IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/26658.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

IoT 4 SDGs - What can the Digital Transformation and IoT achieve for Agenda 2030?

Author

Listed:
  • Renda, Andrea
  • Laurer, Moritz

Abstract

Digital technologies can drive growth, connect people and help us protect the environment. At the same time, they can lead to market concentration, fuel precarious working conditions and consume vast amounts of energy. The Internet of Things (IoT) is a perfect example of this tension, and embodies both the promise and the peril of digitalisation. Its emergence offers unique opportunities to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the European Green Deal, but policymakers need to be aware of the need for tailored policies and investments, if they want to maximise the benefits of the IoT revolution while mitigating the risks. This report illustrates the key features and evolutions of the IoT, and provides an overview of how the IoT is mostly used today in sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, energy and smart cities. We conclude that the IoT can massively contribute to several SDGs, especially through its capacity to increase efficiency and save costs. As the IoT is still a relatively young and complex technology, its use is mostly driven by wealthy cities and businesses. Its potential for more vulnerable populations in the global south and the environment remains underdeveloped. This points to an important dilemma for the IoT today from a sustainability perspective: while the main driver for IoT adoption is cost reduction and increased efficiency, sustainability goals such as poverty reduction and environmental protection often remain a secondary thought in its development. The role of public policy and investment will be essential to ensure that IoT solutions contribute to other SDGs in the near future and we outline different approaches for measuring this contribution. This report discusses in particular the policy measures that could be adopted in the European Union to boost the potential of the IoT for sustainability, in light of the European Green Deal and the upcoming 2021-2027 financial framework. This report was created in cooperation with Hitachi, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Renda, Andrea & Laurer, Moritz, 2020. "IoT 4 SDGs - What can the Digital Transformation and IoT achieve for Agenda 2030?," CEPS Papers 26658, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:26658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IoT4SDG-report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, 2014. "Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended Consequences," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2-3), pages 118-131, July.
    2. Justin Sandefur & Amanda Glassman, 2015. "The Political Economy of Bad Data: Evidence from African Survey and Administrative Statistics," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 116-132, February.
    3. Joseph Sarkis & Qingyun Zhu, 2018. "Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 743-759, January.
    4. Wang, Yichuan & Kung, LeeAnn & Byrd, Terry Anthony, 2018. "Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 3-13.
    5. Eugénie Joltreau & Katrin Sommerfeld, 2019. "Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 453-471, April.
    6. Reka, S. Sofana & Dragicevic, Tomislav, 2018. "Future effectual role of energy delivery: A comprehensive review of Internet of Things and smart grid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 90-108.
    7. Leceta, Jos� Manuel & Renda, Andrea & K�nn�l�, Totti & Simonelli, Felice, 2017. "Unleashing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Europe: People, Places and Policies," CEPS Papers 12268, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    8. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    2. Jules Gazeaud & Victor Stephane, 2023. "Productive Workfare? Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 265-290, January.
    3. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Miraç Fatih İLGÜN, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and Transformation in Public Finance: An Assessment by Government Expenditures," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(44).
    5. Quemin, Simon & Trotignon, Raphaël, 2021. "Emissions trading with rolling horizons," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Nguyen Dang Tuan, Minh & Nguyen Thanh, Nhan & Le Tuan, Loc, 2019. "Applying a mindfulness-based reliability strategy to the Internet of Things in healthcare – A business model in the Vietnamese market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 54-68.
    7. Tomasz Dudek & Tygran Dzhuguryan & Bogusz Wiśnicki & Kamil Pędziwiatr, 2022. "Smart Sustainable Production and Distribution Network Model for City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Clusters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Wadim Strielkowski & Dalia Streimikiene & Alena Fomina & Elena Semenova, 2019. "Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Andrea Katona & Zoltán Birkner & Erzsébet Péter, 2023. "Examining Digital Transformation Trends in Austrian and Hungarian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Yu, Wantao & Zhao, Gen & Liu, Qi & Song, Yongtao, 2021. "Role of big data analytics capability in developing integrated hospital supply chains and operational flexibility: An organizational information processing theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Jiang, Syuan-Yi, 2022. "Transition and innovation ecosystem – investigating technologies, focal actors, and institution in eHealth innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6d7es28iae9pjoil7092hs41h3 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Brewis, Claire & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen, 2023. "Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Dang, Hai-Anh & Carletto, Calogero, 2022. "Recall Bias Revisited: Measure Farm Labor Using Mixed-Mode Surveys and Multiple Imputation," IZA Discussion Papers 14997, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    17. Reynolds, Travis W. & Anderson, C. Leigh & Slakie, Elysia & Gugerty, Mary Kay, 2015. "How Common Crop Yield Measures Misrepresent Productivity among Smallholder Farmers," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212485, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Lin, Weiming & Chen, Jianling & Zheng, Yi & Dai, Yongwu, 2019. "Effects of the EU Emission Trading Scheme on the international competitiveness of pulp-and-paper industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    19. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    20. Guanghua Chi & Han Fang & Sourav Chatterjee & Joshua E. Blumenstock, 2022. "Microestimates of wealth for all low- and middle-income countries," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(3), pages 2113658119-, January.
    21. Huang, Yumeng & Dai, Xingyu & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2021. "A hybrid model for carbon price forecastingusing GARCH and long short-term memory network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:26658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.