IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3491-d172797.html

The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Judit Nagy

    (Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Corvinus Business School, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Judit Oláh

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Edina Erdei

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Domicián Máté

    (Institute of Accounting and Finance, Controlling Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • József Popp

    (Institute of Sectoral Economics and Methodology, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

In the era of industrial digitalization, companies are increasingly investing in tools and solutions that allow their processes, machines, employees, and even the products themselves, to be integrated into a single integrated network for data collection, data analysis, the evaluation of company development, and performance improvement. To study the impact of Industry 4.0 on the company we used Porter’s (1985) value chain model, which is particularly useful when paying particular attention to corporate areas which have a primary role in customer value creation. Since the primary impact of Industry 4.0 is perceived in value-creating processes, and has so far had the greatest transformative effect in this area, the model can be considered to be appropriate. The objective of our research is to discover how companies operating in Hungary interpret the phenomenon of Industry 4.0, what Internet of Things (IoT) tools they use to support their processes, and what critical issues they face during adaptation. We applied a dual methodology in our investigation: We sent an online questionnaire to manufacturing and logistical service companies to investigate the IoT tools they use, and the problems they face, and received 43 answers we could evaluate. We also conducted four expert interviews with manufacturing firms to get deeper insights into the application, critical issues and development phases of IoT tools. During our research, we found that the spread of real-time data across companies—given the availability of appropriate analytical tools and methods—can have a significant impact on the entire company. In the case of CPS (Cyber Physical System), CPPS and Big Data Technologies, companies using them have been evaluated as having a higher level of logistic service, more efficient processes with their partners, improved cooperation between certain logistic functions, and higher market and financial performance and competitiveness. Applying more efficient production processes, and achieving better productivity and economies of scale, might also result in increased economic sustainability. Furthermore, we have found that companies have started on the path to digital evolution, and investments of this type have already begun.

Suggested Citation

  • Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3491-:d:172797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Gang & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 98-110.
    2. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    3. Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q. & Lan, Shulin & Dai, Q.Y. & Chen, Xu & Zhang, T., 2015. "A big data approach for logistics trajectory discovery from RFID-enabled production data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 260-272.
    4. Jana Kliestikova & Maria Misankova & Tomas Kliestik, 2017. "Bankruptcy In Slovakia: International Comparison Of The Creditor´S Position," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 8(2), pages 221-237, June.
    5. Razvan Bologa & Ana-Ramona Lupu & Catalin Boja & Tiberiu Marian Georgescu, 2017. "Sustaining Employability: A Process for Introducing Cloud Computing, Big Data, Social Networks, Mobile Programming and Cybersecurity into Academic Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Julian Marius Müller & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2018. "What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Burmeister, & Lüttgens, & Piller,, 2016. "Business Model Innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the "Industrial Internet" Mandates a New Perspective on Innovation," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(2), pages 124-152.
    8. Christian Arnold & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "How The Industrial Internet Of Things Changes Business Models In Different Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Kuan Chung Lin & Joseph Z. Shyu & Kun Ding, 2017. "A Cross-Strait Comparison of Innovation Policy under Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Development Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Barbara Aquilani & Cecilia Silvestri & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2016. "Sustainability, TQM and Value Co-Creation Processes: The Role of Critical Success Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Jan F. Tesch & Anne-Sophie Brillinger & Dominik Bilgeri, 2017. "Internet Of Things Business Model Innovation And The Stage-Gate Process: An Exploratory Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Gyorgy Kovacs & Sebastian Kot, 2016. "New Logistics And Production Trends As The Effect Of Global Economy Changes," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(2), pages 115-126, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Marius Müller & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2018. "What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Mariani, Marcello & Borghi, Matteo, 2019. "Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    5. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Cecilia & Aquilani, Barbara & Silvestri, Luca, 2022. "Is this a new story of the ‘Two Giants’? A systematic literature review of the relationship between industry 4.0, sustainability and its pillars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Yun Liu & Zhe Yan & Yijie Cheng & Xuanting Ye, 2018. "Exploring the Technological Collaboration Characteristics of the Global Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Atik Kulakli & Cenk Lacin Arikan, 2023. "Research Trends of the Internet of Things in Relation to Business Model Innovation: Results from Co-Word and Content Analyses," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Roßmann, Bernhard & Canzaniello, Angelo & von der Gracht, Heiko & Hartmann, Evi, 2018. "The future and social impact of Big Data Analytics in Supply Chain Management: Results from a Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 135-149.
    11. Hamed Jahani & Richa Jain & Dmitry Ivanov, 2026. "Data science and big data analytics: a systematic review of methodologies used in the supply chain and logistics research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(2), pages 1297-1354, April.
    12. Wang, Hui & Gong, Qiguo & Wang, Shouyang, 2017. "Information processing structures and decision making delays in MRP and JIT," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 41-49.
    13. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.
    14. Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Tortorella, Guilherme, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. repec:rbs:ijbess:v:7:y:2025:i:5:p:91-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. José Salvador da Motta Reis & Maximilian Espuny & Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Nilo Antonio de Souza Sampaio & Raine Isaksson & Fernando Celso de Campos & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Striding towards Sustainability: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, May.
    17. Iva Vuksanović Herceg & Vukašin Kuč & Veljko M. Mijušković & Tomislav Herceg, 2020. "Challenges and Driving Forces for Industry 4.0 Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Dong-Hui Jin & Hyun-Jung Kim, 2018. "Integrated Understanding of Big Data, Big Data Analysis, and Business Intelligence: A Case Study of Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Anna Adamik & Dorota Sikora-Fernandez, 2021. "Smart Organizations as a Source of Competitiveness and Sustainable Development in the Age of Industry 4.0: Integration of Micro and Macro Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Xu, Jinou & Pero, Margherita & Fabbri, Margherita, 2023. "Unfolding the link between big data analytics and supply chain planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    21. Julian Marius Müller, 2019. "Antecedents to Digital Platform Usage in Industry 4.0 by Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3491-:d:172797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.