IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anf/wpaper/50.html

Better methods of running subsidy programs: Evidence from the Karnataka schemes of 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Kulkarni

    (xKDR Forum)

  • Ajay Shah

    (xKDR Forum)

  • Susan Thomas

    (xKDR Forum)

Abstract

Governments in developing countries spend heavily on subsidies, yet much of the money never reaches households: the macro-micro gap. We measure this gap in Karnataka, India, across a natural experiment. Karnataka has been delivering conditional Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT) for about a decade now. In July 2023 the state introduced new "guarantee schemes", and directed much of its DBT allocation to a near-unconditional scheme. Because administrative records are endogenous to the state that produces them, we measure household receipts independently, from the CMIE Consumer Pyramids Household Survey. We compare robust population estimates from this survey against the state's reported expenditure on DBTs in both periods. The gap averaged about 78% over the seven pre-2023 years and fell to about 17% after the shift. The paper contributes independently measured evidence on subsidy delivery in India and a replicable method for auditing welfare programs in the presence of longitudinal data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Kulkarni & Ajay Shah & Susan Thomas, 2026. "Better methods of running subsidy programs: Evidence from the Karnataka schemes of 2023," Working Papers 50, xKDR.
  • Handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.xkdr.org/papers/2026Kulkarnietal_SubsidiesMacroMicroGap.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ami Dagli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://papers.xkdr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.