, for classifying dryland production systems and devising a set of development strategies based on initial resource use endowments and resulting land use. In this way policy options for dryland development are tied to the wider economic context within a country. Policy strategies for dryland areas are discussed which take the varying starting points for development into account. Options discussed include land management strategies where the provision of ecosystem services enhances agricultural productivity for areas with high opportunity costs of land. Under high labour, but low land opportunity costs conditions, land unproductive for agricultural production could have good potential for land uses that produce non-agricultural ecosystem services. Mapping out these varying land management strategies can thus help to tailor policy measures to specific dryland area conditions.
|Date of creation:||2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Agricultural Sector in Economic Development Service FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome Italy|
Phone: +39(6) 57051
Fax: +39 06 57055522
Web page: http://www.fao.org/es/esa/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Oscar J. Cacho & Graham R. Marshall & Mary Milne, 2003. "Smallholder Agroforestry Projects: Potential for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation," Working Papers 03-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
- Pagiola, Stefano & Arcenas, Agustin & Platais, Gunars, 2005. "Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 237-253, February.
- De Jong, Ben H. J. & Tipper, Richard & Montoya-Gomez, Guillermo, 2000. "An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 313-327, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fao:wpaper:0608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gustavo Anríquez)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.