IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esm/wpaper/esmt-18-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reverse privatization as a reaction to the competitive environment: Evidence from solid waste collection in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Juri Demuth

    (E.CA Economics)

  • Hans W. Friederiszick

    (ESMT European School of Management and Technology and E.CA Economics)

  • Steffen Reinhold

    (E.CA Economics)

Abstract

After earlier waves of privatization, local governments have increasingly taken back control of local service provisions in some sectors and countries and, instead, started providing those services themselves (reverse privatization). Using a unique panel data set on the mode of service provision for solid waste collection for German municipalities covering the years 2003, 2009, and 2015, we investigate motives for reverse privatization. Our results show that, in deciding whether to insource or not, municipalities react to the cost advantages of private suppliers as well as to the competitive environment, with more switching to insourcing in concentrated markets. Furthermore, we find local contagion effects, that is, insourcing is more likely if municipalities close by also provide services themselves, whether in horizontally or vertically-related markets. Implications for competition law enforcement are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Juri Demuth & Hans W. Friederiszick & Steffen Reinhold, 2018. "Reverse privatization as a reaction to the competitive environment: Evidence from solid waste collection in Germany," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-02, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
  • Handle: RePEc:esm:wpaper:esmt-18-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://static.esmt.org/publications/workingpapers/ESMT-18-02.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Germà Bel & Antonio Miralles, 2003. "Factors Influencing the Privatisation of Urban Solid Waste Collection in Spain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(7), pages 1323-1334, June.
    2. Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 1997. "Privatization in the United States," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(3), pages 447-471, Autumn.
    3. Antonio Miralles Asensio, 2009. "A duration model analysis of privatization of municipal water services," Revista de Economia Aplicada, Universidad de Zaragoza, Departamento de Estructura Economica y Economia Publica, vol. 17(2), pages 47-75, Autumn.
    4. Böckers, Veit & Hardorp, Lilian & Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich & Gösser, Niklas & Thorwarth, Susanne, 2016. "Wettbewerb in der Restmüllerfassung: Eine empirische Analyse der Anbieterstruktur," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 85, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    5. Astrid Cullmann & Maria Nieswand & Stefan Seifert & Caroline Stiel, 2016. "Trend zur (Re-)Kommunalisierung in der Energieversorgung: ein Mythos?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(20), pages 441-447.
    6. Bataille, Marc & Steinmetz, Alexander, 2014. "Kommunale Monopole in der Hausmüllentsorgung," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 63, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    7. Bardt, Hubertus & Fuest, Winfried & Lichtblau, Karl, 2010. "Kommunale Unternehmen auf Expansionskurs," IW-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, vol. 37(3), pages 57-69.
    8. Germà Bel & Xavier Fageda, 2009. "Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 105-119, April.
    9. Jonathan Levin & Steven Tadelis, 2010. "Contracting For Government Services: Theory And Evidence From U.S. Cities," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 507-541, September.
    10. Henry Ohlsson, 2003. "Ownership and Production Costs: Choosing between Public Production and Contracting-Out in the Case of Swedish Refuse Collection," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 24(4), pages 451-476, December.
    11. Germa Bel & Xavier Fageda, 2008. "Reforming the local public sector: economics and politics in privatization of water and solid waste," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 45-65.
    12. E. Dijkgraaf & R. Gradus, 2003. "Cost Savings of Contracting Out Refuse Collection," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 149-161, June.
    13. Oliver Hart & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1997. "The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 112(4), pages 1127-1161.
    14. repec:hrv:faseco:30727607 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Engartner, Tim, 2009. "Kehrt der Staat zurück? Rekommunalisierungen in den Aufgabenbereichen Entsorgung und Gebäudereinigung," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(4), pages 339-355.
    16. E. Dijkgraaf & R. H. J. M. Gradus & B. Melenberg, 2003. "Contracting out refuse collection," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 553-570, July.
    17. Bivand, Roger & Szymanski, Stefan, 2000. "Modelling the spatial impact of the introduction of Compulsory Competitive Tendering," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 203-219, March.
    18. repec:hrv:faseco:30727606 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Local privatization; state-owned enterprises; competition law enforcement; mergers; logit regression;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esm:wpaper:esmt-18-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ESMT Faculty Publications). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/emstbde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.