IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/26006.html

Do Family Firm Sellers Consider Stewardship in M&A Decisions?

Author

Listed:
  • Yuichiro KUBO
  • Tomohito HONDA
  • Hirofumi UCHIDA

Abstract

This study examines whether, when acting as sellers in M&A transactions, privately held firms set sales conditions and make buyer selection decisions that reflect stewardship considerations. Using unique data on M&A involving privately held small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), our analysis reveals that many set sales conditions which reflect their preferences for stewardship-orientation. However, we do not find that family firms are more likely to do so, nor to select buyers with less informational asymmetry, than non-family firms. These findings indicate that in M&A transactions, privately held firms behave as suggested by stewardship theory, but there are no significant differences between family and non-family firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuichiro KUBO & Tomohito HONDA & Hirofumi UCHIDA, 2026. "Do Family Firm Sellers Consider Stewardship in M&A Decisions?," Discussion papers 26006, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/26e006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morela Hernandez, 2008. "Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 121-128, June.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    3. Jean‐Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & David G. Sirmon & Philippe Very, 2007. "The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 73-95, January.
    4. Pramodita Sharma & S. Manikutty, 2005. "Strategic Divestments in Family Firms: Role of Family Structure and Community Culture," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(3), pages 293-311, May.
    5. Jean-Luc Arrègle & Michael Hitt & David Sirmon & Philippe Véry, 2007. "The Development of Organizational Social Capital : Attributes of Family Firms," Post-Print hal-02312687, HAL.
    6. Ai, Chunrong & Norton, Edward C., 2003. "Interaction terms in logit and probit models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 123-129, July.
    7. David R. King & Olimpia Meglio & Luis Gomez‐Mejia & Florian Bauer & Alfredo De Massis, 2022. "Family Business Restructuring: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 197-235, January.
    8. Thomas M. Zellweger & Franz W. Kellermanns & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua, 2012. "Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 851-868, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Bertschi-Michel & Philipp Sieger & Thomas Wittig & Andreas Hack, 2023. "Sacrifice, Protect, and Hope for the Best: Family Ownership, Turnaround Moves, and Crisis Survival," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1132-1168, July.
    2. Martin Tao-Schuchardt & Frederik J. Riar & Nadine Kammerlander, 2023. "Family Firm Value in the Acquisition Context: A Signaling Theory Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1200-1232, July.
    3. Ahlers, Oliver & Hack, Andreas & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2014. "“Stepping into the buyers’ shoes”: Looking at the value of family firms through the eyes of private equity investors," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 384-396.
    4. Victoria Antin Yates & James M. Vardaman & James J. Chrisman, 2023. "Social network research in the family business literature: a review and integration," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1323-1345, April.
    5. Pieper, Torsten M., 2010. "Non solus: Toward a psychology of family business," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 26-39, March.
    6. Marta Widz & Nadine Kammerlander, 2023. "Entrepreneurial exit intentions in emerging economies: a neoinstitutional perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 615-638, February.
    7. Debellis, Francesco & Rondi, Emanuela & Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella & De Massis, Alfredo, 2021. "Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    8. Réal Labelle & Taïeb Hafsi & Claude Francoeur & Walid Ben Amar, 2018. "Family Firms’ Corporate Social Performance: A Calculated Quest for Socioemotional Wealth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 511-525, March.
    9. Paleit, Sören & Riar, Frederik J. & Hülsbeck, Marcel & Hack, Andreas, 2025. "Family firm perceptions and investment decisions: An experimental conjoint analysis of private equity investors," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    10. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein & Lasse B. Lien & Thomas Zellweger & Todd Zenger, 2021. "Ownership competence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 302-328, February.
    11. Johan Wiklund & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt & Miriam Bird, 2013. "Internal versus External Ownership Transition in Family Firms: An Embeddedness Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(6), pages 1319-1340, November.
    12. Suess, Julia, 2014. "Family governance – Literature review and the development of a conceptual model," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 138-155.
    13. Engel, Pascal J. & Hack, Andreas & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2015. "Setting the right mix—Analyzing outside directors’ pay mix in public family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 130-140.
    14. Bauweraerts, Jonathan & Sciascia, Salvatore & Naldi, Lucia & Mazzola, Pietro, 2019. "Family CEO and board service: Turning the tide for export scope in family SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    15. Michele Pinelli & Francesco Chirico & Alfredo De Massis & Alessandro Zattoni, 2024. "Acquisition Relatedness in Family Firms: Do the Environment and the Institutional Context Matter?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1562-1589, June.
    16. Nathan L. Hammond & Allison W. Pearson & Daniel T. Holt, 2016. "The Quagmire of Legacy in Family Firms: Definition and Implications of Family and Family Firm Legacy Orientations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(6), pages 1209-1231, November.
    17. Wright, Mike & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2011. "Family firms: A research agenda and publication guide," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 187-198.
    18. Georges Samara & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2018. "Independent directors and family firm performance: does one size fit all?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 149-172, March.
    19. Åberg, Carl & Haugland Sundkvist, Charlotte & Campopiano, Giovanna, 2025. "The humanistic state in family firms: Exploring the significance of socioemotional wealth and culture as drivers of stewardship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Alain Verbeke & Liena Kano, 2012. "The Transaction Cost Economics Theory of the Family Firm: Family–Based Human Asset Specificity and the Bifurcation Bias," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(6), pages 1183-1205, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:26006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.