IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002672/4452.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling sectorally differentiated water prices and policies: an application to the Israeli water economy

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Luckmann
  • Khalid Siddig
  • Harald Grethe

Abstract

At the moment Israel is facing the worst water supply crisis since the beginning of record keeping more than 80 years ago. The Israeli National Water Authority (NWA) declared recently that drought conditions are continuing for eight consecutive years now (Jerusalem Post, 2012). This, together with an increasing demand for potable water due to economic growth and immigration has led to a situation of overexploitation of the renewable water resources within the country. Already by 2010 the cumulative deficit amounted to about 1.5 - 2 million m³, which is close to Israel’s annual total water consumption (NIC, 2010). Also the quality of potable water resources is deteriorating. With groundwater tables falling due to over-extraction, especially the coastal aquifer is prone to seawater intrusion resulting in an increasing salinity level of potable water (Zaide, 2009). In response to this crisis, the development of alternative water sources including desalination of seawater and wastewater recycling as well as usage of brackish groundwater for irrigation purposes was fostered (Zaide, 2009). In addition, the NWA was established in 2007 to centrally govern water resources within Israel and the existing complex water pricing regime, with prices being differentiated according to user-group (municipal including households and services, industrial and agricultural) as well as between different water qualities (saline, reclaimed, fresh). This pricing scheme particularly favors the agricultural sector which is charged relatively low water prices, whereas the price charged from municipal users covers the costs of supply. On the other hand, the main supplier of water in Israel (67% of total water supply) is a state owned company which receives financial support from the government in order to reduce water-provision costs (Zhou, 2006). To increase efficiency in the Israeli water economy, a report by the National Investigation Committee on the subject of the management of the water economy in Israel (NIC) published in 2010 suggested several principals for the management of national water resources. Among these are that water needs to be regarded as a raw resource and its extraction needs to be limited to an amount below the average annual recharge. To achieve this, a water pricing scheme reflecting total water supply costs, including extraction, transportation and also environmental costs was recommended. In addition, a block rate pricing scheme with increasing prices for higher consumption levels was suggested to ensure affordable for basic consumption (NIC, 2010). This study takes up the proposal by the NIC and applies a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, in which the water sector is explicitly modeled. With this approach, an efficient pricing scheme regarding the different water qualities and users within the Israeli economy is simulated. We employ a single country CGE-model to reflect the relations between the Israeli water sector and the rest of the economy. The model is based on the standard STAGE model (McDonald, 2009) and is adjusted to fit an Israeli SAM, which depicts the Israeli economy in the year 2004 and includes data on 45 commodities and activities, 38 factor accounts, 10 household types and 18 tax categories. The water sector is explicitly modelled to include the freshwater resource as a factor of production and three different water commodities (potable water, recycled wastewater and brackish water) which are produced by three activities with different cost structures. All three activities employ fixed proportions of capital, labour and intermediaries. The three water commodities are included as intermediate inputs in the production functions of the other sectors or are consumed as final products by households. Furthermore, as the SAM only provides value data, satellite accounts for water quantities consumed by different user groups based on data provided by the Israeli Central Statistical Office are included (CBS, 2009). To be able to model water prices endogenously, new variables for the prices of the different water commodities are introduced. We introduce quotas to reflect the block rate pricing scheme and the subsidized prices for basic domestic consumption as well as the agricultural and industrial sectors. The reference scenario, depicting the applied water prices in 2004 is compared to a simulation in which quotas for subsidized water prices are reduced. In a second scenario additionally the above quota water price is lifted to the cost of desalination, representing the marginal price for water in Israel (Zhou, 2006). An increase in the price of potable water is expected to have a negative effect on the economy as a whole, especially the agricultural sector is expected to be hit hardest as it is the biggest potable water consumer in Israel and enjoys the most favorable prices in the reference scenario. However, within the agricultural sector the shock can partially be mitigated by an increased usage of marginal water (reclaimed wastewater and brackish water) which can be supplied at a lower price, but cannot be used in all agricultural sectors for hygienic reasons and due to low salinity tolerance of many crops. Industrial and municipal users are expected to be affected to a lower extend, as the share of water in the cost structure of most industrial and service sectors as well as in household consumption is rather small. However, due to the block rate pricing scheme rich households are expected to be stronger affected than poor households, as rich households tend to consume more water above the basic consumption quota and therefore on average face higher prices. References CBS (2009): Statistical Abstract of Israel 2008, No. 59. The Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Jerusalem, Israel. Jerusalem Post (2012): Water Authority: Israel in 8th straight drought year. The Jerusalem Post. 01.02.2012. Available at: http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=251892&R= R101. Accessed: 01.12.2012 McDonald, S. (2009): STAGE Version 1: July 2007. Course documentation. NIC (2010): Committee’s Report Abstract. National Investigation Committee on the subject of the management of the water economy in Israel. Haifa, Israel. Zaide, M. (2009): Drought and Arid Land Water Management. United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD)-16/17 National Report Israel. Zhou, G. (2006): Water Resources Management in an Arid Environment - The Case of Israel. Background Paper No. 3. The World Bank, Environment and Social Development Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, Washington D.C.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Luckmann & Khalid Siddig & Harald Grethe, 2012. "Modeling sectorally differentiated water prices and policies: an application to the Israeli water economy," EcoMod2012 4452, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Jonas%20Luckmann%20EcoMod%202012%20%20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dolores Tirado & Carlos M. Gómez & Javier Lozano, 2006. "Efficiency improvements and water policy in the balearic islands: a general equilibrium approach," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 30(3), pages 441-463, September.
    2. Amir, I. & Fisher, F. M., 2000. "Response of near-optimal agricultural production to water policies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 115-130, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luckmann, J. & Siddig, K. & Flaig, D. & Grethe, H., 2013. "A general equilibrium approach to model water scarcity in Israel," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    2. Luckmann, Jonas & Siddig, Khalid H.A. & Flaig, Dorothee & Grethe, Harald, 2012. "Mitigating Water Scarcity In Israel – A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 133942, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. van Nieuwkoop, Renger, 2011. "Fit2GTAP: Replacing country data in the GTAP data base," Conference papers 332142, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Dinar, Ariel, 2012. "Economy-wide implications of direct and indirect policy interventions in the water sector: lessons from recent work and future research needs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6068, The World Bank.
    5. Rashid Hassan & James Thurlow, 2011. "Macro–micro feedback links of water management in South Africa: CGE analyses of selected policy regimes," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(2), pages 235-247, March.
    6. Pérez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio & Gómez Gómez, Carlos Mario & Del Villar García, Alberto, 2011. "El riesgo de disponibilidad de agua en la agricultura: una aplicación a las cuencas del Guadalquivir y del Segura/Water Availability Risk in Agriculture: An Application to Guadalquivir and Segura Rive," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 333-358, Abril.
    7. Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2015. "When Water Saving Limits Recycling: Modeling Economy-wide Linkages of Wastewater Use," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212161, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2015. "When Water Saving Limits Recycling: Modeling Cascading Water Use in a Computable General Equilibrium Framework," Conference papers 332622, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Yiyu Feng & Ming Chang & Erga Luo & Jing Liu, 2023. "Has Property Rights Reform of China’s Farmland Water Facilities Improved Farmers’ Irrigation Efficiency?—Evidence from a Typical Reform Pilot in China’s Yunnan Province," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Carlos Dionisio Pérez Blanco & Carlos Mario Gómez Gómez, 2014. "An Integrated Risk Assessment Model for the Implementation of Drought Insurance Markets in Spain," Working Papers 2014.62, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Cakmak, Erol H. & Dudu, Hasan & Saracoglu, Sirin & Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry & Tsur, Yacov, 2008. "Macro-Micro Feedback Links Of Irrigation Water Management In Turkey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4781, The World Bank.
    12. Perez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio & Gomez Gomez, Carlos Mario, 2012. "Development of private insurance schemes as a means to reduce water overexploitation during drought events. A case study in Campo de Cartagena (Segura River Basin, Spain)," 123rd Seminar, February 23-24, 2012, Dublin, Ireland 122453, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Pérez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio & Gómez Gómez, Carlos Mario & Garrido Yserte, Rubén, 2010. "Cambio estructural regional y agua: Escasez, dependencia e impactos sobre el tejido económico. El caso de Andalucía/Structural Change and Water: Scarcity, Dependence and Impacts on the Economy. The Ca," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 28, pages 423-446, Agosto.
    14. Adam Loch & David Adamson, 2015. "Drought and the rebound effect: a Murray–Darling Basin example," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1429-1449, December.
    15. Gomez, Carlos Mario & Gutierrez, Carlos, 2011. "Enhancing Irrigation Efficiency but Increasing Water Use: The Jevons' Paradox," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114622, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Gomez Gomez, Carlos Mario & Perez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio, 2013. "Myths and Maths of Water Efficiency: An Analytical Framework to Assess the Real Outcome of Water Saving Technologies in Irrigation," 87th Annual Conference, April 8-10, 2013, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 158690, Agricultural Economics Society.
    17. Salman, Amer Zahi & Al-Karablieh, Emad, 2004. "Measuring the willingness of farmers to pay for groundwater in the highland areas of Jordan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 61-76, July.
    18. Luckmann, Jonas & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott & Orlov, Anton & Siddig, Khalid, 2013. "A general equilibrium approach to modelling multiple types and uses of water," Conference papers 332401, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Wei Qu & Jing Yan & Yanmei Tan & Qin Tu, 2021. "Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Cognition on the Function of Agricultural Water Price—Taking Hexi Corridor as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Luckmann, Jonas & Ihle, Rico & Kleinwechter, Ulrich & Grethe, Harald, 2015. "The Effects of Vietnamese Export Policies on the World Market Integration of Domestic Rice Markets," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212159, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.